In the spirit of scholarship

Academy of Management Learning and Education

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 282-298

  Peng, Mike W ^a   Dess, Gregory G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954114716     PISSN: 1537260X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMLE.2010.51428549     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. AACSB. 2008. Final report of AACSB Impact of Research Task Force. Tampa, FL: AACSB.
2. Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. 2009. When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1): 72-95.
3. Agarwal, R., & Hoetker, G. 2007. A Faustian bargain? The growth of management and its relationship with related disciplines. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1304-1322.
4. Argyris, C. A. 1977. Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5): 115-125.
5. Baldridge, D. C., Floyd, S. W., & Markoczy, L. 2004. Are managers from Mars and academicians from Venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1063-1074.
6. Baumol, W. J. 2004. Red-queen games: Arms races, rule of law, and market economies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14: 237-247.
7. Bazerman, M. H. 2002. Judgment in managerial decision making, 5th ed. New York: Wiley.
8. Becker, E., Lindsay, C. M., & Grizzle, G. 2003. The derived demand for faculty research. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24: 549-567. (Pubitemid 40465169)
9. Bennis, W. G., & O'Toole, J. 2005. How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5): 96-104.
10. Beyer, J., & Trice, H. 1982. The utilization process: A conceptual framework and the synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 591-622.
11. Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M. 2009. Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4): 19-32.
12. Certo, S. T., Sirmon, D., & Brymer, R. In Press. Competition and scholarly productivity in management: Investigating changes in scholarship from 1988 to 2008. Academy of Management Learning & Education.
13. Collins, J. 2009. How the mighty fall. BusinessWeek. May 25: 27.
14. Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. 2007. Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1281-1303.
15. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. 2008. Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization Science, 19: 177-183.
16. D'Aveni, R. 2002. The empire strikes back. Harvard Business Review, 80(11): 66-74.
17. Davies, S., & Geroski, P. 1997. Changes in concentration, turbulence, and the dynamics of market shares. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79: 383-391. (Pubitemid 127114983)
18. Davis, H. L., & Hogarth, R. M. 1992. Rethinking management education: A view from Chicago. The University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business, Selected Paper No. 72: 1-29.
19. Davis, M. 1971. That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Sciences. 3: 309-344.
20. DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Zimmerman, J. L. 2005. What's really wrong with US business schools? Working paper, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California.
21. DeNisi, A. 2009. Presidential address at the Academy of Management meetings, Chicago, August 9.
22. Derfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. M., & Smith K. G. 2008. The Red Queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 61-80.
23. Dess, G. G., & Markoczy, L. 2008. Rather than searching for the silver bullet, use rubber bullets: A view on the researchpractice gap. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44: 57-62.
24. Eisenberg, L. 1977. The social imperatives of medical research. Science, 198: 1106.
25. Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1): 75-91.
26. Giacalone, R. A. 2009. Academic rankings in research institutions: A case of skewed mind-sets and professional amnesia. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1): 122-126.
27. Gioia, D. A., & Corley, K. G. 2002. Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1: 107-120.
28. Hambrick, D. C. 2007. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1346-1352.
29. Harzing, A.-W. 2008. Arbitrary decisions in ranking studies: A commentary on Xu, Yalcinkaya, and Seggie (2008). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 685-689.
30. Jain, D. C., & Golosinski, M. 2009. Sizing up the tyranny of the ruler. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1): 99-105.
31. Khurana, R. 2007. From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unful-filled promise of management as a profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. 2009. Why the rigor-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 516-533.
33. Knights, D. 2008. Myopic rhetorics: Reflecting espitemologically and ethically on the demand for relevance in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(4): 537-552.
34. Lee, S.-H., Yamakawa, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2007. Entrepreneurship and barriers to exit: How does an entrepreneur-friendly bankruptcy law affect entrepreneurship development at a societal level. Paper presented at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Madrid, Spain, June 2007, and posted at www.sba.gov/advo/research/ rs326tot.pdf.
35. Lee, T. W. 2009. The management professor. Academy of Management Review, 34: 196-199.
36. Leung, K. 2007. The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 510-513.
37. Macdonald, S., & Kam, J. 2007. Ring a ring o'Roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 640-655.
