Plant development goes like clockwork

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 296-306

  de Montaigu, Amaury ^a   Tóth, Réka ^a   Coupland, George ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PLANT BREEDING RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; FLOWERING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GERMINATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LIFE CYCLE STAGE; PLANT STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 77953911604     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.04.003     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Covington M.F., et al. Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol. 2008, 9:R130.
2. Michael T.P., McClung C.R. Enhancer trapping reveals widespread circadian clock transcriptional control in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132:629-639.
3. Harmer S.L., et al. Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 2000, 290:2110-2113.
4. Hazen S.P., et al. Exploring the transcriptional landscape of plant circadian rhythms using genome tiling arrays. Genome Biol. 2009, 10:R17.
5. McClung C.R. Comes a time. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:514-520.
6. Harmer S.L. The circadian system in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60:357-377.
7. Mas P., Yanovsky M.J. Time for circadian rhythms: plants get synchronized. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:574-579.
8. Yakir E., et al. Regulation of output from the plant circadian clock. FEBS J. 2007, 274:335-345.
9. Millar A.J. Molecular intrigue between phototransduction and the circadian clock. Ann. Bot. 1998, 81:581-587.
10. Harmer S.L., et al. Molecular bases of circadian rhythms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 17:215-253.
11. Devlin P.F., Kay S.A. Circadian photoperception. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2001, 63:677-694.
12. Troein C., et al. Weather and seasons together demand complex biological clocks. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1961-1964.
13. Ouyang Y., et al. Resonating circadian clocks enhance fitness in cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:8660-8664.
14. Johnson C.H. Endogenous timekeepers in photosynthetic organisms. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2001, 63:695-728.
15. Dodd A.N., et al. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 2005, 309:630-633.
16. Nozue K., et al. Rhythmic growth explained by coincidence between internal and external cues. Nature 2007, 448:358-361.
17. Millar A.J., Kay S.A. Integration of circadian and phototransduction pathways in the network controlling CAB gene transcription in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93:15491-15496.
18. Penfield S., Hall A. A role for multiple circadian clock genes in the response to signals that break seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1722-1732.
19. Salome P.A., et al. Circadian timekeeping during early Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:1110-1125.
20. Zhong H.H., et al. Imbibition, but not release from stratification, sets the circadian clock in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 1998, 10:2005-2017.
21. Kikis E.A., et al. ELF4 is a phytochrome-regulated component of a negative feedback loop involving the central oscillator components CCA1 and LHY. Plant J. 2005, 44:300-313.
22. Hanano S., et al. Multiple phytohormones influence distinct parameters of the plant circadian clock. Genes Cells 2006, 11:1381-1392.
23. Covington M.F., Harmer S.L. The circadian clock regulates auxin signaling and responses in Arabidopsis. PLOS Biol. 2007, 5:1773-1784.
24. Dodd A.N., et al. The Arabidopsis circadian clock incorporates a cADPR-based feedback loop. Science 2007, 318:1789-1792.
25. Mizuno T., Yamashino T. Comparative transcriptome of diurnally oscillating genes and hormone-responsive genes in Arabidopsis thaliana: insight into circadian clock-controlled daily responses to common ambient stresses in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49:481-487.
26. Legnaioli T., et al. TOC1 functions as a molecular switch connecting the circadian clock with plant responses to drought. EMBO J. 2009, 28:3745-3757.
27. Kurup S., et al. Interactions of the developmental regulator ABI3 with proteins identified from developing Arabidopsis seeds. Plant J. 2000, 21:143-155.
28. Castells E., et al. A functional connection between the clock component TOC1 and abscisic acid signaling pathways. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5:409-411.
29. Vandenbussche F., et al. Of light and length: regulation of hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis. Bioessays 2005, 27:275-284.
30. Salter M.G., et al. Gating of the rapid shade-avoidance response by the circadian clock in plants. Nature 2003, 426:680-683.
31. Michael T.P., et al. A morning-specific phytohormone gene expression program underlying rhythmic plant growth. PLOS Biol. 2008, 6:e225.
32. Duek P.D., Fankhauser C. bHLH class transcription factors take centre stage in phytochrome signalling. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10:51-54.
33. de Lucas M., et al. A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature 2008, 451:480-484.
