Academy of Management Journal editors' forum: AMJ turns 50! looking back and looking ahead

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1277-1279

  Rynes, Sara L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949116653     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.28165846     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Agarwal, R., & Hoetker, G. 2007. A Faustian bargain? The growth of management and its relationship with related disciplines. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1304-1322.
2. Bartunek, J. M. 2007. Academic-practitional collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1323-1333.
3. Biehl, M., Kim, H., & Wade, M. 2006. Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega, 34: 359-371.
4. Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. 2007. Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1281-1303.
5. Gordon, R. A., & Howell, J. E. 1959. Higher education for business. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Hambrick, D. C. 2007. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1346-1352.
7. March, J. G. 2005. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1: 5-22.
8. McGrath, R. G. 2007. No longer a stepchild: How the management field can come into its own. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1365-1378.
9. Pfeffer, J. 2007. A modest proposal: How we might change the process and product of managerial research. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1334-1345.
10. Pierson, F. C. 1959. The education of American businessmen. New York: McGraw- Hill.
11. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2005. The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 473-488.
12. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371-384.
13. Tahai, A., & Meyer, M. 1999. A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 279-296.
14. Tsui, A. A. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the Academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1353-1364.
15. Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and research knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Wiseman, R. M., & Skilton, P. F. 1999. Divisions and differences: Exploring publication preferences and productivity across management subfields. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8: 299-320.