Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 470-478

  Carrabba, Nazario ^a   Schuijf, Joanne D ^b   De Graaf, Fleur R ^b   Parodi, Guido ^a   Maffei, Erica ^c   Valenti, Renato ^a   Palumbo, Alessandro ^c   Weustink, Annick C ^d   Mollet, Nico R ^d   Accetta, Gabriele ^e   Cademartiri, Filippo ^c,d   Antoniucci, David ^a   Bax, Jeroen J ^b  

^a CAREGGI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Academic Hospital   (Italy)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e ISPO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computed tomography coronary angiography; In stent restenosis; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; HUMANS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77953322645     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9218-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. DL Fischman MB Leon DS Baim, et al. 1994 A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators N Engl J Med 331 496 501 10.1056/NEJM199408253310802 1:STN:280:DyaK2czhs1amsg%3D%3D 8041414 (Pubitemid 24256752)
2. PW Serruys P de Jaegere F Kiemeneij, et al. 1994 A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group N Engl J Med 331 489 495 10.1056/NEJM199408253310801 1:STN:280:DyaK2czhs1anuw%3D%3D 8041413 (Pubitemid 24256751)
3. GW Stone SG Ellis DA Cox, et al. 2004 A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease N Engl J Med 350 221 231 10.1056/NEJMoa032441 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXkvVKmtQ%3D%3D 14724301 (Pubitemid 38067635)
4. MC Morice PW Serruys JE Sousa, et al. 2002 A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization N Engl J Med 346 1773 1780 10.1056/NEJMoa012843 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xkt1Olsbw%3D 12050336 (Pubitemid 34586912)
5. MJ Zellweger M Weinbacher AW Zutter, et al. 2003 Long-term outcome of patients with silent versus symptomatic ischemia six months after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting J Am Coll Cardiol 42 33 40 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00557-6 12849656 (Pubitemid 36763591)
6. K Nieman F Cademartiri PA Lemos, et al. 2002 Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography Circulation 106 2051 2054 10.1161/01.CIR.0000037222.58317.3D 12379572 (Pubitemid 35192809)
7. JD Schuijf JJ Bax JW Jukema, et al. 2004 Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography Am J Cardiol 94 427 430 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.057 15325923 (Pubitemid 39119990)
8. P Whiting R Harbord J Kleijnen 2005 No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies BMC Med Res Methodol 5 19 10.1186/1471-2288-5-19 15918898 (Pubitemid 41185362)
9. JJ Deeks 2001 Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests BMJ 323 157 162 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvhsVSlsQ%3D%3D 11463691
10. WL Deville F Buntinx LM Bouter, et al. 2002 Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines BMC Med Res Methodol 2 9 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9 12097142
11. R DerSimonian N Laird 1986 Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 177 188 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7gsVamtA%3D%3D 3802833 (Pubitemid 17189972)
12. LE Moses D Shapiro B Littenberg 1993 Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: Data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations Stat Med 12 1293 1316 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FitlGkug%3D%3D 8210827
13. RM Harbord JJ Deeks M Egger, et al. 2007 A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies Biostatistics 8 239 251 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl004 16698768 (Pubitemid 46569586)
14. F Pugliese AC Weustink C van Mieghem, et al. 2008 Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis Heart 94 848 854 10.1136/hrt.2007.126474 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czot1Giuw%3D%3D 17881474 (Pubitemid 351914692)
15. C Rist F von Ziegler K Nikolaou, et al. 2006 Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography Acad Radiol 13 1465 1473 10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.044 17138114 (Pubitemid 44810002)
16. T Gaspar DA Halon BS Lewis, et al. 2005 Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 46 1573 1579 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.049 16226187 (Pubitemid 41446198)
17. CA van Mieghem F Cademartiri NR Mollet, et al. 2006 Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: A comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound Circulation 114 645 653 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105. 608950 16894038 (Pubitemid 44252306)
18. F Cademartiri JD Schuijf F Pugliese, et al. 2007 Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 49 2204 2210 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.045 17543641 (Pubitemid 46824113)
19. N Carrabba M Bamoshmoosh LM Carusi, et al. 2007 Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis Am J Cardiol 100 1754 1758 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.038 18082521 (Pubitemid 350234794)
20. M Ehara M Kawai JF Surmely, et al. 2007 Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: Comparison with invasive coronary angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 49 951 959 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.065 17336718
21. N Manghat R Van Lingen P Hewson, et al. 2008 Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis Am J Cardiol 101 1567 1573 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.042 18489934
22. D Oncel G Oncel M Karaca 2007 Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: Determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience Radiology 242 403 409 10.1148/radiol.2422060065 17255411 (Pubitemid 46146193)
23. J Rixe S Achenbach D Ropers, et al. 2006 Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography Eur Heart J 27 2567 2572 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl303 17035252 (Pubitemid 44627301)
24. M Hamon L Champ-Rigot R Morello, et al. 2008 Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: A meta-analysis Eur Radiol 18 217 225 10.1007/s00330-007-0743-6 17763854 (Pubitemid 351234041)
25. AH Mahnken G Muhlenbruch T Seyfarth, et al. 2006 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: A phantom study Acta Radiol 47 36 42 10.1080/02841850500406779 1:STN:280:DC%2BD287ht1Wjsg%3D%3D 16498931 (Pubitemid 43177528)
26. Z Sun AM Almutairi 2010 Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis Eur J Radiol 73 266 273 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.025 19056191
27. AH Mahnken A Buecker JE Wildberger, et al. 2004 Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: In vitro artifact evaluation Invest Radiol 39 27 33 10.1097/01.rli.0000095471.91575.18 14701986 (Pubitemid 38030174)
28. K Nieman BJ Rensing RJ van Geuns, et al. 2002 Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: Impact of heart rate Heart 88 470 474 10.1136/heart.88.5.470 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nisVWntg%3D%3D 12381635 (Pubitemid 35221956)
29. J Hausleiter T Meyer M Hadamitzky, et al. 2006 Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: Impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates Circulation 113 1305 1310 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602490 16520411 (Pubitemid 43739452)
30. P Stolzmann S Leschka H Scheffel, et al. 2008 Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: Noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose Radiology 249 71 80 10.1148/radiol.2483072032 18796669
31. AH Mahnken T Seyfarth T Flohr, et al. 2005 Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: Phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography Invest Radiol 40 8 13 15597014
32. JK Min RV Swaminathan M Vass, et al. 2009 High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: Comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3 246 251 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.06.006 19577213
33. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of 320-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography to Non-Invasively Assess In-Stent Restenosis. Invest Radiol 2010, in press.