34. Feng S., et al. Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature 2008, 451:475-479.
35. Rawat R., et al. REVEILLE1, a Myb-like transcription factor, integrates the circadian clock and auxin pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:16883-16888.
36. Loudet O., et al. A zinc knuckle protein that negatively controls morning-specific growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:17193-17198.
37. Loros J.J., Dunlap J.C. Genetic and molecular analysis of circadian rhythms in Neurospora. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2001, 63:757-794.
38. Gould P.D., et al. The molecular basis of temperature compensation in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1177-1187.
39. Bieniawska Z., et al. Disruption of the Arabidopsis circadian clock is responsible for extensive variation in the cold-responsive transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:263-279.
40. Fowler S.G., et al. Low temperature induction of Arabidopsis CBF1, 2, and 3 is gated by the circadian clock. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137:961-968.
41. Maruyama K., et al. Identification of cold-inducible downstream genes of the Arabidopsis DREB1A/CBF3 transcriptional factor using two microarray systems. Plant J. 2004, 38:982-993.
42. Kidokoro S., et al. The phytochrome-interacting factor PIF7 negatively regulates DREB1 expression under circadian control in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151:2046-2057.
43. Mikkelsen M.D., Thomashow M.F. A role for circadian evening elements in cold-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 60:328-339.
44. Cao S., et al. Involvement of GIGANTEA gene in the regulation of the cold stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 24:683-690.
45. Nakamichi N., et al. Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50:447-462.
46. Fukushima A., et al. Impact of clock-associated Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulators in metabolic coordination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:7251-7256.
47. Harmer S.L., Kay S.A. Positive and negative factors confer phase-specific circadian regulation of transcription in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17:1926-1940.
48. Alabadi D., et al. Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 2001, 293:880-883.
49. Gong W., et al. The development of protein microarrays and their applications in DNA-protein and protein-protein interaction analyses of Arabidopsis transcription factors. Mol. Plant 2008, 1:27-41.
50. Zhang X., et al. Constitutive expression of CIR1 (RVE2) affects several circadian-regulated processes and seed germination in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007, 51:512-525.
51. Kuno N., et al. The novel MYB protein EARLY-PHYTOCHROME-RESPONSIVE1 is a component of a slave circadian oscillator in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2476-2488.
52. Walley J.W., et al. Mechanical stress induces biotic and abiotic stress responses via a novel cis-element. PLOS Genet. 2007, 3:1800-1812.
53. Kurepa J., et al. Oxidative stress tolerance and longevity in Arabidopsis: the late-flowering mutant gigantea is tolerant to paraquat. Plant J. 1998, 14:759-764.
54. Cao S., et al. The role of GIGANTEA gene in mediating the oxidative stress response and in Arabidopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 48:261-270.
55. Kant P., et al. Functional-genomics-based identification of genes that regulate Arabidopsis responses to multiple abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:697-714.
56. Turck F., et al. Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59:573-594.
57. Kobayashi Y., Weigel D. Move on up, it's time for change - mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. Gene Dev. 2007, 21:2371-2384.
58. Suarez-Lopez P., et al. CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature 2001, 410:1116-1120.
59. Valverde F., et al. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein and the mechanism of photoperiodic flowering. Science 2004, 303:1003-1006.
60. Imaizumi T., et al. FKF1 is essential for photoperiodic-specific light signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 2003, 426:302-306.
61. Fornara F., et al. Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. Dev. Cell 2009, 17:75-86.
62. Sawa M., et al. FKF1 and GIGANTEA complex formation is required for day-length measurement in Arabidopsis. Science 2007, 318:261-265.
63. Nelson D.C., et al. FKF1, a clock-controlled gene that regulates the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell 2000, 101:331-340.
64. Park D.H., et al. Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the GIGANTEA gene. Science 1999, 285:1579-1582.
65. Fowler S., et al. GIGANTEA: A circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains. EMBO J. 1999, 18:4679-4688.
66. Imaizumi T., et al. FKF1F-BOX protein mediates cyclic degradation of a repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 309:293-297.
67. Jang S., et al. Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response. EMBO J. 2008, 27:1277-1288.
68. Laubinger S., et al. Arabidopsis SPA proteins regulate photoperiodic flowering and interact with the floral inducer CONSTANS to regulate its stability. Development 2006, 133:3213-3222.
69. Liu, L.-J. et al. (2008) COP1-mediated ubiquitination of CONSTANS is implicated in cryptochrome regulation of flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, tpc.107.057281.
