Pursuit of a natural classification of diatoms: An incorrect comparison of published data

European Journal of Phycology

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 155-166

  Medlin, Linda K ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE ARAGO   (France)

Author keywords

Diatoms; rRNA phylogenies; Secondary structure alignments

Indexed keywords

DIATOM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; RELATEDNESS; TAXONOMY;

BACILLARIOPHYTA;

EID: 77953633560     PISSN: 09670262     EISSN: 14694433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09670260903511657     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. AGASSIZ, L. (1859). An Essay on Classification. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. ALVERSON, A.J., CANNONE, J.J., GUTELL, R.R. & THERIOT, E.C. (2006b). The evolution of elongate shape in diatoms. J. Phycol., 42: 655-668.
3. ALVERSON, A.J., KANG, S.H. & THERIOT, E.C. (2006a). Cell wall morphology and systematic importance of Thalassiosira ritscheri (Hustedt) Hale with a description of Shinodiscus gen. nov. Diatom Res., 21: 251-262.
4. ALVERSON, A.J. & THERIOT, E. (2005). Comments on recent progress toward reconstruicting diatom phylogeny. Nanosci. Nanotech., 5: 57-62.
5. ALVERSON, A.J. & THERIOT, E. (2007). Bridging the Rubicon: Phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonization of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Mol. Phylog. Evol., 45: 193-210.
6. BHATTACHARYA, D., MEDLIN, L., WAINWRIGHT, P.O., ARIZTIA, E.V., BIBEAU, C., STICKEL, S.K. & SOGIN, M.L. (1992). Algae containing chlorophylls a + c are paraphyletic: molecular evolutionary analysis of the Chromophyta. Evolution 46: 1808-1817; Errata. Evolution 47: 98.
7. BILLOUD, B., GUERRUCCI, M-A., MASSELOT, M. & DEUTTSCH, J. (2000). Cirripede phylogeny using a novel approach: molecular morphometrics. Mol. Biol. Evol., 17: 1435-1445.
8. BRUDER, K. & MEDLIN, L.K. (2008). Molecular assessment of phylogenetic relationships in selected species/genera in the naviculoid diatoms. III. Hippodonta and Navicula sensu stricto. Diatom Res, 23: 331-347.
9. CAETANO-ANNOLES, G. (2002). Tracing the evolution of RNA structure in ribosomes. N.A.R. 30: 2575-2587.
10. CAVALIER-SMITH, T. & CHAO, E.E.-Y. (2006). Phylogeny and megasystematics of phagotrophic heterokonts (Kingdom Chromista). J. Mol. Evol., 62: 388-420.
11. CHOI, H.G., JOO, H.M., JUNG, W., HONG, S.S., KANG, J.S. & KANG, S.H. (2008). Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of some psychrophilic polar diatoms (Bacillariophyta). Nova Hedwig., Beih., 133: 7-30.
12. COX, E.J. & REID, G.R. (2004). Generic relationships within the Naviculineae: a preliminary cladistic analysis. In Proceedings of the 17th International Diatom Symposium (Poulin, M. editor), 49-62, Biopress, Bristol, UK.
13. DOUADY, C.J., DELSUC, F., BOUCHER, Y, DOOLITTLE, W.F. & DOUZERY, E.J.O. (2003). Comparison of Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood bootstrap measure of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol., 20: 248-254.
14. DUTHEIL, J., PUPKO, T., JEAN-MARIE, A. & GALTIER, N. (2005). A model-based approach for detecting coevolving positions in a molecule. Mol. Biol. Evol., 22: 1919-1928.
15. EHARA, M., INAGAKI, Y., WATANABE, K.I. & OHAMA, T. (2000). Phylogenetic analysis of diatom coxI genes and implications of a fluctuating GC content on mitochondrial genetic code evolution. Cur. Gen., 37: 29-33.
16. FOX, M. & SÖRHANNUS, U. (2004). The usefulness of the Rpo mito-chondrial gene in assessing diatom evolution. J. Euk. Microbiol., 50: 471-475.
17. HALL, B.G. (2005). Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol., 22: 792-802.
18. HÄRLIN, M. (1998a). Tree-thinking and nemertean systematics, with a systematization of the Eureptantia. Hydrobiologia, 365: 33-46.
19. HÄRLIN, M. (1998b). Taxonomic names of phylogenetic trees. Zoologica Scripta, 27: 381-390.
