Expressive robots in education: Varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 3, Issue , 2010, Pages 1613-1622

  Saerbeck, Martin ^a,b   Schut, Tom ^a   Bartneck, Christoph ^b   Janse, Maddy D ^a  

^a PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

education; human robot interaction; social interaction; tutoring

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL TOOLS; EMOTIONAL EXPRESSIONS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTIONS; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; LANGUAGE LEARNING; LEARNING EFFICIENCY; LEARNING PERFORMANCE; MEDIA IN EDUCATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; TRAINING PROGRAM; VIRTUAL AGENT;

EDUCATION COMPUTING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS; STUDENTS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 77954157005     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753567     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. J. Alderson, C. Clapham, and D. Wall. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
2. M. Barrera, I. Sandler, and T. Ramsay. Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4):435-447, 1981.
3. C. Bartneck, J. Reichenbach, and A. van Breemen. In your face, robot! The influence of a character's embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions. In Proceedings of the Design and Emotion 2004 Conference, Ankara, Turkey, pages 32-51, 2004.
4. C. Bartneck, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and T. Nomura. The influence of people's culture and prior experiences with AIBO on their attitude towards robots. AI & Society The Journal of Human-Centred Systems, 21(1), 2006.
5. A. v. Breemen. Bringing robots to life: Applying principles of animation to robots. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Shaping Human-Robot Interaction - Understanding the Social Aspects of Intelligent Robotic Products. In Cooperation with the CHI2004 Conference, Vienna, Apr. 2004.
6. J. Brophy. Research linking teacher behavior to student achievement: Potential implications for instruction of chapter 1 students. In Designs for Compensatory Education: Conference Proceedings and Papers, page 60p., 1986.
7. J. Casper and R. Murphy. Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the world trade center. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 33(3):367-385, 2003.
8. L. Darling-Hammond. Teacher quality and student achievement:A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1):1-48, 2000.
9. K. Dautenhahn. Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 362(1480):679-704, Apr. 2007. (Pubitemid 47056835)
10. D. Dehn and S. van Mulken. The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computers Studies, 52(1):1-22, 2000.
11. D. Feil-Seifer and M. Mataric. Defining socially assistive robotics. In Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. 9th International Conference on, pages 465-468, 2005.
12. T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4):143-166, March 2003.
13. D. Goldhaber. The mystery of good teaching. Education Next, 2(1):50-55, 2002.
14. M. A. Goodrich, T. W. McLain, J. D. Anderson, J. Sun, and J. W. Crandall. Managing autonomy in robot teams: Observations from four experiments. In HRI, pages 25-32, 2007.
15. M. A. Goodrich and A. C. Schultz. Human-robot interaction: A survey. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact., 1(3):203-275, 2007.
16. P. Hardre. Beyond two decades of motivation: A review of the research and practice in instructional design and human performance technology. Human Resource Development Review, 2(1):54, 2003.
17. C. Hongpaisanwiwat and M. Lewis. The effects of animated character in multimedia presentation: Attention and comprehension. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003. IEEE International Conference on, volume 2, pages 1350-1352, Oct. 2003.
18. R. Jackson and E. Fagan. Collaboration and learning within immersive virtual reality. In Proceedings of the third international conference on Collaborative virtual environments, pages 83-92. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2000.
19. A. Jasman. The role of teacher educators in the promotion, support and assurance of teacher quality. http://www.atea.schools.net.au/atea/papers/jasman. pdf, 2001.
20. W. Johnson, J. Rickel, and J. Lester. Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(1):47-78, 2000.
21. W. Johnson, P. Rizzo, W. Bosma, S. Kole, M. Ghijsen, and H. Van Welbergen. Generating socially appropriate tutorial dialog. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3068:254-264, 2004.
22. S. E. Kisa. Toki pona. Online source: http://www.tokipona.org (accessed Jan. 2009), 2007.
23. C. Langford, J. Bowsher, J. Maloney, and P. Lillis. Social support: A conceptual analysis. J Adv Nurs, 25(1):95-100, 1997.
24. Lego ®. Mindstorms NXT. Online source: http://mindstorms.lego.com, 2007.
25. J. C. Lester, S. A. Converse, S. E. Kahler, S. T. Barlow, B. A. Stone, and R. S. Bhogal. The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In CHI '97: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 359-366, New York, NY, USA, 1997. ACM.
26. S. P. Linder, B. E. Nestrick, S. Mulders, and C. L. Lavelle. Facilitating active learning with inexpensive mobile robots. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 16(4):21-33, 2001.
27. E. McAuley. Psychometric Properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a Competitive Sport Setting: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1):48-58, 1989.
28. R. Moreno, R. Mayer, H. Spires, and J. Lester. The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, pages 177-213, 2001.
29. O. Mubin, S. Shahid, C. Bartneck, E. Krahmer, M. Swerts, and L. Feijs. Using language tests and emotional expressions to determine the learnability of artificial languages. In CHI 2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 4075-4080, 2009.
30. S. Parise, S. Kiesler, L. Sproull, and K. Waters. Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(2):123-142, 1999.
31. A. Powers, S. Kiesler, S. Fussell, and C. Torrey. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pages 145-152, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press.
32. B. Reeves and C. Nass. The Media Equation : How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places (CSLI Lecture Notes (Hardcover)). The Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications, September 1996.
33. M. Saerbeck and A. J. van Breemen. Design guidelines and tools for creating believable motion for personal robots. In Robot and Human interactive Communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007. The 16th IEEE International Symposium on, pages 386-391, 2007.
34. N. Shin and S. Kim. Learning about, from, and with Robots: Students' Perspectives. In Robot and Human interactive Communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007. The 16th IEEE International Symposium on, pages 1040-1045, 2007.
35. K. Shinozawa, F. Naya, J. Yamato, and K. Kogure. Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2):267-279, 2005.
36. E. Strommen and K. Alexander. Emotional interfaces for interactive aardvarks: designing affect into social interfaces for children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, pages 528-535. ACM New York, NY, USA, 1999.
37. R. Tiberius. The why of teacher/student relationships. Essays on teaching excellence, Professional and Organizational Development (POD) reading packet 10(4), 1993.
38. R. Tiberius and J. Billson. The social context of teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 45:67-86, 1991.
39. X. Tu. Artificial Animals for Computer Animation: Biomechanics, Locomotion, Perception, and Behavior, volume 1635/1999 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin, 1999.
40. A. van Breemen and Y. Xue. Advanced animation engine for user-interface robots. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pages 1824-1830. IEEE CNF, Oct 2006.
41. A. Wayne and P. Youngs. Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1):89, 2003.
42. J. Yamato, R. Brooks, K. Shinozawa, and F. Naya. Human-robot dynamic social interaction. NTT Tech Rev., 1(6):37-43, 2003.