70. Osterlund M.T., et al. Targeted destabilization of HY5 during light-regulated development of Arabidopsis. Nature 2000, 405:462-466.
71. Yang H.Q., et al. The signaling mechanism of Arabidopsis CRY1 involves direct interaction with COP1. Plant Cell 2001, 13:2573-2587.
72. Wang H.Y., et al. Direct interaction of Arabidopsis cryptochromes with COP1 in light control development. Science 2001, 294:154-158.
73. Yant L., et al. Just say no: floral repressors help Arabidopsis bide the time. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:580-586.
74. Castillejo C., Pelaz S. The balance between CONSTANS and TEMPRANILLO activities determines FT expression to trigger flowering. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1338-1343.
75. Salazar J.D., et al. Prediction of photoperiodic regulators from quantitative gene circuit models. Cell 2009, 139:1170-1179.
76. Green R.M., et al. Circadian rhythms confer a higher level of fitness to Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129:576-584.
77. Ni Z.F., et al. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature 2009, 457:327-1327.
78. Bohlenius H., et al. CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 2006, 312:1040-1043.
79. El-Assal S.E.D., et al. A QTL for flowering time in Arabidopsis reveals a novel allele of CRY2. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29:435-440.
80. Lempe J., et al. Diversity of flowering responses in wild Arabidopsis thaliana strains. PLOS Genet. 2005, 1:109-118.
81. Giakountis A., et al. distinct patterns of genetic variation alter flowering responses of Arabidopsis accessions to different daylengths. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152:177-191.
82. Balasubramanian S., et al. The PHYTOCHROME C photoreceptor gene mediates natural variation in flowering and growth responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:711-715.
83. Werner J.D., et al. Quantitative trait locus mapping and DNA array hybridization identify an FLM deletion as a cause for natural flowering-time variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:2460-2465.
84. Schwartz C., et al. Cis-regulatory changes at FLOWERING LOCUS T mediate natural variation in flowering responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2009, 183:723-732.
85. Darrah C., et al. Analysis of phase of LUCIFERASE expression reveals novel circadian quantitative trait loci in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140:1464-1474.
86. Panda S., et al. Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock. Cell 2002, 109:307-320.
87. Etchegaray J.P., et al. Rhythmic histone acetylation underlies transcription in the mammalian circadian clock. Nature 2003, 421:177-182.
88. Ripperger J.A., Schibler U. Rhythmic CLOCK-BMAL1 binding to multiple E-box motifs drives circadian Dbp transcription and chromatin transitions. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:369-374.
89. Perales M., Mas P. A functional link between rhythmic changes in chromatin structure and the Arabidopsis biological clock. Plant Cell 2007, 19:2111-2123.
90. Tessadori F., et al. Phytochrome B and histone deacetylase 6 control light-induced chromatin compaction in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000638.
91. Swarup K., et al. Natural allelic variation identifies new genes in the Arabidopsis circadian system. Plant J. 1999, 20:67-77.
92. Edwards K.D., et al. FLOWERING LOCUS C mediates natural variation in the high-temperature response of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 2006, 18:639-650.
93. Michael T.P., et al. Enhanced fitness conferred by naturally occurring variation in the circadian clock. Science 2003, 302:1049-1053.
94. Pruneda-Paz J.L., et al. A functional genomics approach reveals CHE as a component of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 2009, 323:1481-1485.
95. Nakamichi N., et al. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS 9, 7, and 5 are transcriptional repressors in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 2010, 22:594-605.
96. Baudry A., et al. F-Box Proteins FKF1 and LKP2 act in concert with ZEITLUPE to control Arabidopsis clock progression. Plant Cell 2010, 22:606-622.
97. Ding Z.J., et al. A complex genetic interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana TOC1 and CCA1/LHY in driving the circadian clock and in output regulation. Genetics 2007, 176:1501-1510.
98. Leivar P., et al. Definition of early transcriptional circuitry involved in light-induced reversal of PIF-imposed repression of photomorphogenesis in young Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 2009, 21:3535-3553.
99. Shin J., et al. Phytochromes promote seedling light responses by inhibiting four negatively-acting phytochrome-interacting factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:7660-7665.
100. Achard P., et al. DELLAs contribute to plant photomorphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:1163-1172.