Fluid-structure interaction in blood flows on geometries based on medical imaging

Computers and Structures

Volumn 83, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 155-165

  Gerbeau, Jean Frédéric ^a   Vidrascu, Marina ^a   Frey, Pascal ^b  

^a INRIA ROCQUENCOURT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Added mass effect; Blood flows; Fluid structure interaction; Mesh generation; Newton Krylov algorithms

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BLOOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW OF FLUIDS; MEDICAL IMAGING;

ADDED-MASS EFFECT; BLOOD FLOWS; MESH GENERATION; NEWTON-KRYLOV ALGORITHMS;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 18844458168     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.083     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall; 1996.
2. Bathe KJ, Zhang H. Finite element developments for general fluid flows with structural interactions. Int J Numer Meth Engng 2004, in press.
3. Bathe KJ, Zhang H, Ji S. Finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interaction. Comput Struct 1999;72(1-3):1-16.
4. Berger MJ, Jameson A. Automatic adaptive grid refinement for Euler equations. AIAA J 1985;23(4):561-8.
5. Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera AT. A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method. In: Nonlinear partial differential equations and their applications Collège de France Seminar, Vol XI (Paris, 1989-1991).
6. Pitman Res Notes Math Ser, vol. 299. Longman Sci. Tech.; 1994. p. 13-51.
7. Borouchaki H, Frey PJ. Adaptive triangular-quadrilateral mesh generation. Int J Numer Meth Engng 1997;41: 915-34.
8. Brown PN, Saad Y. Convergence theory of nonlinear Newton-Krylov algorithms. SIAM J Optim 1994;4(2): 297-330.
9. Carrive M, Le Tallec P, Mouro J. Approximation par elments finis d'un modle de coques minces gomtriquement exact. Revue Europenne des Elments Finis 1995;4(5-6): 633-62.
10. Castro-Diaz MJ, Hecht F, Mohammadi B. New progress in anisotropic grid adaptation for inviscid and viscous flows simulations. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Meshing Roundtable, Albuquerque, USA, October 1995.
11. Causin P, Gerbeau J-F, Nobile F. Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems. INRIA Research Report No 5084, 2004.
12. Chapelle D, Bathe KJ. The finite element analysis of shells - fundamentals. Springer Verlag; 2003.
13. Deparis S, Fernández MA, Formaggia L. Acceleration of a fixed point algorithm for a fluid-structure interaction using transpiration conditions. Math Model Numer Anal 2003; 37(4):601-16.
14. Deparis S, Gerbeau J-F, Vasseur X. A dynamic preconditioner for Newton-Krylor Algorithms. Application to Fluid Structure Interaction, INRIA Research Report No 5352, 2004.
15. Farhat C, Lesoinne M, Le Tallec P. Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng 1998; 157:95-114.
16. Farhat C, van der Zee K, Geuzaine Ph. Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear aeroelasticity, in preparation.
17. Fernández MA, Moubachir M. An exact block-Newton algorithm for the solution of implicit time discretized coupled systems involved in fluid-structure interaction problems. In: Bathe KJ, editor. Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics. Elsevier; 2003.
18. Formaggia L, Gerbeau J-F, Nobile F, Quarteroni A. On the coupling of 3D and ID Navier-Stokes equations for flow problems in compliant vessels. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engng 2001;191(6-7):561-82.
19. P.J. Frey. About surface remeshing. In Proc.of 9th Int. Meshing Roundtable, New Orleans, USA, 2000.
20. Frey PJ, Borouchaki H. Surface meshing using a geometric error estimate. Int J Numer Meth Engng 2003;58(2): 227-45.
21. Frey PJ, George PL. Mesh generation. Application to finite elements. Paris, Oxford: Hermès Science Publ.; 2000.
22. George PL, Borouchaki H, Frey PJ, Laug P, Saltel E. Mesh generation and mesh adaptivity: theory, techniques. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes TJR, editors. Encyclopedia of computational mechanics. Higher Education Press, John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
23. Gerbeau J-F. A quasi-Newton method for a fluid-structure problem arising in blood flows. In: Bathe KJ, editor. Proceedings of the second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics. Elsevier; 2003. p. 1355-7.
24. Gerbeau JF, Vidrascu M. A quasi-Newton algorithm based on a reduced model for fluid-structure interactions problems in blood flows. Math Model Numer Anal 2003; 37(4):631-48.
25. Knoll DA, Keyes DE. Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications. J Comp Phys 2004;193:2.
26. Le Tallec P, Mouro J. Fluid structure interaction with large structural displacements. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng 2001;190:3039-67.
27. Lesoinne M, Farhat C. Higher-order subiteration-free staggered algorithm for nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems. AIAA J 1998;36(9):1754-7.
28. Matthies HG, Steindorf J. How to make weak coupling strong. In: Bathe KJ, editor. Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics. Elsevier; 2001. p. 1317-9.
29. Matthies HG, Steindorf J. Partitioned but strongly coupled iteration schemes for nonlinear fluid-structure interaction. Comput Struct 2002;80(27-30):1991-9.
30. Mok DP, Wall WA. Partitioned analysis schemes for the transient interaction of incompressible flows and nonlinear flexible structures. In: Schweizerhof K, Wall WA, Bletzinger KU, editors. Trends in computational structural mechanics, Barcelona, 2001. CIMNE.
31. Mok DP, Wall WA, Ramm E. Partitioned analysis approach for the transient, coupled response of viscous fluids and flexible structures. In: Wunderlich W, editor, Proceedings of the European Conference on Computational Mechanics, ECCM'99, TU Munich, 1999.
32. Mok DP, Wall WA, Ramm E. Accelerated iterative substructuring schemes for instationary fluid-structure interaction. In: Bathe KJ, editor. Computational fluid and solid mechanics. Elsevier; 2001. p. 1325-8.
33. Morand H, Ohayon R. Interactions fluids-structures. Recherches en Mathématiques Appliquées, vol. 23. Paris: Masson; 1992.
34. Nobile F. Numerical approximation of fluid-structure interaction problems with application to haemodynamics. PhD thesis, EPFL, Switzerland, 2001.
35. Piperno S, Farhat C, Larrouturou B. Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems. Part I: Model problem, theory and two-dimensional application. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engng 1995; 124:79-112.
36. Rivara MC. A 3-D refinement algorithm suitable for adaptive and multi-grid techniques. Commn Appl Numer Meth 1992;8:281-90.
37. Rugonyi S, Bathe KJ. On finite element analysis of fluid flows coupled with structural interaction. CMES - Comp Model Engng Sci 2001;2(2):195-212.
38. Saad Y, Schultz MH. GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Statist Comput 1986;7(3):856-69.
39. Salmon S, Thiriet M, Gerbeau J-F. Medical image-based computational model of pulsatile flow in saccular aneurisms. Math Model Numer Anal 2003;37(4): 631-48.
40. Simo JC, Fox DD, Rifai MS. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model, Part I : Formulation and optimal parametrization. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng 1989;72:267-304.
41. Zhang H, Bathe KJ. Direct and iterative computing of fluid flows fully coupled with structures. In: Bathe KJ, editor. Computational fluid and solid mechanics. Elsevier; 2001. p. 1440-3.