Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with open-angle glaucoma

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 538-541

  De Tarso Pierre Filho, Paulo ^a   Gomes, Paulo R P ^a   Pierre, Érika T L ^a   Pierre, Leandro M ^a  

^a Santa Casa of Sobral ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Learning effect; Matrix; Perimetry; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMPHREY MATRIX PERIMETRY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LEARNING; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; PARAMETER; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VISUAL FIELD; AGED; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADULT; AGED; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SERIAL LEARNING; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77953038000     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067211002000328     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 4787-95. (Pubitemid 37315292)
2. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 77-83. (Pubitemid 43754619)
3. Spry PG, Johnson CA. Within-test variability of frequency-doubling perimetry using 24-2 test pattern. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 315-20.
4. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA, Fingeret M, et al. Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 1540-8. (Pubitemid 41685901)
5. Wild JM, Moss ID. Baseline alterations in blue-on-yellow normal perimetric sensitivity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1996; 234: 141-9.
6. Rossetti L, Fogagnolo P, Miglior S, Centofanti M, Vetrugno M, Orzalesi N. Learning effect of short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 399-404. (Pubitemid 44434993)
7. Bernardi L, Costa VP, Shiroma LO. Flicker perimetry in healthy subjects: influence of age and gender, learning effect and short term fluctuation. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2007; 70: 91-9.
8. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, Farber MD, Ticho U, Blumenthal EZ. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 511-6. (Pubitemid 36015111)
9. Centofanti M, Fogagnolo P, Oddone F, et al. Learning effect of Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 2008; 17: 436-41.
10. Hong S, Na K, Kim CY, Seong GJ. Learning effect of Humphrey matrix perimetry. Can J Ophthalmol 2007; 42: 707-11. (Pubitemid 350157558)
11. Contestabile MT, Perdicchi A, Amodeo S, Recupero V, Recupero SM. The influence of learning effect on frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix). J Glaucoma 2007; 16: 297-301. (Pubitemid 46626055)
12. Artes PH, Hutchinson DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2451-7.
13. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 571-81.
14. Joson PJ, Kamantigue ME, Chen PP. Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 757-60.
15. Iester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, Zingirian M, Traverso CE. Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 130: 160-4.