The influence of learning effect on frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix)

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 297-301

  Teresa, Contestabile Maria ^a   Perdicchi, Andrea ^a,b   Stefano, Amodeo ^a   Vincenzo, Recupero ^a   Recupero, Santi Maria ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling technology; Learning effect; Perimetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

EID: 34247265032     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31803919ed     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Baginski TA, et al. Chronic human glaucoma causes selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:357-363.
2. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR. Retinal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:484-491.
3. Vickers JC, Shumer R, Podos S, et al. Selective vulnerability of neurochemically coded subpopulations of retinal neurons in a monkey model of glaucoma. Brain Res. 1995;680:23-35.
4. Weber AJ, Chen H, Kaufman PL, et al. Effects of elevated IOP on cell size, density and number in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus. ARVO abstracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(4 suppl) 1981;20:204-212.
5. Johnson CA. Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1994;3(suppl)432-444.
6. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-829.
7. Soliman MA, De Jong LA, Ismaeil AA, et al. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:444-454.
8. Iester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, et al. Learning effect, short-term fluctuation and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:160-164.
9. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, et al. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:511-516.
10. Joson PJ, Kamantigue MEG, