Does phonological change play a role in the recognition of derived forms across modalities?

Brain and Language

Volumn 68, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 318-323

  Tsapkini, Kyrana ^a   Kehayia, Eva ^b,c   Jarema, Gonia ^a,d  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c JEWISH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LINGUISTICS; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHONEME; PHONETICS; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0033563773     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1999.2113     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Fowler C. A., Napps S. E., Feldman L. Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition. 13:1985;241-255.
2. Kiparsky P. Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistic Society of Korea. Linguistics in the Morning Calm. 1982;Hanshin, Seoul.
3. Kucera H., Francis W. N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. 1967;Brown University Press, Providence.
4. Marslen-Wilson W., Komisarjevsky-Tyler L., Walker R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33.
5. Marslen-Wilson W., Zhou X., Ford M. Morphology, modality and lexical architecture. Booij G., van Marle J. Yearbook of Morphology 1996. 1997;Amsterdam, Kluwer Academic.
6. Napps S. E. Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory and Cognition. 17:1989;729-739.
7. Stanners R. F., Neiser J. J., Painton S. Memory representation for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 18:1979;733-743.