Predicting changes in blood flow in patient-specific operative plans for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 257-277

  Wilson, Nathan M ^a,c   Arko, Frank R ^b   Taylor, Charles A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortoiliac occlusive disease; Finite element analysis; Hemodynamic simulation; Patient specific

Indexed keywords

ARTERY OCCLUSION; BLOOD FLOW; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SURGICAL PATIENT; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AORTIC DISEASES; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 30344477979     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10929080500230445     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. Rutherford RB, editor. Vascular surgical procedures. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company, 2000.
2. Taylor CA, Draney MT, Ku JP, Parker D, Steele BN, Wang K, Zarins CK. Predictive medicine: computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Comput Aided Surg 1999;4:231-247.
3. Wilson NM. Geometric algorithms and software architecture for computational prototyping: applications in vascular surgery and MEMS. PhD Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, December 2002.
4. Wilson NM, Wang K, Dutton RW, Taylor CA. A software framework for creating patient specific geometric models from medical imaging data for simulation based medical planning of vascular surgery. In: Niessen W, Viergever M, editors. Proceedings of the 4th International conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001), Utrecht, The Netherlands, October 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2208. Berlin: Springer; 2001. pp 449-456.
5. Taylor CA. A computational framework for investigating hemodynamic factors in vascular adaptation and disease. PhD Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, August 1996.
6. Wilson NM, Arko FR, Taylor CA. Patient-specific operative planning for aortofemoral reconstruction procedures. In: Barillot C, Haynor DR, Hellier P, editors. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2004), St. Malo, France, October 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3217. Berlin: Springer; 2004. pp 422-429.
7. Wilson NM, Arko FR, Zarins CK, Olcott C, Taylor CA. Preoperative computational modeling of aortofemoral reconstructions to predict postoperative hemodynamic results. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Symposium on Vascular Surgery, Rancho Mirage, CA, 10-13 March, 2004, p 110.
8. Wilson NM, Arko FR, Taylor CA. An integrated software system for preoperatively evaluating aortofemoral reconstruction procedures. Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Summer Bioengineering Conference, Miami, FL, 25-29 June, 2003, pp 899-900.
9. Draney MT, Alley MT, Tang BT, Wilson NM, Herfkens RJ, Taylor CA. Importance of 3D nonlinear gradient corrections for quantitative analysis of 3D MR angiographic data. Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Tenth Scientific Meeting & Exhibition (ISMRM 2002), Honolulu, Hawaii, 18-24 May, 2002.
10. Ku JP, Draney MT, Arko FR, Lee WA, Chan FP, Pelc NJ, Zarins CK, Taylor CA. In vivo validation of numerical predication of blood flow in arterial bypass grafts. Ann Biomed Eng 2002;30:743-752.
11. Steele BN, Wan J, Ku JP, Hughes TJR, Taylor CA. In vivo validation of a one-dimensional finite element method for simulation-based medical planning for cardiovascular bypass surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50:649-656.
12. Ku JP, Elkins CJ, Taylor CA. Comparison of CFD and MRI flow and velocities in an in vitro larger artery bypass graft model. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33(3):257-269.
13. Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Rubin GD, Napel S. Automated flight path planning for virtual endoscopy. Med Phys 1998;25:629-637.
14. Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen W. The Visualization Toolkit. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1998.
15. Wang K. Level set methods for computational prototyping with application to hemodynamic modeling. PhD Dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, August 2001.
16. Osher S, Sethian JA. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 1988;79:12-49.
17. Malladi R, Kimmel R, Adalsteinsson D, Sapiro G, Caselles V, Sethian JA. A geometric approach to segmentation and analysis of 3D medical images. Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, San Francisco, CA, June 1996. pp 244-252.
18. Sethian JA. Level set methods and fast marching methods. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press; 1999.