20. HÄRLIN, M. (1999). The logical priority of the tree over characters and some of its consequences for taxonomy. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 68: 497-503.
21. HIGGS, P.G. (2000). RNA secondary structure: physical and computational aspects. Q. Rev. Biophys. 30(3).
22. HILLIS, D.M. & HUELSENBECK, J.P. (1992). Signal, noise and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analysis. J. Hered., 83: 189-195.
23. HILLIS, D.M., HUELSENBECK, J.P. & CUNNINGHAM, C.W. (1994). Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science, 264: 671-676.
24. HÖRANDL, E. (2006). Paraphyletic vs monophyletic taxaEvolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon, 55: 564-570.
25. KACZMARSKA, I., BEATON, M., BENOIT, A.C. & MEDLIN, L.K. (2005). Molecular phylogeny of selected members of the Order Thalassiosirales (Bacillariophyta) and evolution of the fultoportula. J. Phycol., 42: 121-138.
26. KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F., CHEPURNOV, V., MEDLIN, L.K., DE STEFANO, M., SABBE, K. & MANN, D.G. (2006). Evolution of the diatoms. In Plant Genome: Biodiversity and Evolutiion, Vol. 2B (Sharma, A.K. & Sharma, A., editors), 117-178. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH.
27. KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F., DE STEFANO, M., MANN, D.G., SALMA, N. & MEDLIN, L.K. (2003a). The phylogenetic position of Toxarium, a pennate-like lineage within centric diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). J. Phycol., 39: 185-197.
28. KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F., MANN, D.G. & MEDLIN, L.K. (2003b). The phylogeny of the Diatoms: A review. In Silica in Biological Systems (Müller, W., editor), 59-97. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam.
29. KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F. & MEDLIN, L.K. (1996). Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta): IV. A reconstruction of their age from small subunit rRNA coding regions and the fossil record. Mol. Phylog. Evol., 6: 391-407.
30. LINNAEUS, C. (1751). Philosophia Botanica. Stockholm.
31. LUNDHOLM, N. (2001). What is Pseudo-nitzschia and what is Fragilariopsis? Chapter VII. In A Study of Pseudo-nitzschia Based on Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny - With Implications for the Systematics of Bacillariaceae. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Copenhagen.
32. MANN, D.G. & EVANS, K.M. (2008). Molecular genetics and the neglected art of diatomics. In Unravelling the Algae, the Past, the Present, and Future (Lewis, J. & Brodie, J., editors), 231-265. Elsevier, London.
33. MEDLIN, L.K., GERSONDE, R., KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F. & WELLBROCK, U. (1996a). Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). II. Nuclear-encoded small-subunit rRNA sequence comparisons confirm a paraphyletic origin for the centric diatoms. Mol. Biol. Evol., 13: 67-75.
34. MEDLIN, L., JUNG, I., BAHULIKAR, R., MENDGEN, K., KROTH, P. & KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F. (2008a). Evolution of the Diatoms. VI. Assessment of the new genera in the araphids using molecular data. Nova Hedwig., Beih., 133: 81-100.
35. MEDLIN, L. K. & KACZMARSKA, I. (2004). Evolution of the diatoms: V. Morphological and cytological support for the major clades and a taxonomic revision. Phycologia, 43: 245-270.
36. MEDLIN, L.K., KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F., GERSONDE, R. & WELLBROCK, U. (1996b). Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). III. Molecular evidence for the origin of the Thalassiosirales. Nova Hedwig., 11: 221-234.
37. MEDLIN, L.K., KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F., POTTER, D., SAUNDERS, G.W. & ANDERSON, R.A. (1997). Phylogenetic relationships of the 'golden algae' (haptophytes, heterokonts, chry- sophytes) and their plastids. Pl. Sys. Evol. (Supplement) 11: 187-210.