38. March, J. G., & Reed, J. S. 2000. Citigroup's John Reed and Stanford's James March on management research and practice. Academy of Management Executive, 14(1): 52-64.
39. Markoczy, L., & Deeds, D. L. 2009. Theory building at the intersection: Recipe for impact or road to nowhere? Journal of Management Studies, 46(6): 1076-1088.
40. McGrath, R. G. 2007. No longer a stepchild: How the management field can come into its own. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1365-1378.
41. Miller, C. C., Glick, W. H., & Cardinal, L. B. 2005. The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science: Accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 489-516.
42. Mintzberg, H. 2004. Managers, not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
43. Mitchell, T. 2007. The academic life: Realistic changes needed for business school students and faculty. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(2): 236-251.
44. Mitra, D., & Golder, P. N. 2008. Does academic research help or hurt MBA programs? Journal of Marketing, 72 (September): 31-49.
45. Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. 2008. Same as it ever was: Recognizing stability in the BusinessWeek rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1): 26-41.
46. Mudambi, R., Peng, M. W., & Weng, D. 2008. Research rankings of Asia Pacific business schools: Global versus local knowledge strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 171-188.
47. O'Brien, J. P., Drnevich, P. L., Crook, T. R., & Armstrong, C. E. In Press. Does business school research add economic value for students? Academy of Management Learning and Education.
48. Palmer, D. 2006. Taking stock of the criteria we use to evaluate one another's work: ASQ 50 years out. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 535-559.
49. Peng, M. W. 2000. Business strategies in transition economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Peng, M. W. 2004. Identifying the big question in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 99-108.
51. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4): 63-81.
52. Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. 2006. Most cited articles and authors in global strategy research. Journal of International Management, 12: 490-508.
53. Pfeffer, J. 2007. A modest proposal: How we might change the process and product of managerial research. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1334-1345.
54. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. 2002. The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1: 78-95.
55. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. 2004. The business school "business:" Some lessons from the US experience. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 1501-1520.
56. Podolny, J. M. 2009. The buck stops (and starts) at business school. Harvard Business Review, 87(6): 60-67.
57. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. 2003. Saving capitalism from the capitalists. New York: Crown Business.
58. Rynes, S. L. 2007. AMJ turns 50! Looking back and looking ahead. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1277-1279.
59. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. 1989. Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 745-772.
60. Shareef, R. 2007. Want better business theories? Maybe Karl Popper has the answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6: 272-280.
61. Simon, H. A. 1967. The business school: A problem in organizational design. Journal of Management Studies, 4: 1-16.
62. Tjosvold, D. 2008. Constructive controversy for management education: Developing committed, open-minded researchers. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7: 73-85.
63. Trieschmann, J. S., Dennis, A. R., Northcraft, G. B., & Niemi, A. W. 2000. Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: MBA programs versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1130-1141.
64. U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). 2008. Best Paper Award by Advocacy at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference presented to Seung-Hyun Lee, Yasuhiro Yamakawa, and Mike W. Peng at the University of Texas at Dallas. SBA Office of Advocacy press release, June 6. Washington, DC: SBA. www.sba.gov/advo/press/08-14.html.
65. Van Fleet, D. D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. 2000. A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management, 26: 839-861.
66. Vermeulen, F. 2007. "I shall not remain insignificant": Adding a second loop to matter more. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 754-761.
67. Walsh, J. P., Tushman, M. L., Kimberly, J. R., Starbuck, B., & Ashford, S. 2007. On the relationship between research and practice: Debate and reflections. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16: 128-154.
68. Weick, K. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. New York: Random House.
69. Whittington, R. 1993. What is strategy-and does it matter. London: Routledge.
70. Worrell, D. L. 2009. Assessing business scholarship: The difficulties in moving beyond the rigor-relevance paradigm trap. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8: 127-130.
71. Xu, S., Yalcinkaya, G., & Seggie, S. H. 2008a. Are decisions "arbitrary" in our international business ranking study? A response to Harzing (2008). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 691-695.
72. Xu, S., Yalcinkaya, G., & Seggie, S. H. 2008b. Prolific authors and institutions in leading international business journals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 189-207.