Some practical reasons for reconsidering the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 9-20

  Wilcox, Rand R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040035580     PISSN: 00071102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1997.tb01098.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Algina, J., Oshima, T. C. & Lin, W.-Y. (1994). Type I error rates for Welch's test and James's second-order test under nonnormality and inequality of variance when there are two groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19, 275-292.
2. Conover, W. J. (1980). Practical Nonpammetric Statistics. New York: Wiley.
3. Cressie, N. A. C. & Whitford, H. J. (1986). How to use the two sample t test. Biometrical Journal, 28, 131-148.
4. Darling, D. A. (1957). The Kolmogorov-Smimov, Cramer-von Mises tests. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28, 823-838.
5. Doksum, K. A. & Sievers, G. L. (1976). Plotting with confidence: Graphical Comparisons of two populations. Biometrika, 63, 421-434.
6. Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D. & Sanders, J. R. (1972) Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237-288.
7. mn, m ≤ n. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 1625-1637.
8. mn, m ≤ n. In H. L. Harter & D. B. Owen (Eds), Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics, vol. I. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
9. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
10. O'Brien, P. C. (1988). Comparing two samples: extensions of the t, rank-sum and log-rank tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 52-61.
11. Randles, R. H. & Wolfe, D. A. (1979). Introduction to the Theory of Nonparametric Statistics. New York: Wiley.
12. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Schroër, G. & Trenkler, D. (1995). Exact and randomization distributions of Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests two or three samples. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 20, 185-202.
14. Wilcox, R. R., Charlin, V. & Thompson, K. L. (1986). New Monte Carlo results on the robustness of the ANOVA F, W, and F* statistics. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 15, 933-944.
15. Wilcox, R. R. (1987). New designs in the analysis of variance. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 29-60.
16. Wilcox, R. R. (1992). Comparing one-step M-estimation of location corresponding to two independent groups. Psychometrika, 57, 141-154.
17. Wilcox, R. R. (1995a). ANOVA: A paradigm for low power and misleading measures of effect size? Review of Educational Research, 65, 51-77.
18. Wilcox, R. R. (1995b). Comparing two independent groups via multiple quantiles. The Statistician, 44, 91-99.
19. Wilcox, R. R. (1996a). Statistics for the Social Sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Wilcox, R. R. (1996b). A note on testing hypotheses about trimmed means. Biometrical Journal, 38, 173-180.
21. Yuen, K. K. (1974). The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances. Biometrika, 61, 165-170.