Vickrey vs. eBay: Why second-price sealed-bid auctions lead to more realistic price-demand functions

International Journal of Electronic Commerce

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 7-38

  Barrot, Christian ^a   Albers, Sönke ^b   Skiera, Bernd ^c   Schäfers, Björn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^c GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Market research; on line auctions; pricing; Vickrey auctions; willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954550742     PISSN: 10864415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415140401     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alberini, A.; Kanninen, B.; and Carson, R.T. Modelling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data. Land Economics, 73 (August 1997), 309-324.
2. Ausubel, L.M., and Milgrom, P. The lovely but lonely Vickrey auction. In P. Cramton, R. Steinberg, and Y. Shoham (eds.), Combinatorial Auctions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006, pp. 17-40.
3. Ba, S., and Pavlou, P.A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26, 3 (2002), 243-268.
4. Bapna, R.; Goes, P.; and Gupta, A. Analysis and design of business-to- consumer online auctions. Management Science, 49 (January 2003), 85-101.
5. Bapna, R.; Jank, W.; and Shmueli, G. Consumer surplus in online auctions. Information Systems Research, 19, 4 (2008), 400-416.
6. Bapna, R.; Chang, S.A.; Goes, P.; and Gupta, A. Overlapping online auctions: Empirical characterization of bidder strategies and auction prices. MIS Quarterly, 33, 4 (2009), 763-783.
7. Becker, G.M.; DeGroot, M.H.; and Marschak, J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9 (July 1964), 226-232.
8. Bijmolt, T.H.A.; Van Heerde, H.J.; and Pieters, R.G.M. New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (May 2005), 141-156.
9. Borle, S.; Boatwright, P.; and Kadane, J.B. The timing of bid placement and extent of multiple bidding: An empirical investigation using eBay online auctions. Statistical Science, 21, 2 (2006), 194-205.
10. Camerer, C.F. Three cheers-psychological, theoretical, empirical-for loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 2 (2005), 129-133.
11. Cameron, T.A., and James, M.D. Efficient estimation methods for "closed-ended" contingent valuation surveys. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69 (May 1987), 269-276.
12. Chan, T.Y.; Kadiyali, V.; and Park, Y.-H. Willingness to pay and competition in online auctions. Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (May 2007), 324-333.
13. Cheema, A.; Leszczyc, P.T.L.P.; Bagchi, R.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Cox, J.C.; Dholakia, U.M.; Greenleaf, E.A.; Pazgal, A.; Rothkopf, M.H.; Shen, M.; Sunder, S.; and Zeithammer, R. Economics, psychology, and social dynamics of consumer bidding in auctions. Marketing Letters, 16, 3 (2005), 401-413.
14. Dholakia, U.M.; Basuroy, S; and Soltysinski, K. Auction or agent (or both)? A study of moderators of the herding bias in digital auctions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 2 (2002), 115-130.
15. Ding, M. A truth telling mechanism for conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (May 2007), 214-223.
16. Ding, M.; Grewal, R.; and Liechty, J. Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (February 2005), 67-82.
17. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
18. Geng, X.; Stinchcombe, M.B.; and Whinston, A.B. Radically new product introduction using on-line auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, 3 (spring 2001), 169-189.
19. Gijsbrechts, E. Prices and pricing research in consumer marketing: Some recent developments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 2 (1993), 115-151.
20. Glass, G.V., and Stanley, J.C. Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1970.
21. Gregg, D.G., and Scott, J.E. The role of reputation systems in reducing on-line auction fraud. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10, 3 (spring 2006), 95-120.
22. Gregg, D.G., and Walczak, S. Dressing your online auction business for success: An experiment comparing two eBay businesses. MIS Quarterly, 32, 3 (2008), 653-670.
23. Hanssens, D.M.; Parsons, L.J.; and Schultz, R.L. Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2001.
24. Haruvy, E.; Popkowski Leszczyc, P.; Carare, O.; Cox, J.; Greenleaf, E.; Jank, W.; Jap, S.; Park, Y.-H.; and Rothkopf, M. Competition between auctions. Marketing Letters, 19, 3 (2008), 431-448.
25. Hidvegi, Z.; Wang, W.; and Whinston, A.B. Binary Vickrey auction-A robust and efficient multi-unit sealed-bid online auction protocol against buyer multi-identity bidding. Decision Support Systems, Emerging Issues in Collaborative Commerce, 43, 2 (2007), 301-312.
26. Hoffman, E.; Menkhaus, D.J.; Chakravarti, D.; Field, R.A.; and Whipple, G.D. Using laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research: A case study of new packaging for fresh beef. Marketing Science, 12 (summer 1993), 318-338.