38. MEDLIN, L.K., KOOISTRA, W.H.C.F. & SCHMID, A.M.M. (2000). A review of the evolution of the diatoms - a total approach using molecules, morphology and geology. In The Origin and Early Evolution of the Diatoms: Fossil, Molecular and Biogeographical Approaches (Witkowski, A. & Sieminska, J., editors), 13-35. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Science, Cracow, Poland.
39. MEDLIN, L.K., SATO, S., MANN, D.G. & KOOISTRA, W.C.H.F. (2008b). Molecular evidence confirms sister relationship of Ardissonea, Climacosphenia and Toxarium within the bipolar centric diatoms (Mediophyceae, Bacillariophyta). J. Phycol., 44: 1340-1348.
40. MEDLIN, L.K., WILLIAMS, D.M. & SIMS, P.A. (1993). The evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). I. Origin of the group and assessment of the monophyly of its major divisions. Eur. J. Phycol., 28: 261-275.
41. NOSIL, P. (2007). Divergent host plant adaptation and reproductive isolation between ecotypes of Timenema cristinae walking sticks. Am. Nat., 169: 151-162.
42. NÜBEL, U., GARCIA-PPICHEL, F., CLAVERO, E. & MUYZER, G. (2000). Matching molecular diversity and ecophysiology of benthic cyanobacteria and diatom in communities along a salinity gradient. Env. Microbiol., 2: 217-226.
43. O'HARA, RJ. (1992). Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biology and Philosophy, 7: 135-160.
44. SATO, S. (2008). Phylogeny of araphid diatoms, inferred from morphological and molecular data. PhD dissertation, University of Bremen.
45. SAVILL, N.J., HOYLE, D.C. & HIGGS, P.G. (2001). RNA sequence evolution with secondary structure constraints: comparison of substitution rate models using Maximum-Likelihood methods. Genetics, 157: 399-411.
46. SCHÖNIGER, M. & VON HAESELER, A. (1995). Performance of the Maximum Likelihood, Neighbor Joining, and Maximum Parsimony analyses when sequence sites are not independent. Syst. Biol., 44: 533-547.
47. SIMS, P.A., MANN, D.G. & MEDLIN, L.K. (2006). Evolution of the diatoms: Insights from fossil, biological and molecular data. Phycologia, 45: 361-402.
48. SINNINGHE-DAMSTÉ, J.S., MUYZER, G., ABBAS, B., RAMPEN, S.W., MASSE, G., ALLARD, W.G., BELT, S.T., ROBERT, J.-M., ROWLAND, S.J., MOLDOWAN, J.M., et al. (2004). The rise of the rhizosolenoid diatoms. Science, 304: 584-587.
49. SMITH, A.D., LUI, T.W.H. & TILLIER, E.R.M. (2004). Empirical models for substitution in ribosomal RNA. Mol. Biol. Evol., 21: 419-427.
50. SÖRHANNUS, U. (2004). Diatom phylogenetics inferred based on direct optimization of nuclear-encoded SSU rRNA sequences. Cladistics, 20: 487-497.
51. SÖRHANNUS, U. (2007). A nuclear-encoded small-subunit ribosomal RNA timescale for diatom evolution. Mar. Micropaleont., 65: 1-12.
52. SOSEF, M.S.M. (1997). Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon, 46: 75-85.
53. SUYAMA, M., TORRENTS, D. & PEER BORK, P. (2006). PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corre- sponding codon alignments. NAR., 34: 609-612.
54. TANTENO, Y., TAKEZAKI, N. & NEI, M. (1994). Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining and maximum-par- simony method when substitution rate varies with site. Mol. Biol. Evol., 11: 261-277.
55. TELFORD, M.J., WISE, M.J. & GOWRI-SHANKAR, V. (2005). Consideration of RNA secondary structure significantly improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the Bilateria. Mol. Biol. Evol., 22: 1129-1136.
56. VAN DE PEER, Y., VAN DER AUWERA, G & DE WACHTER, R. (1996). The evolution of stramenopiles and alveolates as derived by substitution rate calibration of small ribosomal subunit RNA. J. Mol. Evol., 42: 201-210.
57. VERBRUGGEN, H. & THERIOT, E.C. (2008). Building trees of algae: some advances in phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis. Eur. J. Phycol., 43: 229-252.
58. VON STOSCH, H.A. (1950). Oogamy in a centric diatom. Nature, 165: 531-532.
59. WILLIAMS, D.M. & KOCIOLEK, J.P. (2007). The rejection of paraphyletic taxa. Eur. J. Phycol., 42: 313-319.