Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction

Computers and Structures

Volumn 87, Issue 11-12, 2009, Pages 793-801

  Degroote, Joris ^a   Bathe, Klaus Jürgen ^b   Vierendeels, Jan ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Fluid structure interaction; Monolithic; Newton Raphson; Partitioned; Quasi Newton

Indexed keywords

COUPLED PROBLEMS; FLOW EQUATIONS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS; INDUSTRIAL PROBLEMS; INTERFACE POSITIONS; MONOLITHIC; NEWTON ALGORITHMS; NEWTON-RAPHSON; NEWTON-RAPHSON ITERATIONS; PARTITIONED; QUASI-NEWTON; SOLUTION STRATEGIES; SPARSE SOLVERS; STRUCTURAL CONFIGURATIONS; STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS;

FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; FLUIDS;

NONLINEAR EQUATIONS;

EID: 67349096693     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Farhat C., van der Zee K., and Geuzaine P. Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195 (2006) 1973-2001
2. Willcox K, Paduano J, Peraire J. Low order aerodynamic models for aeroelastic control of turbomachines. In: Proceedings of 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials (SDM) Conference. St Louis, MO, USA; 1999. p. 1-11.
3. Agamloh E, Wallace A, von Jouanne A. Application of fluid-structure interaction simulation of an ocean wave energy extraction device. In: Proceedings of 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, vol. AIAA 2006-1001. Reno, NV, USA; 2006. p. 1-14.
4. Stein K., Tezduyar T., Kumar V., Sathe S., Benney R., and Charles R. Numerical simulation of soft landing for clusters of cargo parachutes. In: Niettaanmäki P., Rossi T., Majava K., and Pieronneau O. (Eds). European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering ECCOMAS 2004 (2004), Jyväskylä, Finland 1-4
5. dos Santos N, Gerbeau JF, Bourgat JF. Partitioned FSI strategy for simulations of a thin elastic valve. In: Wesseling P, Oñate E, Périaux J, editors. European conference on computational fluid dynamics ECCOMAS CFD 2006. Delft, The Netherlands: ECCOMAS; 2006. p. 1-10.
6. Dumont K., Vierendeels J., Kaminsky R., Van Nooten G., Verdonck P., and Bluestein D. Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model. J Biomech Eng - Trans ASME 129 4 (2007) 558-565
7. Taylor C., Draney M., Ku J., Parker D., Steele B., Wang K., et al. Predictive medicine: computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Comput Aid Surg 4 (1999) 231-247
8. Bathe M., and Kamm R. A fluid-structure interaction finite element analysis of pulsatile blood flow through a compliant stenotic artery. J Biomech Eng 121 4 (1999) 361-369
9. Kaazempur-Mofrad M., Bathe M., Karcher H., Younis H., Seong H., Shim E., et al. The role of simulation in understanding biological systems. Comput Struct 81 8-11 (2003) 715-726
10. Wilson N., Arko F., and Taylor C. Predicting changes in blood flow in patient-specific operative plans for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease. Comput Aid Surg 10 4 (2005) 257-277
11. Bathe K.J., Zhang H., and Wang M. Finite element analysis of incompressible and compressible fluid flows with free surfaces and structural interactions. Comput Struct 56 2-3 (1995) 193-213
12. Rugonyi S., and Bathe K.J. On the finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions. Comput Model Eng Sci 2 (2001) 195-212
13. Heil M. An efficient solver for the fully coupled solution of large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193 (2004) 1-23
14. Bathe K.J., and Zhang H. Finite element developments for general fluid flows with structural interactions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 60 (2004) 213-232
15. Hron J., and Turek S. A monolithic FEM/multigrid solver for ALE formulation of fluid structure interaction with application in biomechanics. Fluid-structure interaction - modelling, simulation, optimisation. In: Bungartz H.J., and Schäfer M. (Eds). Lecture notes in computational science and engineering vol. 53 (2006), Springer, Berlin. 3-540-34595-7 146-170
16. Matthies H., and Steindorf J. Partitioned strong coupling algorithms for fluid-structure interaction. Comput Struct 81 (2003) 805-812
17. Matthies H., Niekamp R., and Steindorf J. Algorithms for strong coupling procedures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195 (2006) 2028-2049
18. Gerbeau J.F., and Vidrascu M. A quasi-Newton algorithm based on a reduced model for fluid-structure interaction problems in blood flows. ESAIM: Math Model Numer Anal 37 4 (2003) 631-648
