Usefulness of 64-Detector Row Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Intracoronary Stents in Symptomatic Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis

American Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 101, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1567-1573

  Manghat, Nathan ^a   Van Lingen, Robin ^a   Hewson, Paul ^b   Syed, Farhan ^a   Kakani, Nirmal ^a   Cox, Ian ^a   Roobottom, Carl ^a   Morgan Hughes, Gareth ^a  

^a DERRIFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENT; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESTENOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 43549100418     PISSN: 00029149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.042     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Austen W., Edwards J., Frye R., Gensini G.G., Gott V.L., Griffith L.S., McGoon D.C., Murphy M.L., and Roe B.B. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Circulation 51 (1975) 5-40
2. Wilson E.B. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22 (1927) 209-212
3. Agresti A., and Coull B.A. Approximate is better than 'exact' for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Statistician 52 (1998) 119-126
4. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2006), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org Available at: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed: April 5, 2007
5. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
6. Falissard B. Psy: Various processes used in psychometry. www.r-project.org Accessed April 5, 2007
7. rd Ed. (1994), McGraw-Hill, New York
8. Nieman K., Cademartiri F., Raaijmakers R., Pattynama P., and de Feyter P. Noninvasive angiographic evaluation of coronary stents with multi-slice spiral computed tomography. Herz 28 (2003) 136-142
9. Mahnken A.H., Muhlenbruch G., Seyfarth T., Flohr T., Stanzel S., Wildberger J.E., Gunther R.W., and Kuettner A. 64-Slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study. Acta Radiol 47 (2006) 36-42
10. Rist C., Nikolaou K., Flohr T., Wintersperger B.J., Reiser M.F., and Becker C.R. High-resolution ex vivo imaging of coronary artery stents using 64-slice computed tomography-initial experience. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 1564-1569
11. Schuif J.D., Bax J.J., Jukema J.W., Lamb H.J., Warda H.M., Vliegen H.W., de Roos A., and van der Wall E.E. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 94 (2004) 427-430
12. Kruger S., Mahnken A.H., Sinha A.M., Borghans A., Dedden K., Hoffmann R., and Hanrath P. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 89 (2003) 167-172
13. Gilard M., Cornily J.C., Pennec P.Y., Le Gal G., Nonent M., Mansourati J., Blanc J.J., and Boschat J. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16-slice computed tomography. Heart 92 (2006) 58-61
14. Kitagawa T., Fujii T., Tomohiro Y., Maeda K., Kobayashi M., Kunita E., and Sekiguchi Y. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 109 (2006) 188-194
15. Beohar N., Robbins J.D., Cavanaugh B.J., Ansari A.H., Yaghmai V., Carr J., and Davidson C.J. Quantitative assessment of in-stent dimensions: a comparison of 64 and 16 detector multislice computed tomography to intravascular ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68 (2006) 8-10
16. Oncel D., Oncel G., and Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience. Radiology 242 (2007) 403-409
17. Rist C., von Ziegler F., Nikolaou K., Kirchin M.A., Wintersperger B.J., Johnson T.R., Knez A., Leber A.W., Reiser M.F., and Becker C.R. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Acad Radiol 13 (2006) 1465-1473
18. Ehara M., Kawai M., Surmely J.F., Matsubara T., Terashima M., Tsuchikane E., Kinoshita Y., Ito T., Takeda Y., Nasu K., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 951-959
19. Van Mieghem C.A.G., Cademartiri F., Mollet N.R., Mollet N.R., Malagutti P., Valgimigli M., Meijboom W.B., Pugliese F., McFadden E.P., Ligthart J., et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting. Circulation 114 (2006) 645-653
20. Hsieh J., Londt J., Vass M., Li J., Tang X., and Okerlund D. Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 33 (2006) 4236-4248