Computer-aided diagnosis with temporal analysis to improve radiologists interpretation of mammographic mass lesions

IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 803-808

  Timp, Sheila ^a   Varela, Celia ^a   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided diagnosis (CAD); Double reading; Mass characterization

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE ROC CURVE; BREAST CANCER; CAD TECHNOLOGIES; CASE ANALYSIS; DOUBLE READING; MALIGNANT MASS; MAMMOGRAPHIC MASS; MASS LESION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; X RAY SCREENS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TIME;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77953146140     PISSN: 10897771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2010.2043296     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. R. Bird, T. Wallace, and B. Yankaskas, "Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography," Radiology, vol.184, no.3, pp. 613-617, 1992.
2. J.Harvey, L. Fajardo, and C. Inis, "Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: Retrospective vs blinded interpretation," AJR Amer. J. Roentgenol., vol.161, pp. 1167-1172, 1993.
3. H.-P. Chan, B. Sahiner, M. Helvie, N. Petrick, M. Roubidoux, T. Wilson, D. Adler, C. Paramagul, J. Newman, and S. Sanjay-Gopal, "Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study," Radiology, vol.212, no.3, pp. 817-827, 1999.
4. Z. Huo, M. Giger, C. Vyborny, and C. Metz, "Breast cancer: Effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms," Radiology, vol.224, no.2, pp. 560-568, 2002.
5. C. Varela, N. Karssemeijer, J. Hendriks, and R. Holland, "Use of prior mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses," Eur. J. Radiol., vol.56, no.2, pp. 248-255, 2005.
6. L.Hadjiiski,B. Sahiner, H.-P. Chan,N. Petrick,M.Helvie, andM.Gurcan, "Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: Computeraided classification ofmalignant and benignmasses," Med. Phys., vol.28, no.11, pp. 2309-2317, 2001.
7. S. Timp, C. Varela, and N. Karssemeijer, "Temporal change analysis for characterisation of mass lesions in mammography," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol.26, no.7, pp. 945-953, Jul. 2007.
8. S. Timp, N. Karssemeijer, and J. Hendriks, "Comparison of three different mass segmentation methods," in Proc. 6th Int. Workshop Digital Mammography, Bremen, Germany,H. Peitgen, Ed. NewYork: Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 218-222.
9. C. Varela, S. Timp, and N. Karssemeijer, "Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses," Phys. Med. Biol., vol.51, no.2, pp. 425-441, 2006.
10. S. Timp, S. van Engeland, and N. Karssemeijer, "A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs," Med. Phys., vol.32, no.8, pp. 2629-2638, 2005.
11. A. Roelofs, S. van Woudenberg, J. Otten, J. Hendriks, A. Bodicker, C. Evertsz, and N. Karssemeijer, "Effect of soft-copy display supported by cad on mammography screening performance," Eur Radiol., vol.16, pp. 45-52, 2006.
12. T. Roelofs, S. van Woudenberg, J. Hendriks, and N. Karssemeijer, "Optimized soft-copy display of digitized mammograms," in Proc. SPIE, Image Percept. Perform., 2003, vol.5043, pp. 10-19.
13. D. Dorfman, K. Berbaum, and C.Metz, "Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method," Invest. Radiol., vol.27, no.9, pp. 723-731, 1992.
14. L. Hadjiiski, H.-P. Chan, B. Sahiner, M. Helvie, M. Roubidoux, C. Blane, C. Paramagul, N. Petrick, J. Bailey, K. Klein, M. Foster, S. Patterson, D. Adler, A. Nees, and J. Shen, "Improvement in radiologists' characterization ofmalignant and benign breastmasses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study," Radiology, vol.233, no.1, pp. 255-265, 2004.
15. S. Beiden, R. Wagner, K. Doi, R. Nishikawa, M. Freedman, S. Lo, and X. Xu, "Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: Analysis of components of variance," Acad. Radiol., vol.9, no.9, pp. 1036-1043, 2002.
16. C. Metz, B. Herman, and C. Roe. (1998, Jan.-Mar.). Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets, Med. Decision Making [Online]. 18(1), pp. 110-121. Available online: http://www-radiology.uchicago.edu/krl/rocstudy.htm
17. N. Obuchowski, "ROC analysis," AJR Amer. J. Roentgenol., vol.184, no.2, pp. 364-372, Feb. 2005.
18. N. Karssemeijer, J. Otten, A. Verbeek, J. Groenewoud, H. de Koning, J. Hendriks, and R. Holland, "Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms," Radiology, vol.227, no.1, pp. 192-200, 2003.
19. D. Manning, S. Ethell, and T. Donovan, "Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph," Br. J. Radiol., vol.77, no.915, pp. 231-235, 2004.
20. R. Smith-Bindman, P. Chu, D. Miglioretti, E. Sickles, R. Blanks, R. Ballard-Barbash, J. Bobo, N. Lee, M. Wallis, J. Patnick, and K. Kerlikowske. (2003, Oct.). Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA [Online]. 290(16), pp. 2129-2137. Available: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids= 14570948