A comparative study of data-intensive demand modeling techniques in relation to product design and development

Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2009, DETC2009

Volumn 5, Issue PART A, 2010, Pages 371-383

  Tucker, Conrad S ^a   Hoyle, Christopher ^b   Kim, Harrison M ^a   Chen, Wei ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

C4.5 decision tree classification; Data mining; Decision based design; Discrete choice analysis

Indexed keywords

C4.5 DECISION TREE CLASSIFICATION; CHOICE MODELING; CLASSIFICATION MODELS; CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; CUSTOMER CHOICE; DATA REPOSITORIES; DATA SETS; DECISION BASED DESIGN; DECISION TREE CLASSIFICATION; DEMAND MODELING; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ENGINEERING DESIGN; MODEL GENERATION; MODEL-BASED; PERFORMANCE METRICS; PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DATA MINING; DECISION TREES; ENGINEERING; PRODUCT DESIGN; SALES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 77953702874     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2009-87049     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Wets, G, et al., Identifying Decision Structures Underlying Activity Patterns: An Exploration of Data Mining Algorithms. Transportation Research Record, 2000. 1718: p. 1-9.
2. Xie, C., L. J., and E. Parkany, Work Travel Mode Choice Modeling with Data Mining Decision Trees and Neural Networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003. 1854.
3. Yamamoto, T., R. Kitamura, and J. Fujii, Drivers' Route Choice Behavior: Analysis by Data Mining Algorithms. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002. 1807: p. 59-66.
4. Yamamoto, Y., S. Kurauchi, and T. Morikawa. Comparison of non-compensatory models of driver's choice on dynamic park and ride. in Intelligent Transportation Systems, 9th World Congress Proceedings. 2002. Chicago, Illinois.
5. Mohammadian, A. and E.J. Miller, Nested Logit Models and Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Household Automobile Choices: Comparison of Performance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002. 1807: p. 92-100.
6. Tucker, C.S. and H.M. Kim, Optimal Product Portfolio Formulation by Merging Predictive Data Mining with Multilevel Optimization. Transactions of ASME: ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2008. 130.
7. Anderson, S.P., A. De Palma, and J. Thisse, Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. 1992: MIT Press. 423.
8. Wassenaar, H.J. and W. Chen, An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2003. 125(3): p. 490-497.
9. Wassenaar, H.J., et al., Enhancing Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decision-Based Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2005. 127(4): p. 514-523.
10. Kumar, D., et al., Incorporating Customer Preferences and Market Trends in Vehicle Packaging Design. International Journal of Production Design, 2007.
11. Berry, S., Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1994. 25(2): p. 242-262.
12. Chen, W., K. Lewis, and L. Schmidt. Decision-Based Design: An Emerging Design Perspective. in Engineering Valuation & Cost Analysis, Special Edition on "Decision-Based Design: Status and Promise". 2000.
13. Du, X. and W. Chen, Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design. Transactions of ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, 2004. 126(2): p. 225-233.
14. Kumar, D.K., H.M. Kim, and W. Chen, Multi-level Optimization for Enterprise Driven Decision-Based Product Design. Research in Engineering Design, 2004.
15. Wassenaar, H.J., et al., Demand Analysis For Decision-Based Design Of Automotive Engine, in 2003 SAE World Congress Session on Technology/Experience/ Practice Exchange from Industry. 2003.
16. Shiau, C.S.N. and J.J. Michalek, Should Designers Worry About Market Systems? . Journal of Mechanical Design, 2009. 131(1): p. 1-9.
17. Michalek, J.J., F.M. Feinberg, and P.Y. Papalambros, Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2005. 22(1): p. 42-62.
18. Marston, M., J.K. Allen, and F. Mistree, The decision support problem technique: Integrating descriptive and normative approaches in decision-based design. Journal of Engineering Valuation and Cost Analysis, 2000. 3(1): p. 107-129.
19. Lewis, K. and F. Mistree, Collaborative, Sequential and Isolated Decisions in Design. Transactions of ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, 1998. 120: p. 643-652.
20. Train, K.E., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2003: Cambridge University Press.
