Nested logit models and artificial neural networks for predicting household automobile choices: Comparison of performance

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1807, 2002, Pages 92-100

  Mohammadian, Abolfazl ^a   Miller, Eric J ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILES; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FORECASTING; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; URBAN PLANNING;

HOUSEHOLD AUTOMOBILE CHOICES; NESTED LOGIT MODEL;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 0036959642     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1807-12     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adriaans, P., and D. Zantinge. Data Mining. Addison Wesley Longman, London, 1996.
2. Hensher, D. A., and T. T. Ton. A Comparison of the Predictive Potential of Artificial Neural Networks and Nested Logit Models for Commuter Mode Choice. Transportation Research E, Vol. 36, 2000, pp. 152-172.
3. Neelakanta, P. S., ed. Information-Theoretic Aspects of Neural Networks. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1999.
4. Principe, J. C., N. R. Euliano, and W. C. Lefebvre. Neural and Adaptive Systems: Fundamentals Through Simulations. Wiley, New York, 2000.
5. Picton, P. Neural Networks, 2nd ed. Grassroots Series, Palgrave, U.K., 2000.
6. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, Simulation and Modelling. University of Alabama, Birmingham, 1989.
7. Roorda, M. J., A. Mohammadian, and E. J. Miller. Toronto Area Car Ownership Study: A Retrospective Interview and Its Applications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1719, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 69-76.
8. Roorda, M. J. Toronto Area Car Ownership Study: A Longitudinal Survey and a Preliminary Analysis of Results. M.A.Sc. thesis. University of Toronto, 1998.
9. Canadian Association of Technical Accident Investigators and Reconstructionists. Canadian Vehicle Specifications Systems, Version 1999.2. http://www.catair.net/. Accessed Aug. 1, 2001.
10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources, National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory (1990-1998). Fuel Economy Guide Database Files, Ann Arbor, Mich. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/download.shtml. Accessed Aug. 1, 2001.
11. Canadian Red Book, Official Used Car Valuations. Canadian Red Book, Toronto, Canada, 1990-1998.
12. Canadian Older Car/Truck Red Book. Canadian Red Book, Toronto, Canada, 1990-1998.
13. Greene, H. W. LIMDEP, Version 7.0 User's Manual. Econometric Software, Bellport, N.Y., 1995.
14. Shalaby, A. S. Investigating the Role of Relative Level-of-Service Characteristics in Explaining Mode Split for the Work Trip. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 22, 1998, pp. 125-148.
15. Faghri, A., and J. Hua. Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network Applications in Transportation Engineering. In Transportation Research Record 1358, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 71-80.
16. Yang, H., R. Kitamura, P. P. Jovanis, K. M. Vaugh, and M. A. Abdel-Aty. Exploration of Route Choice Behaviour with Advanced Traveler Information Using Neural Network Concepts. Transportation, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1993, pp. 199-223.
17. Parks, R. W., D. S. Levine, and D. L. Long, eds. Fundamentals of Neural Network Modeling. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1998.
18. Lefebvre, C. Neuro Solutions, Version 4.10. NeuroDimension, Gainesville, Fla., 2001.