Nanomaterials for in situ cell delivery and tissue regeneration

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volumn 62, Issue 7-8, 2010, Pages 731-740

  Wan, Andrew C A ^a   Ying, Jackie Y ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Cell delivery; Definition; Microenvironment; Nanomaterials; Tissue engineering; Tissue regeneration

Indexed keywords

CELL DELIVERY; MICROENVIRONMENT; MICROENVIRONMENTS; NANO-MATERIALS; TISSUE REGENERATION;

CARBON NANOTUBES; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; PEPTIDES; SCAFFOLDS; TISSUE;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

AMPHOPHILE; ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTYLSERINE; CARBON NANOTUBE; NANOMATERIAL; SOMATOMEDIN C;

APOPTOSIS; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIOMIMETICS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL THERAPY; CROSS LINKING; ELECTROSPINNING; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HEART INFARCTION; HYDROGEL; MATERIAL COATING; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MESOTHELIOMA; NERVE REGENERATION; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ANIMALS; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; DNA; HUMANS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTUBES, CARBON; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 77953684413     PISSN: 0169409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.02.002     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Siegel R.W., Fougere G.E. Mechanical properties of nanophase metals. Nanostruct. Mater. 1995, 6:205-216.
2. Hartgerink J.D., Beniash E., Stupp S.I. Peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: a versatile scaffold for the preparation of self-assembling materials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99(8):5133-5138.
3. Nel A.E., Madler L., Velegol D., et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Maters 2009, 8:543-557.
4. Humphries M.J., Travis M.A., Clark K., et al. Mechanisms of integration of cells and extracellular matrices by integrins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2004, 32:822-825.
5. Iozzo R.V. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans: intricate molecules with intriguing functions. J. Clin. Invest. 2001, 108:165-167.
6. Zhang L., Webster T.J. Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: promises for improved tissue regeneration. Nano Today 2009, 4:66-80.
7. Dillow A.K., Ochsenhirt S.E., McCarthy J.B., et al. Adhesion of receptors to biomimetic substrates constructed from peptide amphiphiles. Biomaterials 2001, 22:1493-1505.
8. Tang A., Wang C., Stewart R., et al. Self-assembled peptides exposing epitopes recognizable by human lymphoma cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 2000, 11:363-371.
9. Mattson M.P., Haddon R.C., Rao A.M. Molecular functionalization of carbon nanotubes and use as substrates for neuronal growth. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2000, 14:175-182.
10. Matthews J.A., Wnek G.E., Simpson D.G., et al. Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers. Biomacromol 2002, 3:232-238.
11. Li W.J., Laurencin C.T., Caterson E.J., et al. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 60:613-621.
12. Chluba J., Voegel J.C., Decher G., et al. Peptide hormone covalently bound to polyelectrolytes and embedded into multilayer architectures conserving full biological activity. Biomacromol 2001, 2:800-805.
13. Hartgerink J.D., Beniash E., Stupp S.I. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science 2001, 294:1684-1688.
14. Toksöz S., Guler M.O. Self-assembled peptidic nanostructures. Nano Today 2009, 4:458-469.
15. Zhao X., Zhang S. Molecular designer self-assembling peptides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35:1105-1110.
16. Yang Y., Khoe U., Wang X., et al. Designer self-assembling peptide nanomaterials. Nano Today 2009, 4:193-210.
17. Tysseling-Mattiace V.M., Sahni V., Niece K.L., et al. Self-assembling nanofibers inhibit glial scar formation and promote axon elongation after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:3814-3823.
18. Harrington D.A., Cheng E.Y., Guler M.O., et al. Branched peptide-amphiphiles as self-assembling coatings for tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 78:157-167.
19. Sargeant T.D., Guler M.O., Oppenheimer S.M., et al. Hybrid bone implants: self-assembly of peptide amphiphile nanofibers within porous titanium. Biomaterials 2008, 29:161-171.
20. Webber M.J., Tongers J., Renault M.A., et al. Development of bioactive peptide amphiphiles for therapeutic cell delivery. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6:3-11.
21. Huang Z., Sargeant T.D., Hulvat J.F., et al. Bioactive nanofibers instruct cells to proliferate and differentiate during enamel regeneration. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23:1995-2006.
