Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry-government networks: Comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes

Research Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1421-1442

  Hayashi, Takayuki ^a  

^a National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation Tokyo   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bibliometric analysis; Japanese R D programme; University industry government linkages

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL TRADE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY;

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0041629546     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00158-0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aldrich H.E., Sasaki T. R&D consortia in the United States and Japan. Research Policy. 24:1995;301-316.
2. Bourke P., Butler L. The efficacy of different modes of funding research: perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences. Research Policy. 28:1999;489-499.
3. Braun D. Who governs intermediate agencies? Principal agent relations in research policy-making. Journal of Public Policy. 13:1993;135-162.
4. Callon, M., Larédo, P., Muster, P. (Eds.), 1997. The strategic management of research and technology. Economica.
5. Committee on the History of Science and Technology Policy (Eds.), 1990. The history of science and technology policy in Japan, (Nihon no Kagaku Gijutsu Seisakushi) in Japanese.
6. Caswell C. Social science policy: challenge, interactions, principals and agents. Science and Public Policy. 25:1998;286-296.
7. Dahl M., Lahlou S. Measurement of network effects from the EC SCIENCE/STIMULATION programmes. Scientometrics. 21:1990;325-342.
8. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The triple helix university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review. 14:1995;14-19.
9. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy. 29:2000;109-123.
10. Gibbons, M., et al., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge, Sage.
11. Godin B., Gingras Y. The place of university in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy. 29:2000;273-278.
12. Goto, A., 1993. Innovation and Industrial Organization in Japan. University of Tokyo Press, in Japanese.
13. Guston D. Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy. Science and Public Policy. 23:1996;229-240.
14. Hwang Hee C., Hirasawa R. Changes in Japanese government policies to be a front-runner in science and technology. Science and Public Policy. 25:1998;47-54.
15. Japanese Technology Evaluation Center, 1996. Japan's ERATO and PRESTO Basic Research Programs. Loyola College.
16. Katz, J.S., Hicks, D., Sharp, M., Martin, B.R., 1995. The Changing Shape of British Science. STEEP special report no. 3.
17. Katz J.S., Martin B.R. What is research collaboration? Research Policy. 26:1997;1-18.
18. Kusunoki T. Organizational innovation in the Japanese basic research: challenges and problems. Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce and Management. 28:1993;37-59.
19. Kobayashi S. Applying audition system from the performing arts to R&D funding mechanisms: quality control in collaboration among the academic, public, private sectors in Japan. Research Policy. 29:2000;181-192.
20. Laredo P. Structural effects of EC RT&D programmes. Scientometrics. 34:1995;473-487.
21. Laredo P. The networks promoted by the framework programme and the question they raise about its formulation and implementation. Research Policy. 27:1998;589-598.
22. MacLean M., Davies C., Lewison G., Anderson J. Evaluating the research activity and impact of funding agencies. Research Evaluation. 7:1998;7-16.
23. Meyer-Krahmer F., Schmoch U. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy. 27:1998;835-851.
24. Narin, F., 1989. The impact of different modes of research funding. In: Evered, D. (Ed.), The Evaluation of Scientific Research. Wiley.
25. Porter, M.E., 1998. On Competition. Harvard Business School Press.
26. Report on the Survey of Research and Development, 1980-2000. Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Government of Japan.
27. Sakakibara M. Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how? Research Policy. 26:1997;447-473.
28. Unit for Policy Research in Science and Medicine (PRISM), 1996. Malaria Research: An Audit of International Activity.
29. van der Mulen B. Science policies as principal-agent games: institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and science. Research Policy. 27:1998;397-414.