Goal-Directed Guidance of Attention: Evidence from Conjunctive Visual Search

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 948-961

  Bacon, William F ^a   Egeth, Howard E ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; REACTION TIME; TOOTH OCCLUSION; VISION;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VERTICAL DIMENSION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031202320     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.948     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bacon, W. F., & Egeth. H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
2. Bergen, J. R., & Julesz, B. (1983). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination. Nature, 303, 696-698.
3. Bravo, M. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465-472.
4. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
5. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
6. Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1992). Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 113-138.
7. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
8. Egeth, H., & Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 551-560.
9. Egeth, H. E., Atkinson, J., Gilmore, G., & Marcus, N. (1973). Factors affecting processing mode in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 394-402.
10. Egeth, H. E., Jonides, J., & Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 674-698.
11. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively-defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32-39.
12. Epstein, W., & Rock, I. (1960). Perceptual set as an artifact of recency. Journal of American Psychology, 73, 214-228.
13. Farmer, E. W., & Taylor, R. M. (1980). Visual search through color displays: Effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 267-272.
14. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
15. Francolini, C. M., & Egeth, H. E. (1980). On the nonautomaticity of "automatic" activation: Evidence of selective seeing. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 331-342.
16. Humphreys, G. W. (1981). Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 291-302.
17. Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., & Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1053-1069.
18. Kingstone, A., & Klein, R. (1991). Combining shape and position expectancies: Hierarchical processing and selective inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 512-519.
19. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
20. Lambert, A. J., & Corban, R. (1992). Spatial attention and expectancy for colour, category and location: Further evidence against the spotlight model. Acta Psychologica, 81, 39-51.
21. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of popout: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
22. McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 339, 154-155.
23. Neisser, U. (1963). Decision time without reaction time: Experiments in visual scanning. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 376-385.
24. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25. Pashler, H. (1987). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 191-201.
26. Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 307-318.
27. Poisson, M. E., & Wilkinson, F. (1992). Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search. Perception, 21, 21-38.
28. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1984). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation. Perception, 13, 619-628.
29. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985, June 7). "Where" and "what" in vision. Science, 228, 1217-1219.
30. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
31. Theeuwes, J. (1993). Visual selective attention: A theoretical analysis. Acta Psychologica, 83, 93-154.
32. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799-806.
33. Townsend, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 161-163.
34. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like tweedledum and tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
35. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
36. Treisman, A., & Sato, A. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
37. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
38. Treisman, A.M., Sykes, M., & Gelade, G. (1977). Selective attention and stimulus integration. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 333-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1988). Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 15-21.
40. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
41. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
42. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.
43. Zohary, E., & Hochstein, S. (1989). How serial is serial processing in vision? Perception, 18, 191-200.