Simulation of fluid-structure interaction with the interface artificial compressibility method

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 276-289

  Degroote, Joris ^a   Swillens, Abigail ^a   Bruggeman, Peter ^a   Haelterman, Robby ^b   Segers, Patrick ^a   Vierendeels, Jan ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b ROYAL MILITARY ACADEMY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Carotid bifurcation; Fluid structure interaction; Interface artificial compressibility; Interface block quasi Newton

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL SYSTEMS; ARTIFICIAL COMPRESSIBILITY; ARTIFICIAL COMPRESSIBILITY METHOD; BLACK BOXES; CAROTID BIFURCATION; CONTINUITY EQUATIONS; COUPLING ITERATION; FLOW SOLVER; FLUID DOMAIN; FLUID PRESSURES; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERFACES; INTERFACE BLOCKS; QUASI-NEWTON; SOURCE TERMS; STRUCTURAL SOLVER;

BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); COMPRESSIBILITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW FIELDS; FLUIDS; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 77953101811     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1276     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Quarteroni A. Cardiovascular mathematics. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Sanz-Solé M, Soria J, Varona J, Verdera J (eds), vol. I. European Mathematical Society: Madrid, Spain, 2006; 479-512.
2. Dumont K, Vierendeels J, Segers P, Van Nooten G, Verdonck P. Predicting ATS open pivot (TM) heart valve performance with computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2005; 14(3): 393-399.
3. Dumont K, Vierendeels J, Kaminsky R, Van Nooten G, Verdonck P, Bluestein D. Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the ASME 2007; 129(4):558-565
4. dos Santos N, Gerbeau JF, Bourgat JF. Partitioned FSI strategy for simulations of a thin elastic valve. In European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECCOMAS CFD 2006), Delft, The Netherlands, Wesseling P, Oñate E, Périaux J (eds). 2006; 1-10.
5. Taylor C, Draney M, Ku J, Parker D, Steele B, Wang K, Zarins C. Predictive medicine: computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Computer Aided Surgery 1999; 4:231-247.
6. Wilson N, Arko F, Taylor C. Predicting changes in blood flow in patient-specific operative plans for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease. Computer Aided Surgery 2005; 10(4):257-277.
7. Formaggia L, Gerbeau JF, Nobile F, Quarteroni A. On the coupling of 3D and 1D Navier-Stokes equations for flow problems in compliant vessels. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 191: 561-582.
8. Cebral J, Löhner R, Soto O, Choyke P, Yim P. Patient-Specific Simulation of Carotid Artery Stenting using Computational Fluid Dynamics, Chapter 280. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2208. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001; 193-219.
9. Gerbeau JF, Vidrascu M, Frey P. Fluid-structure interaction in blood flows on geometries based on medical imaging. Computers and Structures 2005; 83(2-3):155-165.
10. Hron J, Turek S. A monolithic FEM/multigrid solver for ALE formulation of fluid structure interaction with application in biomechanics. In Fluid-Structure Interaction-Modelling, Simulation, Optimisation, Bungartz HJ, Schäfer M (eds), Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 53. Springer: Berlin, 2006; 146-170. ISBN: 3-540-34595-7.
11. Causin P, Gerbeau JF, Nobile F. Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194(42-44): 4506-4527.
12. Küttler U, Wall W. Fixed-point fluid-structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation. Computational Mechanics 2008; DOI: 101007/s00466-008-0255-5.
13. Vierendeels J. Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid-structure interaction solvers using reduced-order models. In Fluid-Structure Interaction-Modelling, Simulation, Optimisation, Bungartz HJ, Schäfer M (eds), Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 53. Springer: Berlin, 2006; 1-18. ISBN: 3-540-34595-7.
14. Vierendeels J, Lanoye L, Degroote J, Verdonck P. Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid-structure interaction problems with reduced order models. Computers and Structures 2007; 85(11-14):970-976.
15. Degroote J, Bathe KJ, Vierendeels J. Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction. Computers and Structures 2009; 87(11-12):793-801. DOI: 10.1016/ j.compstruc.2008.11.013.
16. Heil M. An efficient solver for the fully coupled solution of large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193:1-23.
17. Bathe KJ, Zhang H. Finite element developments for general fluid flows with structural interactions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 60:213-232.
18. Matthies H, Steindorf J. Partitioned strong coupling algorithms for fluid-structure interaction. Computers and Structures 2003; 81:805-812.
19. Matthies H, Niekamp R, Steindorf J. Algorithms for strong coupling procedures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:2028-2049.
20. Dettmer W, Perić D. A computational framework for fluid-structure interaction: finite element formulation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(41-43):5754-5779.
21. Tezduyar T, Sathe S. Modelling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 54(6-8):855-900.
22. Tezduyar T, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin B. Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space-time fluid-structure interaction technique. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2008; 57(5): 601-629.