22. Stendahl J.C., Wang L.J., Chow L.W., et al. Growth factor delivery from self-assembling nanofibers to facilitate islet transplantation. Transplantation 2008, 86:478-481.
23. Zhang S., Holmes T.C., DiPersio C.M., et al. Self-complementary oligopeptide matrices support mammalian cell attachment. Biomaterials 1995, 16:1385-1393.
24. Horii A., Wang X., Gelain F., et al. Biological designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds significantly enhance osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and 3-D migration. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e190.
25. Gelain F., Bottai D., Vescovi A., et al. Designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds for adult mouse neural stem cell 3-dimensional cultures. PLoS ONE 2006, 1:e119.
26. Kisiday J., Jin M., Kurz B., et al. Self-assembling peptide hydrogel fosters chondrocyte extracellular matrix production and cell division: implications for cartilage tissue repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99:9996-10001.
27. Wang S., Nagrath D., Chen P.C., et al. Three-dimensional primary hepatocyte culture in synthetic self-assembling peptide hydrogel. Tissue Eng. Part A 2008, 14:227-236.
28. Semino C.E., Merok J.R., Crane G.G., et al. Functional differentiation of hepatocyte-like spheroid structures from putative liver progenitor cells in three-dimensional peptide scaffolds. Differentiation 2003, 71:262-270.
29. Navarro-Alvarez N., Soto-Gutierrez A., Rivas-Carrillo J.D., et al. Self-assembling peptide nanofiber as a novel culture system for isolated porcine hepatocytes. Cell Transplant. 2006, 15:921-927.
30. Davis M.E., Motion J.P., Narmoneva D.A., et al. Injectable self-assembling peptide nanofibers create intramyocardial microenvironments for endothelial cells. Circulation 2005, 111:442-450.
31. Davis M.E., Hsieh P.C., Takahashi T., et al. Local myocardial insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) delivery with biotinylated peptide nanofibers improves cell therapy for myocardial infarction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:8155-8160.
32. Padin-Iruegas M.E., Misao Y., Davis M.E., et al. Cardiac progenitor cells and biotinylated insulin-like growth factor-1 nanofibers improve endogenous and exogenous myocardial regeneration after infarction. Circulation 2009, 120:876-887.
33. Pek Y.S., Wan A.C.A., Shekaran A., et al. A thixotropic nanocomposite gel for three-dimensional cell culture. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3:671-675.
34. Smith L.A., Ma P.X. Nano-fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Colloids Surf., B Biointerfaces 2004, 39:125-131.
35. Liu X., Ma P.X. The nanofibrous architecture of poly(l-lactic acid)-based functional copolymers. Biomaterials 2010, 31:259-269.
36. Woo K.M., Chen V.J., Ma P.X. Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2003, 67A:531-537.
37. Hua J., Feng K., Liu X., Ma P.X. Chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiations of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on a nanofibrous scaffold with designed pore network. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5061-5067.
38. Murugan, Ramakrishna S. Nano-featured scaffolds for tissue engineering: a review of spinning methodologies. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12:435-447.
39. McManus M.C., Boland E.D., Koo H.P., et al. Mechanical properties of electrospun fibrinogen structures. Acta Biomater. 2006, 2:19-28.
40. Zoccola M., Aluigi A., Vineis C., et al. Study on cast membranes and electrospun nanofibers made from keratin/fibroin blends. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:2819-2825.
41. Hsu Y.M., Chen C.N., Chiu J.J., et al. The effects of fiber size on MG63 cells cultured with collagen based matrices. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009, 91B:737-745.
42. Thomas V., Zhang X., Vohra Y.K. A biomimetic tubular scaffold with spatially designed nanofibers of protein/PDS(R) bio-blends. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 104:1025-1033.
43. Lannutti J., Reneker D., Ma T., et al. Electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2007, 27:504-509.
44. Pham Q.P., Sharma U., Mikos A.G. Electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) microfiber and multilayer nanofiber/microfiber scaffolds: characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular infiltration. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:2796-2805.
45. Srouji S., Kizhner T., Suss-Tobi E., et al. 3-D nanofibrous electrospun multilayered construct is an alternative ECM mimicking scaffold. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2008, 19:1249-1255.
46. Leong M.F., Rasheed M.Z., Lim T.C., et al. In vitro cell infiltration and in vivo cell infiltration and vascularization in a fibrous, highly porous poly(d, l-lactide) scaffold fabricated by cryogenic electrospinning technique. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 91:231-240.
