Polyvalent knowledge and the entrepreneurial university: A third academic revolution?

Critical Sociology

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 595-609

  Etzkowitz, Henry ^a   Viale, Riccardo ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Fondazione Rosselli   (Italy)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurial scientist; Entrepreneurial university; Industrial revolutions; Polyvalent knowledge; Triple helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954259296     PISSN: 08969205     EISSN: 15691632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0896920510365921     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amesse, F. and Cohendet, P. (2001) Technology Transfer Revisited from the Perspective of the Knowledge-Based Economy. Research Policy 30(9):1459-78.
2. Audretsch, D., Link, A. and Scott, J. (2002) Public/Private Technology Partnerships: Evaluating SBIR Supported Research. Research Policy 31(1): 145-58.
3. Beesley, L. (2003) Science Policy in Changing Times: Are Governments Poised to Take Full Advantage of an Institution in Transition? Research Policy 32(8): 1519-32.
4. Carayol, N. (2003) Objectives, Agreements and Matching in Science-Industry Collaborations: Reassembling the Pieces of the Puzzle. Research Policy 32(6): 887-908.
5. Di Gregorio, D. and Shane, S. (2003) Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-Ups than Others? Research Policy 32(2): 209-28.
6. Durkheim, Emile (1997) The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press: New York, NY.
7. Etzkowitz, H. (1983) Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science. Minerva 21(2/3): 198-233.
8. Etzkowitz, H. (2002) MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. Routledge: London and New York, NY.
9. Etzkowitz, H. (2003) Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information 42(3): 293-338.
10. Etzkowitz, H. (2008) The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Routledge: London.
11. Etzkowitz, H. and Mello, J. (2004) The Rise of Triple Helix Cluster: Innovation in Brazilian Economic and Social Development. International Journal of Technology and Management & Sustainable Development 2(3):159-71.
12. Fischer, E. and Lipson, C. (1988) Thinking about Science: Max Delbruck and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Norton: New York, NY.
13. Fodor, J. (1983) Modularity of Mind. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
14. Fransman, M. (2001) Designing Dolly: Interactions between Economics, Technology and Science and the Evolution of Hybrid Institutions. Research Policy 30(2): 263-74.
15. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge. Sage: London.
16. Goldfarb, B. and Henrekson, M. (2003) Bottom-Up versus Top-Down Policies towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property. Research Policy 32(4): 639-58.
17. Griliches, Z. (1988 [1957]) Technology, Education and Productivity: Early Papers with Notes to Subsequent Literature. Blackwell: Oxford.
18. Hayashi, T. (2003) Effect of R&D Programmes on the Formation of University-Industry-Government Networks: Comparative Analysis of Japanese R&D Programmes. Research Policy 32(8):1421-42.
19. Hellstrom, T. (2003) Governing the Virtual Academic Commons. Research Policy 32(3): 391-402.
20. Kuznets, S. (1965) Economic Growth and Structure. Norton: New York, NY.
21. Lazonick, W. (1991) Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
22. Leydesdorff, L. and Meyer, M. (2006) The Triple Helix Indicators of Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems. Research Policy 35(10): 1441-49.
23. Lofsten, H. and Lindelof, P. (2002) Science Parks and the Growth of New Technology Based Firms-Academic-Industry Links, Innovations and Markets. Research Policy 31(6): 859-76.
24. Long, P. (1991) Invention, Authorship, 'Intellectual Property,' and the Origin of Patents: Notes toward a Conceptual History. Technology and Culture 32(4): 846-84.
25. Macleod, C. (1988) Inventing the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
26. Mangematin, V., Lemarié, S., Boissin, J.-P., David, C., Corolleur, F., Coronini, R. and Trommetter, M. (2003) Development of SMEs and Heterogeneity of Trajectories: The Case of Biotechnology in France. Research Policy 32(4): 639-58.
27. Marx, K. (1993) The Grundrisse. Penguin Books: New York, NY.
28. Mazotti, M. (2004) Enlightened Mills: Mechanizing Olive Oil Production in Mediterranean Europe. Technology and Culture 45(2): 277-304.
29. Mokyr, J. (2002) Innovation in an Historical Perspective: Tales of Technology and Evolution. B. Steilet al.(eds.) Technological Innovation and Economic Performance, pp. 24-49. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
30. Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1998) Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century America. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY.
31. Nevins, A. (1962) The State Universities and Democracy. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL.
32. Owen-Smith, J. (2003) From Separate Systems to a Hybrid Order: Accumulative Advantage across Public and Private Science at Research One Universities. Research Policy 2(6): 1081-1104.
33. Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. (2003) The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity. Research Policy 32(9): 1695-1711.
34. Polanyi, K. (1957) The Great Transformation. Beacon Press: Boston, MA.
35. Ranga, L., Debackere, K. and Tunzelman, N. (2003) Entrepreneurial Universities and the Dynamics of Academic Knowledge Production: A Case of Basic vs. Applied Research in Belgium. Scientometrics 58(2): 301-20.
36. Rashdall, H. (1896) The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
37. Rogers, M.E., Yin, Y. and Hoffmann, J. (2000) Assessing the Effectiveness of Technology Transfer Offices at US Research Universities. The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers 12: 47-80.
38. Schiffer, M. (2003) Draw the Lightning Down: Benjamin Franklin and Electrical Technology in the Age of Enlightenment. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.
39. Shinn, T. and Lamy, E. (2006) Paths of Commercial Knowledge: Forms and Consequences of University-Enterprise Synergy in Scientist-Sponsored Firms. Research Policy 35(10): 1465-76.
40. Thursby, J. and Kemp, S. (2002) Growth and Productive Efficiency of University Intellectual Property Licensing. Research Policy 31(1): 109-24.
41. Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K. and Zimmerman, E. (2004) Balancing Entrepreneurial and Scientific Activities: Feasible or Mission Impossible? An Examination of the Performance of University Research Groups at K. U. Leuven, Belgium. Research Policy 33(3): 443-54.
42. Viale, R. (1991) Metodo e Società nella Scienza. Franco Angeli: Milano.