23. Peskin C. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. Journal of Computational Physics 1972; 10:252-271.
24. Peskin C. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica 2002; 11:479-517.
25. van Loon R, Anderson P, de Hart J, Baaijens F. A combined fictitious domain/adaptive meshing method for fluid-structure interaction in heart valves. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2004; 46:533-544.
26. van Loon R, Anderson P, van de Vosse F. A fluid-structure interaction method with solid-rigid contact for heart valve dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 217:806-823.
27. Gerbeau JF, Vidrascu M. A quasi-Newton algorithm based on a reduced model for fluid-structure interaction problems in blood flows. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 2003; 37(4): 631-648.
28. Degroote J, Bruggeman P, Haelterman R, Vierendeels J. Stability of a coupling technique for partitioned solvers in FSI applications. Computers and Structures 2008; 86:2224-2234. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.05.005.
29. Riemslagh K, Vierendeels J, Dick E. Coupling of a Navier-Stokes solver and an elastic boundary solver for unsteady problems. In Fourth European Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Papailiou K, Tsahalis D, Périaux J, Hirsch C, Pandolfi M (eds). Wiley: Athens, Greece, 1998; 1040-1045.
30. Vierendeels J, Riemslagh K, Dick E, Verdonck P. Computer simulation of intraventricular flow and pressure gradients during diastole. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2000; 122:667-674.
31. Råback P, Ruokolainen J, Lyly M, Järvinen E. Fluid-structure interaction boundary conditions by artificial compressibility. ECCOMAS Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Swansea, Wales, U.K., 2001.
32. Råback P, Järvinen E, Ruokolainen J. Computing the artificial compressibility field for partitioned fluid-structure interaction simulations. Eighth World Congress on Computational Mechanics, 5th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Venice, Italy, 2008; 1.
33. Riemslagh K, Vierendeels J, Dick E. An efficient coupling procedure for flexible wall fluid-structure interaction. European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain, 2000; 13.
34. Vierendeels J, Riemslagh K, Dick E. Flow in moving geometries and fluid-structure interaction. Course Given on 23 August 2001 during the European Mathematical Society Euro Summer School, Charles University, Prague, August 2001.
35. Chorin A. A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems. Journal of Computational Physics 1967; 2:12-26.
36. Témam R. Sur l'approximation de la solution des équations de Navier-Stokes par la méthode des pas fractionnaires (ii). Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 1969; 33(5):377-385.
37. Peyret R. Unsteady evolution of a horizontal jet in a stratified fluid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1976; 78(1): 49-63.
38. Merkle C, Athavale M. Time-accurate unsteady incompressible flow algorithm based on artificial compressibility. AIAA Paper 87-1137, 1987; 397-407.
39. Botnar R, Rappitsch G, Scheidegger M, Liepsch D, Perktold K, Boesiger P. Hemodynamics in the carotid artery bifurcation: a comparison between numerical simulations and in vitro MRI measurements. Journal of Biomechanics 2000; 33:137-144.
40. Prosi M, Perktold K, Ding Z, Friedman M. Influence of curvature dynamics on pulsatile coronary artery flow in a realistic bifurcation model. Journal of Biomechanics 2004; 37:1767-1775.
41. Scotti C, Finol E. Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a fluid-structure interaction study. Computers and Structures 2007; 85:1097-1113.
42. Perktold K, Rappitsch G. Computer simulation of local blood flow and vessel mechanics in a compliant carotid artery bifurcation model. Journal of Biomechanics 1995; 28(7):845-856.
43. Yanga X, Liu Y, Yang J. Fluid-structure interaction in a pulmonary arterial bifurcation. Journal of Biomechanics 2007; 40:2694-2699.
44. Marzo A, Luo X, Bertram C. Three-dimensional collapse and steady flow in thick-walled flexible tubes. Journal of Fluids and Structures 2005; 20:817-835.
45. Lesoinne M, Farhat C. Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes and their impact on aeroelastic computations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 134:71-90.
46. Farhat C, Lesoinne M, Le Tallec P. Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 157:95-114.
47. de Boer A, van Zuijlen A, Bijl H. Review of coupling methods for non-matching meshes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2007; 196:1515-1525.
48. Vierendeels J, Dumont K, Dick E, Verdonck P. Analysis and stabilization of fluid-structure interaction algorithm for rigid-body motion. AIAA Journal 2005; 43(12):2549-2557.
49. Mok D, Wall W. Partitioned analysis schemes for the transient interaction of incompressible flows and nonlinear flexible structures. In Trends in Computational Structural Mechanics, Schweizerhof K, Wall K, Bletzinger WA (eds). CIMNE: Barcelona, 2001.
50. Golub GH, Loan CFV. Matrix Computations (3rd edn). Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, U.S.A., 1996.
51. Eisenstat S, Elman H, Schultz M. Variational iterative methods for nonsymmetric systems of linear equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1983; 20(2):345-357.
52. Fernandez M, Moubachir M. A Newton method using exact Jacobians for solving fluid-structure coupling. Computers and Structures 2005; 83:127-142.