Next generation QFD: Decision-based product attribute function deployment

Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn DS 42, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Hoyle, Christopher ^a   Chen, Wei ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual design; Decision making; Decision based design; Product Attribute Function Deployment (PAFD); Quality Function Deployment (QFD); Sensor design; Target setting

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE PRESSURE; CUSTOMER NEED; DECISION BASED DESIGN; DECISION-THEORETIC; DESIGN CONCEPT; DESIGN DECISIONS; DESIGN TOOL; ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS; ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE; NEW DESIGN; PROCESS TOOLS; PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CYCLE; PRODUCT PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT PLANNING; QUANTITATIVE DECISION; QUANTITATIVE ENGINEERING; SENSOR DESIGNS; TARGET LEVELS; TARGET SETTING; TECHNICAL ATTRIBUTES; USER RATING;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84862599618     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Ullman, D.G. The Mechanical Design Process, 2002 (McGraw-Hill, Boston).
2. Lewis, K., Chen, W. and Schmidt, L., eds. Decision Making in Engineering Design. (ASME Press, New York, 2006).
3. Krishnan, V. and Ulrich, K.T. Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature. Management Science, 2001, 47(1), 1-21.
4. Terninko, J. Step-by-Step QFD: Customer-Driven Product Design, 1997 (St. Lucie Press, Nottingham).
5. Clausing, D. and Hauser, J. The House of Quality. Harvard Business Review, 1988, 66(3), 63-73.
6. Chan, L.K. and Wu, M.L. Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143(3), 463-497.
7. Aungst, S., Barton, R. and Wilson, D. The Virtual Integrated Design Method. Quality Engineering, 2003, 15(4), 565-579.
8. Brackin, P. and Colton, J. A Strategy for Extending the House of Quality to Obtain Preliminary Design Specifications. Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas NV, September 1999 (ASME, New York).
9. Locascio, A. and Thurston, D.L. Transforming the House of Quality to a Multiobjective Optimization Formulation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1998, 16(2), 136-146.
10. Hazelrigg, G.A. The Implications of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem on Approaches to Optimal Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1996, 118(2), 161-164.
11. Armacost, R.L., Componation, P.J., Mullens, M.A. and Swart, W.W. An AHP Framework for Prioritizing Customer Requirements in QFD: An Industrialized Housing Application. IIE Transactions, 1994, 26(4), 72-79.
12. Hazelrigg, G.A. Validation of Engineering Design Alternative Selection Methods. Engineering Optimization, 2003, 35(2), 103-120.
13. Olewnik, A.T. and Lewis, K. On Validating Engineering Design Decision Support Tools. Concurrent Engineering, 2005, 13(2), 111-122.
14. Prasad, B. A Concurrent Function Deployment Technique for a Workgroup-Based Engineering Design Process. Journal of Engineering Design, 2000, 11(2), 103-119.
15. Gershenson, J.K. and Stauffer, L.A. A Taxonomy for Design Requirements from Corporate Customers. Research in Engineering Design, 1999, 11(2), 103-115.
16. Hazelrigg, G.A. A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1998, 120(4), 653-658.
17. Wassenaar, H.J. and Chen, W. An Approach to Decision-Based Design with Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2003, 125(3), 490-497.
18. Hoyle, C., Kumar, D., Chen, W. Product Attribute Function Deployment (PAFD) for Decision-Based Conceptual Design. Proceedings of the 2006 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, September 2006.
19. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis, 1985 (MIT Press, Cambridge).
20. Hauptmann, P. Sensors: Principles and Applications, 1993 (Prentice Hall, Hertfordshire).