Fast Color Grouping and Slow Color Inhibition: Evidence for Distinct Temporal Windows for Separate Processes in Preview Search

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 503-517

  Braithwaite, Jason J ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a   Hulleman, Johan ^a   Watson, Derrick G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

attentional guidance; color grouping; inhibition; time effects; visual selective attention

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34547421203     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.503     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agter F., and Donk M. Prioritized selection in visual search through onset capture and color inhibition: Evidence from a probe-dot detection task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 722-730
2. Bacon W.F., and Egeth H.E. Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 948-961
3. Belopolsky A.V., Peterson M.S., and Kramer A.F. Visual search in temporally segregated displays: Converging operations in the study of the preview benefit. Cognitive Brain Research 24 (2005) 453-466
4. Braithwaite J.J., Hulleman J., Watson D.G., and Humphreys G.W. Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search. Perception & Psychophysics 68 (2006) 290-300
5. Braithwaite J.J., and Humphreys G.W. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 213-237
6. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., and Hodsoll J. Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carry-over effects in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 758-778
7. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., and Hodsoll J. Effects of colour on preview search: Anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour. Spatial Vision 17 (2004) 389-425
8. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., and Hulleman J. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search. Perception & Psychophysics 67 (2005) 81-101
9. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., Watson D.G., and Hulleman J. Revisiting preview search benefits at isoluminance: New onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage. Perception & Psychophysics 67 (2005) 1214-1228
10. Donk M., and Theeuwes J. Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics 93 (2001) 891-900
11. Donk M., and Theeuwes J. Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 1231-1242
12. Donk M., and Verburg R.C. Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (2004) 282-288
13. Duncan J., and Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96 (1989) 433-458
14. Duncan J., and Humphreys G.W. Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 578-588
15. Egeth H.E., Virzi R.A., and Garbart H. Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 (1984) 32-39
16. Humphreys G.W., Jung-Stalmann B., and Olivers C.N.L. An analysis of the time course of visual marking using a probe-dot procedure. Perception & Psychophysics 66 (2004) 713-730
17. Humphreys G.W., Olivers C.N.L., and Yoon E.Y. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: Neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006) 110-120
18. Humphreys G.W., Watson D.G., and Jolicoeur P. Fractionating visual marking: Dual-task decomposition of the marking state by timing and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 640-660
19. Jiang Y., Marks L.E., and Chun M.M. Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 717-730
20. Kaptein N.A., Theeuwes J., and van der Heijiden A.H.C. Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 1053-1069
21. Moore C.M., and Egeth H. How does feature-based attention affect visual processing?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1296-1310
22. Olivers C.N.L., and Humphreys G.W. When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 22-42
23. Olivers C.N.L., and Humphreys G.W. Visual marking and singleton capture: Fractionating the unitary nature of visual selection. Cognitive Psychology 47 (2003) 1-42
24. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W., and Braithwaite J.J. The preview search task: Evidence for visual marking. Visual Cognition 14 (2006) 716-735
25. Olivers, C. N. L., Humphreys, G. W., & Braithwaite, J. J. (in press). Feature-based inhibitory carry-over effects from old to new. Visual Cognition
26. Olivers C.N.L., Watson D.G., and Humphreys G.W. Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A (1999) 679-715
27. Peterson M.S., Belopolsky A.V., and Kramer A.F. Contingent visual marking by transients. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 695-710
28. Poisson M.E., and Wilkinson F. Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual search. Perception 21 (1992) 21-38
29. Theeuwes J., Kramer A.F., and Atchley P. Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5 (1998) 130-134
30. Treisman A. Feature binding, attention and object perception. In: Humphreys G.W., Duncan J., and Treisman A. (Eds). Attention space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (1999), Oxford University Press, New York 91-112
31. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
32. Treisman A., and Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95 (1998) 15-48
33. Treisman A., and Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 459-478
34. Watson D.G., and Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 90-122
35. Watson D.G., and Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 471-481
36. Watson D.G., and Humphreys G.W. Visual marking and visual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 379-395
37. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W., and Olivers C.N.L. Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 180-186
38. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 (1994) 202-238
39. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. In: Pashler H. (Ed). Attention (1998), University College London Press, London 13-73
40. Yantis S. Attentional capture in vision. In: Kramer A.F., Coles M.G.H., and Logan G.D. (Eds). Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (1996), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 45-77
41. Yantis S. Objects, attention and perceptual experience. In: Wright R.D. (Ed). Visual attention (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
42. Yantis S., and Jones E. Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags. Perception & Psychophysics 50 (1991) 166-178