19. Parasolid reference manual. EDS, Inc., Plano, TX, USA.
20. Davidovic LB, Lotina SI, Kostic DM, Cinara II, Cvetkovic SD, Stojanovic PL, Velimirovic, LB, Markovic DM, Pejkic SL, Pavlovic G. Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene aortobifemoral grafts. Srp Arh Celok Lek 1997;125(3-4):75-83.
21. Devine C, McCollum C. Heparin-bonded dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene for femoralpopliteal bypass grafting: a multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 2001;33(3):533-539.
22. Zakhariev T, Grozdinski L, Stankev M, Chirkov A. A comparative assessment of the results of end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses in arterial reconstructions of the aortoiliac segment. Khirurgiia (Sofiia) 1995;48(1):37-42.
23. den Hoed PT, Veen HF. The late complications of aortoiliofemoral Dacron prostheses: dilatation and anastomotic aneurysm formation. Eur J Vasc Surg 1992;6(3):282-287.
24. van der Akker PJ, Brand R, van Schilfgaarde R, van Bockel JH, Terpstra JL. False aneurysms after prosthetic reconstructions for aortoiliac obstructive disease. Ann Surg 1989;210(5):658-666.
25. Harris P, How T. Haemodynamics of cuffed arterial anastomoses. Int J Vasc Med 1999;9(1):20-26.
26. Sieswerda C, Skotnicki SH, Barentsz JO, Heystraten FM. Anastomotic aneurysms - an underdiagnosed complication after aortoiliac reconstructions. Eur J Vasc Surg 1989;3(3):233-238.
27. Swartbol P, Albrechtsson U, Parsson H, Norgren L. Dialation of aortobifemoral knitted Dacron grafts after a mean implantation of 5 years. Int Angiol 1996;15(3):236-239.
28. Florez-Valencia L, Montagnat J, Orkisz M. 3D graphical models for vascular-stent pose simulation. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Graphics (ICCVG 2002), Zakopane, Poland, September 2002. pp 25-29.
29. Isokangas JM, Hietala R, Perala J, Tervonen O. Accuracy of computer-aided measurements in endovascular stent-graft planning. Invest Radiol 2003;38(3):164-170.
30. Dumoulin C, Cochelin B. Mechanical behaviour modelling of balloon-expandable stems. J Biomech 2000;33:1461-1470.
31. Coenegrachts K, Rigauts H, Letter JD. Prediction of aortoiliac stent graft length: comparison of a semiautomated computed tomography angiography method and calibrated aortography. J Comp Assist Tomogr 2003;22(2):284-288.
32. Auricchio F, Loreto MD, Sacco E. Finite-element analysis of a stenotic artery revascularization through a stent insertion. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2001;4:249-263.
33. Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CAJ, Stadler, M. Mechanics of angioplasty: wall, balloon and stent. Casey J, Bao G, editors. Proceedings in Mechanics in Biology, AMD-Vol. 242, BED-Vol. 46. New York, 2000. pp 141-156.
34. Pelc NJ, Herkens RJ, Shimakawa A, Enzmann DR. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Quart 1991;7(4):229-254.
35. Pelc NJ, Sommer FG, Li KCP, Brosnan TJ, Herfkens RJ, Enzmann DR. Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. Magn Reson Quart 1994;10(3):125-147.
36. Figueroa CA, Jansen KC, Hughes TJR, Taylor CA. A coupled momentum method to model blood flow in deformable arteries. Proceedings Sixth World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Beijing, China. 5-10 September 2004, Paper no. 635 on CDROM.
37. Womersley JR. Oscillatory motion of a viscous fluid in a thin-walled elastic tube - I: the linear approximation for long waves. Phil Mag 1955;7:199-221.
38. Wan J, Steele B, Spicer SA, Strohband S, Feijoo GR, Hughes TJR, Taylor CA. A one-dimensional finite element method for simulation-based medical planning for cardiovascular disease. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2002;5(3):195-206.
39. Steele BN. A simulation-based medical planning system for occlusive cardiovascular disease using one dimensional analysis techniques. PhD dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, August 2003.
