Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 945-953

  Timp, Sheila ^a   Varela, Celia ^b   Karssemeijer, Nico ^c  

^a Dacolian ^*  (Netherlands)

^b Fundacion General del Medio Ambiente de Castilla La Mancha   (Spain)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer aided diagnosis (CAD); Interval changes; Mammography; Mass characterization; Temporal change analysis

Indexed keywords

CHARACTERIZATION; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE REGISTRATION;

INTERVAL CHANGES; MASS CHARACTERIZATION; TEMPORAL CHANGE ANALYSIS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547361474     PISSN: 02780062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2007.897392     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. C. D'Orsi and D. Kopans, "Mammography interpretation: The BI-RADS method," Am. Family Physician, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1548-1552, 1997.
2. S. Orel, N. Kay, C. Reynolds, and D. Sullivan, "BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy," Radiology, vol. 211, no. 3, pp. 845-850, 1999.
3. M. Friedrich and E. Sickles, Eds., Radiological Diagnosis of Breast Diseases. New York: Springer, 2000.
4. M. Homer, Mammographic Interpretation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
5. L. Bassett, B. Shayestehfar, and I. Hirbawi, "Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison: Usefulness and costs," Am. J. Roentgenol., vol. 163, no. 5, pp. 1083-1086, 1994.
6. M. Thurfjell, B. Vitak, E. Azavedo, G. Svane, and E. Thurfjell, "Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms," Acta Radiol., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 52-56, 2000.
7. M. Callaway, C. Boggis, S. Astley, and I. Hutt, "The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma," Clin. Radiol., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 527-529, 1997.
8. C. Varela, N. Karssemeijer, J. Hendriks, and R. Holland, "Use of prior mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses," Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 248-255, 2005.
9. L. Hadjiiski, H.-P. Chan, B. Sahiner, M. Helvie, M. Roubidoux, C. Blane, C. Paramagul, N. Petrick, J. Bailey, K. Klein, M. Foster, S. Patterson, D. Adler, A. Nees, and J. Shen, "Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study," Radiology, vol. 233, no. 1, pp. 255-265, 2004.
10. L. Hadjiiski, B. Sahiner, H.-P. Chan, N. Petrick, M. Helvie, and M. Gurcan, "Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: Computer-aided classification of malignant and benign masses," Med. Phys., vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2309-2317, 2001.
11. Z. Huo, M. Giger, C. Vyborny, and C. Metz, "Breast cancer: Effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms," Radiology, vol. 224, no. 2, pp. 560-568, 2002.
12. H.-P. Chan, B. Sahiner, M. Helvie, N. Petrick, M. Roubidoux, T. Wilson, D. Adler, C. Paramagul, J. Newman, and S. Sanjay-Gopal, "Improvement of radiologists's characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study," Radiology, vol. 212, no. 3, pp. 817-827, 1999.
13. N. Karssemeijer, "Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms," Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 365-378, 1998.
14. S. Timp and N. Karssemeijer, "Interval change analysis to improve computer aided detection in mammography," Med. Image Anal., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 82-95, 2006.
15. S. Timp and N. Karssemeijer, "A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography," Med. Phys., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 958-971, 2004.
16. N. Karssemeijer and G. te Brake, "Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 611-619, Oct. 1996.
17. C. Varela, S. Timp, and N. Karssemeijer, "Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses," Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 425-441, 2006.
18. S. Caulkin, S. Astley, J. Asquith, and C. Boggis, "Sites of occurrence of malignancies in mammograms," in 4th Int. Workshop Digital Mammography, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, N. Karssemeijer, M. Thijssen, J. Hendriks, and L. van Erning, Eds. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1998, pp. 279-282.
19. F. Georgsson, "Differential analysis of bilateral mammograms," Int. J. Pattern Recognition Artif. Intell., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1207-1226, 2003.
20. S. Timp, S. van Engeland, and N. Karssemeijer, "A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs," Med. Phys., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 2629-2638, 2005.
21. S. van Engeland, P. Snoeren, N. Karssemeijer, and J. Hendriks, "A comparison of methods for mammogram registration," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1436-1444, Nov. 2003.
22. N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel Based Learning Methods. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
23. K. Hornik, The R FAQ 2005 [Online]. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/ doc/FAQ
24. J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R. Duin, and J. Matas, "On combining classifiers," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 226-239, Mar. 1998.
25. C. Metz, "ROC methodology in radiographic imaging," Invest. Radiol., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 720-733, 1986.
26. C. Metz, B. Herman, and J. Shen, "Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data," Statist. Med. vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1033-1053, 1998 [Online], Available: http://www-radiology.uchicago.edu/krl/rocstudy.htm
27. C. Metz, B. Herman, and C. Roe, "Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets," Med. Decis. Making vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 110-121, Jan.-Mar. 1998 [Online], Available: http://www-radiology.uchicago.edu/krl/rocstudy.htm
28. P. R. Snoeren and N. Karssemeijer, "Gray scale registration of mammograms using a model of image acquisition," Inf. Process. Med. Imag., vol. 18, pp. 401-412, Jul. 2003.
29. P. Filev, L. Hadjiiski, B. Sahiner, H.-P. Chan, and M. Helvie, "Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms," Med. Phys., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 515-529, 2005.