21. Dean, D.H., Evaluating potential brand associations through conjoint analysis and market simulation. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 2004. 13(7): p. 506-513.
22. Green, P., J. Carroll, and S. Goldberg, A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 1981. 43: p. 17-35.
23. Jolliffe, I.T., Principal Component Analysis. Vol. 2. 2002. 487.
24. Yeung, K.Y. and W.L. Ruzzo, An empirical study of Principal Component Analysis for clustering gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 2001. 17(9): p. 763-774.
25. Stewart, D.W., The application and misapplication of factor analysis in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981. 18(1): p. 51-62.
26. Harman, H.H., Modern Factor Analysis. 3 ed. 1976: University of Chicago Press.
27. Han, J. and M. Kamber, Data Mining Concepts and Techniques. 2 ed. Microsoft Research, ed. J. Gray. 2006: Morgan Kaufmann.
28. Fayyad, U., G Piatetsky-Shapiro, and P. Smyth, From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 1996.
29. Agard, B. and A. Kusiak, Data-mining-based methodology for the design of product families. International Journal of Production Research, 2004. 42(15): p. 2955-2969.
30. Kusiak, A., Data mining: manufacturing and service applications. International Journal of Production Research, 2006. 44(19): p. 4175-4191. (Pubitemid 44181144)
31. Tucker, C.S. and H.M. Kim, Product Family Decision Tree Concept Generation and Validation through Data Mining and Multi-level Optimization. 2007 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2007.
32. Moon, S.K., S.R.T. Kumara, and T.W. Simpson, Data Mining and Fuzzy Clustering to Support Product Family Design, in Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference. 2006.
33. Rish, I., An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence, 2001.
34. Yu, H., J. Yang, and J. Han. Classifying Large Data Sets Using SVMs with HierarchicalClusters. in Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 2003. Washington, D.C. .
35. Lim, T. and W. Loh, A Comparison of Prediction Accuracy, Complexity and Training Time of Thirty three Old and New Classification Algorithms. Machine Learning, 2000. 40: p. 203-229.
36. Whitehead, J.C., et al., Combining Revealed And Stated Preference Data To Estimate The Nnomarket Value Of Ecological Services: An Assessment Of The State Of The Science. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2008. 22(5): p. 872-908.
37. Louviere, J.J., D.A. Hensher, and J.D. Swait, Stated choice methods: analysis and application 2000, New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Hoyle, C. and W. Chen. Next Generation QFD: Decision-Based Product Attribute Function Deployment. in International Conference On Engineering Design, ICED '07. 2007. Cite Des Sciences Et De L'Industrie, Paris, France.
39. McFadden, D., Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior Frontiers in Econometrics. 1974, New York: Academic Press.
40. Kumar, D., Demand Modeling for Enterprise-Driven Product Design in Mechanical Engineering. 2007, NorthWestern University: Evanston.
41. Salzberg, S., Book Review: C4.5:by J. Ross Quinlan.Inc., 1993.Programs for Machine Learning Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, . Machine Learning, 1994. 16: p. 235-240.
42. Quinlan, J., Induction of Decision Trees. Machine Learning, 1986. 1(1): p. 81-106.
43. Quinlan, J.R., C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. 1993: Morgan Kaufmann.
44. Asuncion, A. and D.J. Newman. UCI Machine Learning Repository. 2007 [cited 2009; Available from: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html.
45. Rosario, G.E., et al. Mapping Nominal Values to Numbers for Effective Visualization. in Special issue of selected and extended InfoVis 03 paper. 2004.
46. Lam, W., K. Keung, and C.X. Ling, Learning good prototypes for classification using filtering and abstraction of instances. Pattern Recognition, 2001. 35: p. 1491-1506.
47. Wang, Y., A New Approach to Fitting Linear Models in High Dimensional Spaces, in Computer Science. 2000, University of Waikato: Waikato. p. 218.
48. Witten, I.H. and E. Frank, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (Second Edition). 2005: Morgan Kaufmann. 525.
49. Shen, J. and S. Gao, A Solution to Separation and Multicollinearity in Multiple Logistic Regression. Journal of Data Science, 2008. 6: p. 515-531.
50. Kotsiantis, S., Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques. Informatica Journal, 2007. 31: p. 249-268.