27. Hu, X.; Lin, Z.; Whinston, A.B.; and Zhang, H. Hope or hype: On the viability of escrow services as trusted third parties in online auction environments. Information Systems Research, 15, 3 (2004), 236-249.
28. ICC/ESOMAR. ICC/ESOMAR International Code of Marketing and Social Research Practice. Amsterdam, 2005.
29. Jank, W., and Shmueli, G. Studying heterogeneity of price evolution in eBay auctions via functional clustering. In G. Adomavicius and A. Gupta (eds.), Business Computing. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 2009, pp. 237-262.
30. Kaas, K.P., and Ruprecht, H. Are the Vickrey auction and the BDM- mechanism really incentive compatible? Schmalenbach Business Review, 58 (January 2006), 37-55.
31. Kagel, J.H. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. In J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 501-585.
32. Lucking-Reiley, D. Vickrey auctions in practice: From nineteenth-century philately to twenty-first-century e-commerce. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (summer 2000), 183-192.
33. Miller, T.W., and Dickson, P.R. On-line market research. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, 3 (spring 2001), 139-167.
34. Montgomery, A.L., and Bradlow, E.T. Why analyst overconfidence about the functional form of demand models can lead to overpricing. Marketing Science, 18, 4 (1999), 569-583.
35. MRA (Marketing Research Association). The Code of Marketing Research Standards. Glastonbury, CT, 2003.
36. Neill, H.R.; Cummings, R.G.; Ganderton, P.T.; Harrison, G.W.; and McGuckin, T. Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Economics, 70 (May 1994), 145-154.
37. Noussair, C.N.; Robin, S.N.M.I.; and Ruffieux, B. Revealing consumers' willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25 (2004), 725-741.
38. Ockenfels, A., and Roth, A.E. Late and multiple bidding in second price Internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games and Economic Behavior, 55 (2006), 297-320.
39. Park, Y.-H., and Bradlow, E.T. An integrated model for bidding behavior in Internet auctions: Whether, who, when, and how much. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 4 (2005), 470-482.
40. Pavlou, P.A., and Dimoka, A. The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Information Systems Research, 17, 4 (2006), 391-412.
41. Pavlou, P.A., and Dimoka, A. Understanding and mitigating product uncertainty in online auction marketplaces. Industry Studies Conference Paper, 2008 (available at *http://ssrn.com/abstract=1135006/).
42. Pavlou, P.A., and Gefen, D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15, 1 (2004), 27-53.
43. Prelec, D., and Simester, D. Always leave home without it: A further investigation of the credit-card-effect on willingness-to-pay. Marketing Letters, 12 (February 2001), 5-12.
44. Roth, A.E., and Ockenfels, A. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. American Economic Review, 92 (September 2002), 1093-1103.
45. Rothkopf, M.H., and Harstad, R.M. Modeling competitive bidding: A critical essay. Management Science, 40 (March 1994), 364-384.
46. Stafford, M.R., and Stern, B. Consumer bidding behavior on Internet auction sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 1 (fall 2002), 135-150.
47. Standifird, S.S.; Roelofs, M.R.; and Durham, Y. The impact of eBay's buy- it-now function on bidder behavior. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9, 2 (winter 2004), 167-176.
48. Tellis, G.J. The price elasticity of selective demand: A meta-analysis of economic models of sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (November 1988), 331-341.
49. The three survivors. Economist (June 19, 2008), 75-76.
50. Vickrey, W. Counter speculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16 (March 1961), 8-37.
51. Volckner, F. An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers' willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 17, 2 (2006), 137-149.
52. Wang, T.; Venkatesh, R.; and Chatterjee, R. Reservation price as a range: An incentive-compatible measurement approach. Journal of Marketing, 44 (May 2007), 200-213.
53. Wang, W.; Hidvegi, Z.; and Whinston, A.B. Designing mechanisms for e-commerce security: An example from sealed-bid auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2 (winter 2001-2002), 139-156.
54. Ward, S.G., and Clark, J.M. Bidding behavior in on-line auctions: An examination of the eBay Pokemon card market. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 4 (summer 2002), 139-155.
55. Wertenbroch, K., and Skiera, B. Measuring consumers' willingness to pay at the point of purchase. Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (May 2002), 228-241.
56. Wilcox, R.R. Some practical reasons for reconsidering the Kolmogorov- Smirnov test. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, 1 (1997), 9-20.
57. Zeithammer, R. Forward-looking bidding in online auctions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 3 (2006), 462-476.