Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms

Bilingualism

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 119-135

  Feldman, Laurie Beth ^a   Kosti, Aleksandar ^b   Basnight Brown, Dana M ^a   Urevi, Duica Filipovi ^b   Pastizzo, Matthew John ^c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953609418     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909990459     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alegre, M. & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
2. Allen, A.&Badecker,W. (2002). Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 705-722.
3. Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B. & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 496-512.
4. Baayen, R. H. & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2005). Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81, 1-27.
5. Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H. & Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon, 2 (3), 419-463.
6. Basnight-Brown, D., Chen, H., Shu, H., Kostíc, A. & Feldman, L. B. (2007). Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Does sensitivity to word form vary with language experience? Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 65-80.
7. Bradlow, A. R. & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to nonnative speech. Cognition, 106, 707-729.
8. Bueno, S. & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2002). Rapid activation of the lexicon: A further investigation with behavioral and computational results. Brain and Language, 81, 120-130.
9. Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3-42.
10. Clahsen, H., Sonnenstuhl, I.&Blevins, J. P. (2003). Derivational morphology in the German mental lexicon: A dualmechanism account. In: H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds.), Morphological structure in language processing, pp. 125- 155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Davis, C. J. & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668-687.
12. Davis, M. H., Meunier, F. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Neural responses to morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of single words: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 89, 439-449.
13. Duyck, W. & De Houwer, J. (2008). Semantic access in second-language visual word processing: Evidence from the semantic Simon paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15 (5), 961-966.
14. Duyck, W., Vanderelst, D., Desmet, T. & Hartsuiker, R. T. (2008). The frequency effect in second-language visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 850-855.
15. Feldman, L. B. & Basnight-Brown, D. M.,(2008). List context fosters semantic processing: Parallels between semantic and morphological facilitation when primes are forward masked. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 34, 680-687.
16. Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A. & Martín, F. M. del P. (2009). Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: An exception to formthen-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 16, 684-691.
17. Feldman, L. B., Rueckl, J., Pastizzo, M., Diliberto, K. & Vellutino, F. (2002). Morphological analysis in beginning readers as revealed by the fragment completion task. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 77, 529-535.
18. Feldman, L. B.&Soltano, E. G. (1999).Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33-39.
19. Finkbeiner, M., Forster, K., Nicol, J. & Nakamura, K. (2004). The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 1-22.
20. Forster, K. I. (1999). The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language, 68, 5-15.
21. Forster, K. I. & Azuma, T. (2000). Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 539-561.
22. Forster, K. I. & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10 (4), 680-698.
23. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C. & Carter, R. (1987).Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
24. Francis, W. N. & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin.
25. Frost, R., Forster, K. I. & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A maskedpriming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23 (4), 829-856.
26. Gonnerman, L. M. (1999). Morphology and the lexicon: Exploring the semantic-phonology interface. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
27. Gonnerman, L.M., Seidenberg,M. S. & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 323-345.
28. Grainger, J., Coĺe, P. & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.
29. Healy, A. F., Barshi, I., Crutcher, R. J., Tao, L., Rickard, T. C., Marmie, W. R., Schneider, V. I., Feldman, A., Buck-Gengler, C. J., Romero, S.G., Sherrod,N. B., Parker, J. T.& Bourne, L. B. (1998). Toward the improvement of training in foreign languages. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (eds.), Foreign language learning, 3-53. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Holm, A. & Dodd, B. (1996). The effect of first written language on the acquisition of English literacy. Cognition, 59, 119-147.
31. Jiang, N. (1999). Testing processing explanations for the asymmetry in masked cross-language priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 59-75.
32. Jiang, N. & Forster, K. I. (2001). Cross-language priming asymmetries in lexical decision and episodic recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 32-51.
33. Johnson, E. S.&Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60-99.
34. Kielar,A., Joanisse,M. F.&Hare, M. L. (2007). Priming English past tense verbs: Rules or statistics? Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 327-346.
35. Kotz, S. A. & Elston-Guttler, K. (2004).) The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 215-235.
36. Kroll, J. F. & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.
37. Kucera, H. & Francis, N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
38. Lehtonen, M. & Laine, M. (2003). How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6 (3), 213-225.
39. Lehtonen, M., Niska, H., Wande, E., Niemi, J. & Laine, M. (2006). Recognition of inflected words in morphologically limited language: Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 121-146.
40. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R. & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101 (1), 3-33. (Pubitemid 24976784)
41. Masson, M. E. J. & Isaak, M. I. (1999). Masked priming of words and nonwords in a naming task: Further evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Memory and Cognition, 27, 399-412.
42. Meunier, F. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 561-580.
43. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L. & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. www.usf.edu/Free Association/.
44. Parodi, T., Schwartz, B. D. & Clahsen, H. (2004). On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals. Linguistics, 42, 669-705.
45. Pastizzo, M. J. & Feldman, L. B. (2002a). Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 244-249.
46. Pastizzo, M. J. & Feldman, L. B. (2002b). Does prime modality influence morphological processing? Brain and Language, 81, 28-41.
47. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of Language. Science, 253, 530-535.
48. Pinker, S. & Ullman, M. (2002a). Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue: Reply to McClelland and Patterson. Trends in the Cognitive Sciences, 6 (11), 472-474.
49. Pinker, S. & Ullman,M. (2002b). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in the Cognitive Sciences, 6 (11), 456-462.
50. Portin, M., Lehtonen, M. & Laine, M. (2007). Processing of inflected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 135-156.
51. Ramscar,M. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognition, 45, 45-94.
52. Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S. & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, connectionist networks, and masked fragment completion. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405.
53. Rueckl, J. G. & Raveh, M. (1999). The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language, 68, 110-117.
54. Śanchez-Casas, R. M., Davis, C. W. & García-Albea, J. E. (1992). Bilingual lexical processing: Exploring the cognate/noncognate distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 293-310.
55. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
56. Seidenberg, M. S. & Elman, L. M. (1999). Networks are not hidden rules. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 353-365.
57. Seidenberg, M. S. & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 288-289.
58. Silva, R. & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245-260.
59. Silverberg, S. & Samuel, A. G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 381-398.
60. Snodgrass, J. G. & Vanderwart, M. (1980). Norms for picture stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
61. Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S. & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203-236.
62. Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P. & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399-412.
63. Stemberger, J. P. & MacWhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition, 14, 17-26.
64. Stolz, J. A. & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing, pp. 109- 129. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Sunderman, G. & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First language activation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 387-422.
66. Talamas, A., Kroll, J. F. & Dufour, R. (1999). Form related errors in second language learning: A preliminary stage in the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2 (1), 45-58.
67. Tsapkini, K., Jarema, G. & Kehayia, E. (2004). Regularity revisited: Modality matters. Brain and Language, 89, 611-616.
68. Tsapkini, K., Kehayia, E. & Jarema, G. (1999). Does phonological change play a role in the recognition of derived forms across modalities? Brain and Language, 68, 318-323.
69. Ullman, M. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4 (2), 105-122.
70. Van Hell, J. G. (1998). Cross-language processing and bilingual memory organization. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.