47. Stankus J.J., Guan J., Fujimoto K., et al. Microintegrating smooth muscle cells into a biodegradable, elastomeric fiber matrix. Biomaterials 2006, 27:735-744.
48. Miyamoto K., Atarashi M., Kadozono H., et al. Creation of cross-linked electrospun isotypic-elastin fibers controlled cell-differentiation with new cross-linker. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2009, 45:33-41.
49. Han D., Gouma P.I. Electrospun bioscaffolds that mimic the topology of extracellular matrix. Nanomedicine 2006, 2:37-41.
50. Tuzlakoglu K., Bolgen N., Salgado A.J., et al. Nano- and micro-fiber combined scaffolds: a new architecture for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2005, 16:1099-1104.
51. Ajayan P.M. Nanotubes from carbon. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99:1787-1800.
52. Harrison B.S., Atala A. Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007, 28:344-353.
53. Correa-Duarte M.A., Wagner N., Rojas-Chapana J., et al. Fabrication and biocompatibility of carbon nanotube-based 3D networks as scaffolds for cell seeding and growth. Nano Lett. 2004, 4:2233-2236.
54. Meng J., Song L., Kong H., et al. Using single-walled carbon nanotubes nonwoven films as scaffolds to enhance long-term cell proliferation in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 79:298-306.
55. Decher G. Fuzzy nanoassemblies: toward layered polymeric multicomposites. Science 1997, 277:1232-1237.
56. Lvov Y., Antipov A.A., Mamedov A., et al. Urease encapsulation in nanoorganized microshells. Nano Lett. 2001, 1:125-128.
57. Sukhorukov G.B., Donath E., Lichtenfeld H., et al. Layer-by-layer self assembly of polyelectrolytes on colloidal particles. Colloids Surf. A 1998, 137:253-266.
58. Veerabadran N.G., Goli P.L., Stewart-Clark S.S., et al. Nanoencapsulation of stem cells within polyelectrolyte multilayer shells. Macromol. Biosci. 2007, 7:877-882.
59. Teramura Y., Kaneda Y., Iwata H. Islet-encapsulation in ultra-thin layer-by-layer membranes of poly(vinyl alcohol) anchored to poly(ethylene glycol)-lipids in the cell membrane. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4818-4825.
60. Rajagopalan P., Shen C.J., Berthiaume F., et al. Polyelectrolyte nano-scaffolds for the design of layered cellular architectures. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12:1553-1563.
61. Tai B.C.U., Du C., Gao S., et al. The use of a polyelectrolyte fibrous scaffold to deliver differentiated hMSCs to the liver. Biomaterials 2010, 31:48-57.
62. Elcin Y.M., Elcin A.E., Pappas G.D. Functional and morphological characteristics of bovine adrenal chromaffin cells on macroporous poly(d, l-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 2003, 9:1047-1056.
63. Sarkar S., Dadhania M., Rourke P., et al. Vascular tissue engineering: microtextured scaffold templates to control organization of vascular smooth muscle cells and extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater. 2005, 1:93-100.
64. Santos M.I., Tuzlakoglu K., Fuchs S., et al. Endothelial cell colonization and angiogenic potential of combined nano- and micro-fibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008, 29:4306-4313.
65. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and rhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
66. Silva G.A., Czeisler C., Niece K.L., et al. Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density nanofibers. Science 2004, 303:1352-1355.
67. Holmes T.C., de Lacalle S., Su X., et al. Extensive neurite outgrowth and active synapse formation on self-assembling peptide scaffolds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:6728-6733.
68. Ellis-Behnke R.G., Liang Y.X., You S.W., et al. Nano neuro knitting: peptide nanofiber scaffold for brain repair and axon regeneration with functional return of vision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:5054-5059.
69. Sieminski A.L., Semino C.E., Gong H., et al. Primary sequence of ionic self-assembling peptide gels affects endothelial cell adhesion and capillary morphogenesis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2008, 87:494-504.
70. Genove E., Shen C., Zhang S., et al. The effect of functionalized self-assembling peptide scaffolds on human aortic endothelial cell function. Biomaterials 2005, 26:3341-3351.