19. Gerbeau J.F., Vidrascu M., and Frey P. Fluid-structure interaction in blood flows on geometries based on medical imaging. Comput Struct 83 2-3 (2005) 155-165
20. van Brummelen E, Michler C, de Borst R. Interface-GMRES(R) acceleration of subiteration for fluid-structure-interaction problems. Report DACS-05-001 2005. Available from: http://www.em.lr.tudelft.nl/downloads/DACS-05-001.pdf.
21. Michler C., van Brummelen E., and de Borst R. Error-amplification analysis of subiteration-preconditioned GMRES for fluid-structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195 (2006) 2124-2148
22. Michler C., van Brummelen E., and de Borst R. An interface Newton-Krylov solver for fluid-structure interaction. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 47 10-11 (2005) 1189-1195
23. Causin P., Gerbeau J.F., and Nobile F. Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194 42-44 (2005) 4506-4527
24. Degroote J., Bruggeman P., Haelterman R., and Vierendeels J. Stability of a coupling technique for partitioned solvers in FSI applications. Comput Struct 86 23-24 (2008) 2224-2234
25. Küttler U., and Wall W. Fixed-point fluid-structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation. Comput Mech (2008)
26. Lesoinne M., and Farhat C. A higher-order subiteration free staggered algorithm for non-linear transient aeroelastic problems. AIAA J 36 9 (1998) 1754-1756
27. Piperno S., Farhat C., and Larrouturou B. Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems - Part I: model problem, theory and two-dimensional application. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 124 (1995) 79-112
28. van Zuijlen A., de Boer A., and Bijl H. Higher-order time integration through smooth mesh deformation for 3D fluid structure interaction simulations. J Comput Phys 224 (2007) 414-430
29. Vierendeels J., Lanoye L., Degroote J., and Verdonck P. Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid-structure interaction problems with reduced order models. Comput Struct 85 11-14 (2007) 970-976
30. Vierendeels J. Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid-structure interaction solvers using reduced-order models. In: Bungartz H.J., and Schäfer M. (Eds). Fluid-structure interaction - modelling simulation, optimisation. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering vol. 53 (2006), Springer, Berlin. 3-540-34595-7 1-18
31. Michler C., van Brummelen E., Hulshoff S., and de Borst R. The relevance of conservation for stability and accuracy of numerical methods for fluid structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192 (2003) 4195-4215
32. Fernandez M., and Moubachir M. A Newton method using exact Jacobians for solving fluid-structure coupling. Comput Struct 83 (2005) 127-142
33. Bathe K.J., and Ledezma G. Benchmark problems for incompressible fluid flows with structural interactions. Comput Struct 85 (2007) 628-644
34. Mok D., Wall W., and Ramm E. Accelerated iterative substructuring schemes for instationary fluid-structure interaction. In: Bathe K.J. (Ed). Computational fluid and solid mechanics (2001), Elsevier 1325-1328
35. Zhang H., and Bathe K.J. Direct and iterative computing of fluid flows fully coupled with structures. Proceedings of the first MIT conference on computational fluid and solid mechanics. In: Bathe K.J. (Ed). Computational fluid and solid mechanics vol. 2 (2001), Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, USA
36. ADINA R&D Inc., Watertown, MA, USA. Theory and modeling guide volume III: ADINA CFD & FSI; 2008. Report ARD 08-9.
37. Lesoinne M., and Farhat C. Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes and their impact on aeroelastic computations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 134 (1996) 71-90
38. Bathe K.J. Conserving energy and momentum in nonlinear dynamics: a simple implicit time integration scheme. Comput Struct 85 (2007) 437-445
39. Golub G.H., and Loan C.F.V. Matrix computations. 3rd ed. (1996), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA
40. Bathe K.J., and Zhang H. A flow-condition-based interpolation finite element procedure for incompressible fluid flows. Comput Struct 80 (2002) 1267-1277
41. Sussman T., and Bathe K.J. A finite element formulation for nonlinear incompressible elastic and inelastic analysis. Comput Struct 26 (1987) 357-409
42. Bathe K.J. Finite element procedures (1996), Prentice Hall
43. Bathe K.J. Encyclopedia of computer science and engineering. In: Wah B. (Ed). Chapter the finite element method 1 (2008), John Wiley & Sons 10.1002/9780470050118.ecse159