Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 157, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 95-114

  Farhat, C ^a   Lesoinne, M ^a   LeTallec, P ^b  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; ALGORITHMS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTACTS (FLUID MECHANICS); ENERGY CONSERVATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STRUCTURAL LOADS;

NON MATCHING DISCRETE INTERFACES;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

AERODYNAMICS; FLUID FLOW; INTERACTION; STRUCTURE;

FLUID FLOW; INTERACTIONS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

EID: 0032053181     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00216-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. [1] J. Donea, An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient fluid-structure interactions, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 33 (1982) 689-723.
2. [2] C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne and N. Maman, Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 21 (1995) 807-835.
3. [3] J.T. Batina, Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA Paper No. 89-0115, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 9-12, 1989.
4. [4] O.A. Kandil and H.A. Chuang, Unsteady vortex-dominated flows around maneuvering wings over a wide range of Mach numbers, AIAA Paper No. 88-0317, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 11-14, 1988.
5. [5] C. Farhat and T.Y. Lin, Transient aeroelastic computations using multiple moving frames of reference, AIAA Paper No. 90-3053, AIAA 8th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Portland, Oregon, August 20-22, 1990.
6. [6] T. Tezduyar, M. Behr and J. Liou, A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces - The deforming spatial domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 94 (1992) 339-351.
7. [7] A. Masud, A space-time finite element method for fluid structure interaction, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1993.
8. [8] M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, Stability analysis of dynamic meshes for transient aeroelastic computations, AIAA Paper 93-3325, 11th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL, July 6-9, 1993.
9. [9] C. Farhat, High performance simulation of coupled nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems, AGARD Report R-807, Special Course on Parallel Computing in CFD (l'Aérodynamique numérique et le calcul en parallèle), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) October 1995.
10. [10] G.P. Guruswamy, Time-accurate unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations of wings using Euler equations, AIAA Paper 88-2281, AIAA 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, April 18-20, 1988.
11. [11] H.J.-P. Morand and R. Ohayon, Fluid Structure Interaction (J. Wiley, 1995).
12. [12] C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, P.S. Chen and S. Lantéri, Parallel heterogeneous algorithms for the solution of three-dimensional transient coupled aeroelastic problems, AIAA Paper 95-1290, AIAA 36th Structural Dynamics Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, April 10-13, 1995.
13. [13] S. Piperno, C. Farhat and B. Larrouturou, Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 124 (1995) 79-11.
14. [14] J. Mouro, Numerical simulation of nonlinear fluid structure interactions problems and application to hydraulic shock-absorbers, in: Proc. Third World Conf. Appl. Computational Fluid Dynamics, Basel World User Days CFD, May 19-23, 1996.
15. [15] N. Maman and C. Farhat, Matching fluid and structure meshes for aeroelastic computations: a parallel approach, Comput. Struct. 54 (1995) 779-785.
16. [16] R. Lohner, Robust, vectorized search algorithms for interpolation on unstructured grids, J. Comput. Phys. 118 (1995) 380-387.
17. [17] M.H.L. Hounjet and B.J.G. Eussen, Outline and application of the NRL aeroelastic simulation method, Nationaal Lucht-En Ruimtevaartlaboratorium, NLR TP 94422 L, 1994.
18. [18] R.L. Harder and R.N. Desmarais, Interpolation using surface splines, J. Aircraft 9 (1972) 189-191.
19. [19] C. Bernardi, Y. Maday and T. Patera, A new non-conforming approach to domain decomposition; the mortar element method, in: Collège de France Seminar, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and their Applications, 1990.
20. [20] Y. Maday, Private communication.
21. [21] P. Le Tallec, T. Sassi and M. Vidrascu, Three-dimensional domain decomposition methods with nonmatching grids and unstructured coarse solvers, in: D. Keyes and J. Xu, eds., Proc. Seventh Int. Symposium on Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Penn State, October 93, AMS, Providence, 1994.
22. [22] M.C. Sandford, D.A. Seidel, C.V. Eckstrom and C.V. Spain, Geometric and structural properties of an Aeroelastic Research Wing (ARW-2), NASA Technical Memorandum 4110, April 1989.
23. [23] P.L. George, Improvement on Delaunay based 3D automatic mesh generator, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 25 (1997) 297-317