40. Vignon IE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for one-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure waves in arteries. Wave Motion 2004;39:361-374.
41. Steele BN, Taylor CA. Simulation of blood flow in the abdominal aorta at rest and during exercise using a 1-D finite element method with impedance boundary conditions derived from a fractal tree. In: Proceedings of ASME Summer Bioengineering Meeting, Key Biscayne, FL, June 2003. pp 813-814.
42. Müller J, Nagrath S, Li X, Jansen KE, Shephard MS. Efficient computational methods for the investigation of cardiovascular disease. Proceedings of the US National Congress on Computational Mechanics (USNCCM7), Albuquerque, NM, July 2003.
43. Taylor CA, Hughes TJR, Zarins CK. Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 1998;158:155-196.
44. Taylor CA, Hughes TJR, Zarins CK. Finite element modeling of three-dimensional pulsatile flow in the abdominal aorta: relevance to atherosclerosis. Ann Biomed Eng 1998;26:975-987.
45. Taylor CA, Hughes TJR, Zarins CK. Effect of exercise on hemodynamic conditions in the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 1999;29(6):1077-1089.
46. Vignon IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng, in press.
47. Taylor CA, Hughes TJR. A multiscale finite element method for blood flow in deformable vessels. Proceedings of the 1998 World Congress of Biomechanics, Sapporo, Japan, 1998.
48. Shim EB, Kamm RD, Heldt T, Mark RG. Numerical analysis of blood flow through a stenosed artery using a coupled multiscale simulation method. Comp Cardiol 2000;27:219-222.
49. Laganà K, Dubini G, Migliavacca F, Pietrabissa R, Pennati G, Veneziani A, Quarteroni A. Multiscale modelling as a tool to prescribe realistic boundary conditions for the study of surgical procedures. Biorheology 2002;39(3-4):359-364.
50. Formaggia L, Gerbeau JF, Nobile F, Quartoni A. Numerical treatment of defective boundary conditions for the Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J Numer Anal 2002;40(1):376-401.
51. Formaggia L, Gerbeau JF, Nobile F, Quartoni A. On the coupling of 3D and 1D Navier-Stokes equations for flow problems in compliant vessels. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 2001;191:561-582.
52. Franca LP, Frey SL. Stabilized finite element methods ii. The incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 1992;99(2-3):209-233.
53. Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM. Generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 2000;190(3-4):305-319.
54. Whiting CH, Jansen KE. A stabilized finite element method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using a hierarchical basis. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2001;35:93-116.
55. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR. Streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin formulation for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 1981;32:199-259.
56. Karypis G, Kumar V. Multilevel algorithms for multiconstraint graph partitioning. University of Minnesota, Department of Computer Science/Army HPC Research Center, Minneapolis, Technical Report no. 98-019.
57. Cheng CP, Parker D, Taylor CA. Quantification of wall shear stress in large blood vessels using Lagrangian interpolation functions with cine PC-MRI. Ann Biomed Eng 2002;30(8):1020-1032.
58. Taylor CA, Cheng CP, Espinosa LA, Tang BT, Parker D, Herfkens RJ. In vivo quantification of blood flow and wall shear stress in the human abdominal aorta during lower limb exercise. Ann Biomed Eng 2002;30(3):402-408.
59. Ganong WFM. Review of medical physiology. Englewood Cliffs: Appleton & Lange; 1995.
60. Cheng CP, Herfkens RJ, Taylor CA. Comparison of abdominal aortic hemodynamics between men and women at rest and during lower limb exercise. J Vasc Surg, 2002;37(1):118-123.
61. Seeley BD, Young DF. Effect of geometry on pressure losses across models of arterial stenoses. J Biomech 1976;9(7):439-448.
62. Post PN, Kievit J, van Bockel JH. Optimal follow-up strategies after aortoiliac prosthetic reconstruction: a decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;28(3):287-295.