Faculty development through an Educational Action Programme

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 107-120

  Stigmar, Martin ^a  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Faculty development work; Implementation; Transformation strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954030617     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360701805242     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research,1, 7-23.
2. Anderson, G., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A.S. (1994). Studying your own school. An educator's guide to qualitative practitioner research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.
3. Baird, J. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study. European Journal of Science Education,8, 263-282.
4. Dall'Alba, G. (2005). Improving teaching: Enhancing ways of being university teachers. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 361-372.
5. Dearlove, J. (2002). A continuing role for academics: The governance of UK universities in the post-Dearing era. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 257-275.
6. Development Plan for Växjö University 2005-08. (2004). Utvecklingsplan för Växjö universitet 2005-2008. Confirmed by the University Board on December 6, 2004. Växjö University, Växjö, Sweden.
7. Educational Action Programme. (2006). Pedagogiskt handlingsprogram: Från kunskapsförmedling till kunskapsbildning 2004-2006. (From conveying to creating knowledge). Retrieved May 9, 2006, from http://www.vxu.se/org/upc/pdf_filer/ped_handl.pdf
8. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
9. Gibbs, G. (2004). Implementing learning and teaching strategies. The Open University. Retrieved December 6, 2004, from http://www.ncteam.ac.uk
10. Government Proposition 2001/02:15. (2001). Regeringens proposition (2001/02:15). Den öppna högskolan. (The Open University). Stockholm: Parliament Printing Office.
11. Healy, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 169-189.
12. Hedin, A. (2004). Från ideal till praxis! Hur behandlas policyprogram på institutionsnivå? En granskning av hur det pedagogiska programmet vid Uppsala universitet har mottagits. (From ideal to practice! How are policy programmes dealt with at the department level? A study of how the educational programme at Uppsala University has been received.) Report series from the Unit for Developing Education and Interactive Learning. Report no. 3, June 2004.
13. Ho, A., Watkins, D., & Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education,42, 143-169.
14. Holmberg, E., Jenner, H., Jerreling, L., & Vahlne, L. (1997). Pedagogisk profil-frihet-ansvar-kompetens. Sammanställt av Högskolegruppen för pedagogik. Vårdhögskolan i Växjö. Landstinget i Kronobergslän. (Pedagogical profile-freedom-responsibility-competence. Compiled by the University Pedagogics Group, Växjö Nursing College). Kronoberg County Council.
15. Jarvis, P. (2000). The changing university: Meeting a need and needing to change. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(1), 43-67.
16. Johnston, S. (1997). Educational development units: Aiming for a balanced approach to supporting teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(3), 331-342.
17. Karlsson, J., & Lundberg, E. (2003). Växjödoktoranderna och deras forskarutbildningar. (Växjö Ph.D. students and their research programmes). Report no. 20. The School of Social Sciences, Växjö University, Växjö, Sweden.
18. Land, R. (2004). Educational development. Discourse, identity and practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
19. Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching-scholarship'. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 213-228.
20. Macdonald, C., & Stratta, E. (2001). From access to widening participation: Responses to the changing population in higher education in the UK. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(2), 249-258.
21. Marton, M., & Morris, P. (Eds.). (2002). What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
22. Meister-Scheytt, C., & Scheytt, T. (2005). The complexity of change in universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(1), 76-99.
23. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Prentice Hall.
24. Newton, J. (2002). Barriers to effective quality management and leadership: Case study of two academic departments. Higher Education,44, 185-212.
25. Rubeck, R. F., & Witzke, D. B. (1998). Faculty development: A field of dreams. Academic Medicine, 73(9), 32-37.
26. Schratz, M. (1993). Crossing the disciplinary boundaries: Professional development through action research in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 12(2), 131-142.
27. Skelton, A. (2004). Understanding "teaching excellence" in higher education: A critical evaluation of the National Teaching Fellowships Scheme. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 451-468.
28. Slater, G. R. L. (1991). Staff development programmes in universities: A curriculum proposal. Higher Education Research & Development, 10(1), 79-91.
29. Statens Offentliga Utredningar. (2001:13). Nya villkor för lärandet i den högre utbildningen. (New conditions for higher education learning). Stockholm: Fritze Publications.
30. Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change. New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Buckingham, UK: SHRE & Open University Press.
31. Trowler, P., & Bamber, R. (2005). Compulsory higher education teacher training: Joined-up policies, institutional architectures and enhancement cultures. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(2), 79-93.
32. Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 221-240.
33. Walker, M (2003). Framing social justice in education: What does the 'capabilities' approach offer? British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 168-187.
34. Webb, G., & Murphy, D. (1997). Organisational approaches to staff development to support teaching and learning. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teacher's Professional Development, 4(1), 15-29.
35. Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., & Sorensen, D. (1998). The department as double agent: The call for department change and renewal. Innovative Higher Education, 22(3), 203-215.