Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with and without bevel: 6-month follow-up

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 1-8

  Coelho de Souza, Fabio Herrmann ^a   Klein Júnior, Celso Afonso ^b   Camargo, Junara Cristina ^c   Beskow, Tiago ^c   Balestrin, Matheus Dalmolin ^c   Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE LUTERANA DO BRASIL   (Brazil)

^c Federal University of Pelotas ^*

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bevel; Clinical trial; Composite resins; Posterior teeth

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK P60 COMPOSITE RESIN; RESIN; SINGLE BOND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ADULT; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; CURING LIGHTS, DENTAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MOLAR; RECURRENCE; RUBBER DAMS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954745390     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-11-2-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22(2):143-51.
2. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001; 3(1):45-64.
3. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(5):481-508.
4. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84(2):118-32.
5. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996; 21(1):17-24.
6. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper dent. 2003; 28(3):215-35.
7. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S. Shear bond strength, microleakage and gap formation with fourth generation dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1994; 7(6):312-4.
8. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Kuijs R, Burgerdijk RC. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80(3):274-9.
9. Schmidlin PR, Wolleb K, Imfeld T, Gygax M, Lussi A. Influence of beveling and ultrasound application on marginal adaptation of box-only Class II (slot) resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(3):291-7.
10. Coelho-de-Souza FH, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(1):37-43.
11. Sharpe AN. Influence of the crystal orientation in human enamel on its reactivity to acid as shown by high resolution microradiography. Arch Oral Biol. 1967; 12(5):583-92.
12. Coelho-de-Souza FH, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Influence of restorative technique, beveling, and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10(2):113-7.
13. Sturdevant JR, Lundeen TF, Sluder TB Jr., Leinfelder KF. Three-year study of two lightcured posterior composite resins. Dent Mater. 1986; 2(6):263-8.
14. Leirskar J, Henaug T, Thoreson NR, Nordbø H, von der Fehr FR. Clinical performance of indirect composite resin inlays/onlays in a dental school: observations up to 34 months. Acta Odontol Scand. 1999; 57(4):216-20.
15. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent. 2000; 28(6):375-82.
16. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/ onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000; 28(5):299-306.
17. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7(2):63-70.
18. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7(2):71-9.
19. de Moura FR, Piva E, Lund RG, Palha B, Demarco FF. One-year clinical evaluation of two polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in posterior permanent teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2004; 6(2):157-62.
20. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Brackett MG, Callan RS, Blalock JS. Effect of restoration size on the clinical performance of posterior "packable" resin composites over 18 months. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(3):212-6.
21. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98-FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9 Suppl 1:121-47.
22. Hoelscher DC, Gregory WA, Linger JB, Pink FE. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2000; 13(4):171-5.
23. Peixoto RT, Poletto LT, Lanza MD, Buono VT. The influence of occlusal finish line configuration on microleakage of indirect composite inlays. J Adhes Dent. 2002; 4(2):145-50.
24. Swanson TK, Feigal RJ, Tantbirojn D, Hodges JS. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2008; 30(2):134-40.