Generating socially appropriate tutorial dialog

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3068, Issue , 2004, Pages 254-264

  Lewis Johnson, W ^a   Rizzo, Paola ^b   Bosma, Wauter ^c   Kole, Sander ^c   Ghijsen, Mattijs ^c   Van Welbergen, Herwin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOTIVATION; SPEECH PROCESSING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOFTWARE AGENTS; STUDENTS;

AFFECTIVE STATE; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS;

TEACHING; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

ANIMATED AGENTS; PEDAGOGICAL EVENTS; STUDENT-TUTOR COACHING DIALOGS;

EID: 9444237976     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. André E. Rist, T., & Müller, J. (1998). Guiding the user through dynamically generated hypertext presentations with a life-like character. Intl. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, 21-28. New York: ACM Press.
2. Baylor, A.L. & Ebbers, S. (July, 2003). Evidence that Multiple Agents Facilitate Greater Learning. International Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-ED) Conference, Sydney, Australia.
3. Ball, G. & Breese, J. (2001). Emotion and personality in a conversational agent. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, & E. Churchill (Eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents, 189-219. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bloom, B.S. (ed.) (1956), Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I, cognitive domain. London: Longman.
5. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cassell, J. & Bickmore, T., Negotiated Collusion: Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13, 1-2, 2003, 89-132.
7. Dessouky, M.M., Verma, S., Bailey, D., & Rickel, J. (2001). A methodology for developing a Web-based factory simulator for manufacturing education. IEE Transactions 33, 167-180.
8. Gratch, J. & Marsella, S. (2001). Tears and fears: Modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents. In J.P. Müller, E. André, & S. Sen (Eds.), Proc. of the Fifth Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Agents, 278-285. New York: ACM Press.
9. Johnson, W.L. (2003). Interaction tactics for socially intelligent pedagogical agents. Int'l Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, 251-253. New York: ACM Press.
10. Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W., and Lester, J.C. (2000): Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, (2000) 47-78
11. Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Lepper, M.R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D., & Gurtner, J. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S.P. Lajoie and S.J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools, 75-105. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., and Bhogal, R. S. (1997). The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of CHI '97, 359-366.
14. Marsella, S.C., Johnson, W.L., & LaBore, C.M. (2003). Interactive pedagogical drama for health interventions. In U. Hoppe et al. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies, 341-348. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
15. Miller C. (ed.), Etiquette for Human-Computer Work. Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium, AAAI Technical Report FS-02-02, 2002.
16. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H.A., & Lester, J.C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction 19(2), (2001) 177-213
17. Heylen, D., Nijholt, A., op den Akker, R., & Vissers, M. (2003). Socially intelligent tutor agents. S ocial Intelligence Design Workshop.
18. Picard, R. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Pilkington, R.M. (1999). Analysing educational discourse: The DISCOUNT scheme. Technical report 99/2, Computer-Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
20. Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2004). Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
21. Prendinger, H. and Ishizuka, M. (Eds.) (2004). Life-like Characters. Tools, Affective Functions, and Applications. Cognitive Technologies Series, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
22. Qu, L., Wang, N., & Johnson, W.L. (2004). Choosing when to interact with learners. Int'l Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York: ACM Press.
23. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. New York: Cambridge University Press
24. Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Johnson, W.L. (2002). An agent that helps children to author rhetorically structured digital puppet presentations. In S.A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 903-912. Berlin: Springer.
25. Sansone, C. and Harackiewicz, J.M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego: Academic Press.
26. Del Soldato, T. & du Boulay, B. (1995). Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 6(4), 337-378.
27. De Vicente, A. & Pain, H. (2002). Informing the detection of the students' motivatonal state: An empirical study. In S.A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 933-943. Berlin: Springer.
28. Zhou X. and Conati C., Inferring User Goals from Personality and Behavior in a Causal Model of User Affect. In Proceedings of IUI 2003, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2003.