71. Guler M.O., Hsu L., Soukasene S., et al. Presentation of RGDS epitopes on self-assembled nanofibers of branched peptide amphiphiles. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:1855-1863.
72. Rajangam K., Behanna H.A., Hui M.J., et al. Heparin binding nanostructures to promote growth of blood vessels. Nano Lett. 2006, 6:2086-2090.
73. Fine E., Zhang L., Fenniri H., et al. Enhanced endothelial cell functions on rosette nanotube-coated titanium vascular stents. Int. J. Nanomed. 2009, 4:91-97.
74. Zhang L., Rodriguez J., Raez J., et al. Biologically inspired rosette nanotubes and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite hydrogel nanocomposites as improved bone substitutes. Nanotechnology 2009, 20:175101.
75. Zhang L., Rakotondradany F., Myles A.J., et al. Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid modified rosette nanotube-hydrogel composites for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1309-1320.
76. Zhang X., Meng L., Lu Q. Cell behaviors on polysaccharide-wrapped single-wall carbon nanotubes: a quantitative study of the surface properties of biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds. ACS Nano 2009, 3:2003-2006.
77. Zhao B., Hu H., Mandal S.K., et al. A bone mimic based on the self-assembly of hydroxyapatite on chemically functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17:3235-3241.
78. Zanello L.P., Zhao B., Hu H., et al. Bone cell proliferation on carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2006, 6:562-567.
79. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
80. Pek Y.S., Wan A.C.A., Ying J.Y. Matrix stiffness directs human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in a 3D thixotropic gel. Biomaterials 2010, 31:385-391.
81. Cukierman E., Pankov R., Stevens D.R., et al. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294:1708-1712.
82. Reilly G.C., Engler A.J. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. J. Biomech. 2009, 43:55-62.
83. Nelson C.M., Jean R.P., Tan J.L., et al. Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:11594-11599.
84. Ruiz S.A., Chen C.S. Emergence of patterned stem cell differentiation within multicellular structures. Stem Cells 2008, 26:2921-2927.
85. O'Brien F.J., Harley B.A., Yannas I.V., Gibson L.J. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials 2005, 26:433-441.
86. Rowlands A.S., George P.A., Cooper-White J.J. Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2008, 295:C1037-C1044.
87. Chen A.A., Khetani S.R., Lee S., et al. Modulation of hepatocyte phenotype in vitro via chemomechanical tuning of polyelectrolyte multilayers. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1113-1120.
88. Moby V., Kadi A., de Isla N., et al. Polyelectrolyte multilayer films: effect of the initial anchoring layer on the cell growth. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 2008, 18:199-204.
89. Chun Y.W., Webster T.J. The role of nanomedicine in growing tissues. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37:2034-2047.
90. Martinez E., Engel E., Planell J.A., Samitier J. Effects of artificial micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. Ann. Anat. 2009, 191:126-135.
91. Berry C.C., Dalby M.J., Oreffo R.O.C., et al. The interaction of human bone marrow cells with nanotopographical features in three dimensional constructs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2006, 79A:431-439.
92. Yim E.K.F., Pang S.W., Leong K.W. Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313:1820-1829.
93. Christopherson G.T., Song H., Mao H.Q. The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. Biomaterials 2009, 30:556-564.
94. Pek Y.S., Gao S., Mohamed Arshad M.S., et al. Porous collagen-apatite nanocomposite foams as bone regeneration scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008, 29:4300-4305.
95. Thomas C.E., Ehrhardt A., Kay M.A. Progress and problems with the use of viral vectors for gene therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:346-358.
96. Park T.G., Jeong J.H., Kim S.W. Current status of polymeric gene delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58:467-486.
97. Dang J.M., Leong K.W. Natural polymers for gene delivery and tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58:487-499.
98. Singh R., Pantarotto D., McCarthy D., et al. Binding and condensation of plasmid DNA onto functionalized carbon nanotubes: toward the construction of nanotube-based gene delivery vectors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127:4388-4396.
99. Bonadio J. Tissue engineering via local gene delivery: update and future prospects for enhancing the technology. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2000, 44:185-194.
100. Scillinger U., Wexel G., Hacker C., et al. A fibrin glue composition as carrier for nucleic acid vectors. Pharm. Res. 2008, 25:2946-2962.
