Research rankings of Asia Pacific business schools: Global versus local knowledge strategies

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 171-188

  Mudambi, Ram ^a,b   Peng, Mike W ^c   Weng, David H ^c  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Asian Pacific business schools; Productivity; Rankings; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149135362     PISSN: 02174561     EISSN: 15729958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-008-9086-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agrawal, A., & Cockburn, I. 2003. The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21: 1227-1253.
2. Armstrong, J. S. 1995. The Devil's advocate responds to an MBA student's claim that research harms learning. Journal of Marketing, 59: 101-106.
3. Au, K. 2007. Self-confidence does not come isolated from the environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 491-496.
4. Baden-Fuller, C., Ravazzolo, F., & Schweizer, T. 2000. Making and measuring reputations: The research rankings of European business schools. Long Range Planning, 33: 621-650.
5. Brouthers, K. D., Mudambi, R., & Reeb, D. M. 2005. The homerun hypothesis: Influencing the boundaries of knowledge. Working paper available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015588.
6. Carlsson, B., & Mudambi, R. 2003. Globalization, entrepreneurship and public policy: A systems view. Industry and Innovation, 10: 103-116.
7. Chan, K. C., Fung, H. G., & Lai, P. 2005. Membership of the editorial boards and rankings of schools with international business orientation. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 452-469.
8. Chan, K. C., Chen, C. R., & Cheng, L. T. W. 2006. A ranking of accounting research output in the European region. Accounting and Business Research, 36: 3-17.
9. Ehrenberg, R. 2005. Going broke by degree: A review essay. Journal of Labor Research, 26: 739-752.
10. Gioia, D. A., & Corley, K. G. 2002. Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1: 107-120.
11. Harzing, A. 2005. Australian research output in economics and business: High volume, low impact? Australian Journal of Management, 30: 183-200.
12. Hofstede, G. 2007. Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 411-420.
13. Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. 2004. Ranking the international business schools: Faculty publications as the measure. Management International Review, 44: 213-228.
14. Lau, C. M. 2007. The first decade of the Asia Academy of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 401-410.
15. Leung, K. 2007. The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 510-513.
16. Li, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Developing theory from strategic management research in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25 (in press).
17. Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 119-137.
18. Meyer, K. E. 2007. Asian contexts and the search for general theory in management research: A rejoinder. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 527-534.
19. Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 600-621.
20. Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 385-406.
21. Peng, M. W. 2005. From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 123-141.
22. Peng, M. W. 2007. Celebrating 25 years of Asia Pacific management research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 385-393.
23. Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. 2006. Most cited articles and authors in global strategy research. Journal of International Management, 12: 490-508.
24. Pleggenkuhle-Miles, E. G., Aroul, R. R., Sun, S. L., & Su, Y. S. 2007. The adolescence of Asia management research: APJM, 1997-2006. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 467-489.
25. Pocklington, T., & Tupper, A. 2002. No place to learn: Why universities aren't working. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
26. Pomfret, R., & Wang, C. W. 2003. Evaluating the research output of Australian universities' economics departments. Australian Economic Papers, 42: 418-441.
27. Quer, D., Claver, E., & Rienda, L. 2007. Business and management in China: A review of empirical research in leading international journals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 359-384.
28. Ramaswamy, K. 2007. Asian management research needs broader initiatives and focused incentives. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 519-525.
29. Robinson, P. 1994. Snapshots from hell. New York: Warner Books.
30. Schmotter, J. W. 2001. Making sense of the rankings. Selections, 1: 2.
31. Schramm, C. J. 2006. The broken MBA. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52: B16.
32. Siemens, J., Burton, S., Jensen, T., & Mendoza, N. 2005. An examination of the relationship between research productivity in prestigious business journals and popular press business school rankings. Journal of Business Research, 58: 467-476.
33. Tracy, J., & Waldfogel, J. 1997. The best business schools: A market-based approach. Journal of Business, 70: 1-31.
34. Trieschmann, J. S., Dennis, A. R., Northcraft, G. B., & Niemi Jr., A. W. 2000. Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M.B.A. program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1130-1141.
35. Xu, S., Yalcinkaya, G., & Seggie, S. 2008. Prolific authors and institutions in leading international business journals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25 (in press).
36. Yang, X., & Terjesen, S. 2007. In search of confidence: Context, collaboration, and constraints. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 497-507.