Putting standards into practice: Evaluating the utility of the nagc pre-k-grade 12 gifted program standards

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 159-167

  Matthews, Michael S ^a   Shaunessy, Elizabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Identification; NAGC Pre K Grade 12 Gifted Program Standards; Professional development; Special populations underserved gifted

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953274899     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: 19349041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986209356708     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anfara, V.A., Brown, K.M., & Mangione, T.L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31, 28-38.
2. Baker, B.B., & Friedman-Nimz, R. (2004). State policies and equal opportunity: The example of gifted education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 39-64.
3. Briggs, C.J., Reis, S.M., & Sullivan, E.E. (2008). A national view of promising programs and practices for culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 131-145.
4. Brown, E.F., Avery, L.D., VanTassel-Baska, J., Worley, B.B., II, & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Legislation and policies: Effects on the gifted. Roeper Review, 29, 11-23.
5. Callahan, C. (2005). Identifying gifted learners from underrepresented populations. Theory Into Practice, 44, 98-104.
6. Callahan, C.M., & McIntire, J. (1994). Identifying outstanding talent in American Indians and Alaska Native students. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
7. Coleman, L.J. (2006). A report card on the state of research on the talented and gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 346-350.
8. Delcourt, M.A.B. (2003). Five ingredients for success: Two case studies of advocacy at the state level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 26-37.
9. Florida Department of Education. (1998). Assessing Limited English Proficient (LEP) students for eligibility for gifted programs (Technical Assistance Paper No. FY 1999-6). Tallahassee, FL: Author.
10. Flynn, J.R. (2000). The hidden history of IQ and special education: Can the problems be solved? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 191-198.
11. Ford, D.Y., & Harris, J.J., III (1999). Multicultural gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Gallagher, J. J. (Ed.) (2004). Public policy in gifted education. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
13. Gallagher, J.J. (2006). How to shoot oneself in the foot with program evaluation. Roeper Review, 28, 122-124.
14. Gallagher, J.J. (2007). We are masters of our test, or are we? Roeper Review, 29, 159.
15. Grantham, T. (2003). Increasing Black student enrollment in gifted programs: An exploration of the Pulaski County Special School District's advocacy efforts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 46-65.
16. Hansford, S.J., Bonar, A.M., Scally, J.M., & Burge, N.A. (2001). Student identification. In M. Landrum, C. Callahan, & B. Shaklee (Eds.), Aiming for excellence: Annotations to the NAGC Pre-K- Grade 12 gifted program standards (pp. 39-52). Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.
17. Hays, T.S. (1993). An historical content analysis of publications in gifted education journals. Roeper Review, 16, 41-43.
18. Johnsen, S., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Robinson, A. (2008). Using the national gifted education standards for university teacher preparation programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19. Kitano, M., Montgomery, D., VanTassel-Baska, J.L., & Johnsen, S.K. (2008). Using the national gifted education standards for PreK-12 professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
20. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21. Landrum, M., Callahan, C., & Shaklee, B. (Eds.). (2001). Aiming for excellence: Annotations to the NAGC Pre-K-Grade 12 gifted program standards. Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.
22. Lohman, D.F. (2005). Review of Naglieri and Ford (2003): Does the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test identify equal proportions of high-scoring White, Black, and Hispanic students? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 19-28.
23. Lusi, S.F. (1997). The role of state departments of education in complex school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Matthews, M.S., Gentry, M., McCoach, D.B., Worrell, F.C., Matthews, D., & Dixon, F. (2008). Evaluating the state of a field: Effect size reporting in gifted education. Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 55-68.
25. National Association for Gifted Children. (2008/2000). Pre-K- Grade 12 Standards Introduction. Retrieved July 30, 2008, from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=546.
26. Parker, J. (1996). NAGC standards for personnel preparation in gifted education: A brief history. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 158-161.
27. Robinson, A., & Moon, S.M. (2003). A national study of local and state advocacy in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 8-25.
28. Special Instructional Programs for Students Who Are Gifted. (2002). Florida Administrative Code Section 6A-6.03019. Retrieved March 31, 2009 from https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleno.asp?id=6A-6.03019&Section=0.
29. VanTassel-Baska, J. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 199-215.
30. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Feng, A. X. (Eds.). (2004). Designing and utilizing evaluation for gifted program improvement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
31. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S.K. (2007). Teacher education standards for the field of gifted education: A vision of coherence for personnel preparation in the 21st century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 182-205.
32. Ziegler, A., & Raul, T. (2000). Myth and reality: A review of empirical studies on giftedness. High Ability Studies, 11, 113-135.