101. Quick D.J., Anseth K.S. Gene delivery in tissue engineering: a photopolymer platform to coencapsulate cells and plasmid DNA. Pharm. Res. 2003, 20:1730-1737.
102. de Laporte L., Yan A.L., Shea L.D. Local gene delivery from ECM-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) multiple channel bridges after spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2361-2368.
103. Fan H., Lu Y., Stump A., et al. Rapid prototyping of patterned functional nanostructures. Nature 2000, 405:56-60.
104. Lim S.H., Liao I.C., Leong K.W. Nonviral gene delivery from nonwoven fibrous scaffolds fabricated by interfacial complexation of polyelectrolytes. Mol. Ther. 2006, 13:1163-1172.
105. Shi X., Sitharaman B., Pham Q.P., et al. Fabrication of porous ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4078-4090.
106. MacDonald R.A., Laurenzi B.F., Viswanathan G., et al. Collagen-carbon nanotube composite materials as scaffolds in tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2005, 74:489-496.
107. Thompson B.C., Moulton S.E., Gilmore K.J., et al. Carbon nanotube biogels. Carbon 2009, 47:1282-1291.
108. Abarrategi A., Gutierrez M.C., Moreno-Vicente C., et al. Multiwall carbon nanotube scaffolds for tissue engineering purposes. Biomaterials 2008, 29:94-102.
109. Yu M., Files B.S., Arepalli S., et al. Tensile loading of ropes of singlewall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84:5552.
110. Wang S.F., Lu S., Zhang W.D., et al. Preparation and mechanical properties of chitosan/carbon nanotubes composites. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:3067-3072.
111. Koerner H., Price G., Pearce N.A., et al. Remotely actuated polymer nanocomposites - stress-recovery of carbon-nanotube-filled thermoplastic elastomers. Nat. Maters 2004, 3:115-120.
112. Lovat V., Pantaratto D., Lagostena L., et al. Carbon nanotube substrates boost neuronal electrical signaling. Nano Lett. 2005, 5:1107-1110.
113. Gabay T., Jakobs E., Ben-Jacob E., et al. Engineered self-organization of neural networks using carbon nanotube clusters. Physica A 2005, 350:611-621.
114. Supronowicz P.R., Ajayan P.M., Ullmann K.R., et al. Novel current-conducting composite substrates for exposing osteoblasts to alternating current stimulation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 59:499-506.
115. Galvan-Garcia P., Keefer E.W., Yang F., et al. Robust cell migration and neuronal growth on pristine carbon nanotube sheets and yarns. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2007, 18:1245-1261.
116. Hussain S.M., Braydich-Stolle L.K., Schrand A.M., et al. Toxicity evaluation for safe use of nanomaterials: recent achievements and technical challenges. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21:1549-1559.
117. Smith M.W., Gumbleton M. Endocytosis at the bloodbrain barrier: from basic understanding to drug delivery strategies. J. Drug Target. 2006, 14:191-214.
118. Chithrani B.D., Chan W.C.W. Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett. 2007, 7:1542-1550.
119. Zhang S., Li J., Lykotrafitis G., et al. Size-dependent endocytosis of nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21:419-424.
120. Linse S., Cabaleiro-Lago C., Xue W.F., et al. Nucleation of protein fibrillation by nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:8691-8696.
121. Beniash E., Hartgerink J.D., Storrie H., et al. Self-assembling peptide amphiphile nanofiber matrices for cell entrapment. Acta Biomater. 2005, 1:387-397.
122. Poland C.A., Duffin R., Kinloch I., et al. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3:423-428.
123. Shvedova A.A., Fabisiak J.P., Kisin E.R., et al. Sequential exposure to carbon nanotubes and bacteria enhances pulmonary inflammation and infectivity. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 38:579-590.
124. Witasp E., Shvedova A.A., Kagan V.E., et al. Single-walled carbon nanotubes impair human macrophage engulfment of apoptotic cell corpses. Inhal. Toxicol. 2009, 21:131-136.
125. Park E.J., Cho W.S., Jeong J., et al. Pro-inflammatory and potential allergic responses resulting from B cell activation in mice treated with multi-walled carbon nanotubes by intratracheal instillation. Toxicology 2009, 259:113-121.
126. Kaiser J.P., Krug H.F., Wick P. Nanomaterial cell interactions: how do carbon nanotubes affect cell physiology?. Nanomedicine 2009, 4:57-63.