Public/private technology partnerships: Evaluating SBIR-supported research

Research Policy

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 145-158

  Audretsch, David B ^a   Link, Albert N ^b   Scott, John T ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^c Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

Innovation; Program evaluation; Public private partnership; Small business

Indexed keywords

EID: 31244435827     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00158-X     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Audretsch, D.B., Link, A.N., Scott, J.T., 2000a. Statistical analysis of the national academy of sciences survey of small business innovation research awardees: analyzing the influence of the fast track program. In: Wessner, C.W. (Ed.), The Small Business Innovation Research Program. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 291-306.
2. Audretsch, D.B., Weigand, J., Weigand, C, 2000b. Does the small business innovation research program foster entrepreneurial behavior? Evidence from Indiana. In: Wessner, C.W. (Ed.), The Small Business Innovation Research Program. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 160-193.
3. Baldwin, W.L., Scott, J.T., 1987. Market Structure and Technological Change. Harwood, London.
4. Baron, J., 1998. DoD SBIR/STTR Program Manager, Comments at the Methodology Workshop on the Assessment of Current SBIR Program Initiatives, Washington, DC, October.
5. Cahill, P., 2000. Fast track, is it speeding commercialization of the department of defense small business innovation research projects. In: Wessner, C.W. (Ed.), The Small Business Innovation Research Program. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 43-103.
6. Gans, J.S., Stem S., 2000. When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit? Evidence from the SBIR program. NBER Working Paper No. 7877, September.
7. Jaffe, A.B., 1998. The importance of spillovers in the policy mission of the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer 23, 11-19.
8. Kealey, T., 1997. The Economic Laws of Scientific Research. MacMillan, London.
9. Klette, T.J., Moen, J., Griliches, Z., 2000. Do subsidies to commercial RandD reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy 29, 471195.
10. Lerner, J., 1999. The government as venture capitalist: the long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business 72, 285-318.
11. Lerner, J., Kegler, C., 2000. Evaluating the small business innovation research program: a literature review. In: Wessner, C.W. (Ed.), The Small Business Innovation Research Program. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 307-324.
12. Link, A.N., 1999. Public/private partnerships in the United States. Industry and innovation 6, 191-217.
13. Link, A.N., 2000. An assessment of the small business innovation research fast track program in southeastern states. In: Wessner, C.W. (Ed.), The Small Business Innovation Research Program. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 194-210.
14. Link, A.N., Scott, J.T., 1998. Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
15. Link, A.N., Scott, J.T., 2000. Estimates of the social returns to small business innovation research projects. In: Wessner, C.W. (Ed.), The Small Business Innovation Research Program. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 275-290.
16. Link, A.N., Scott, J.T., 2001. Public/private partnerships: stimulating competition in a dynamic market. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19, 763-794.
17. Martin, S., Scott, J.T., 2000. The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy 29, 437-447.
18. Office of Management and Budget, 1992. Economic Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive Order 12866, mimeographed.
19. Scott, J.T., 1998. Financing and leveraging public/private partnerships: the hurdle-lowering auction. STI Review 23, 67-84.
20. Scott, J.T., 2000a. An assessment of the small business innovation research program in New England: fast-track compared with non-fast track projects. In: Wessner, C.W. (Ed.), The Small Business Innovation Research Program. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 104-140.
21. Scott, J.T., 2000b. The directions for technological change: alternative economic majorities and opportunity costs. Review of Industrial Organization 17, 1-17.
22. Tibbetts, R., 1999. The Small Business Innovation Research Program and NSF SBIR Commercialization Results, mimeograph.
23. Wallsten, S., 2000. The effects of government-industry RandD programs on private RandD: the case of the small business innovation research program. Rand Journal of Economics 31, 82-100.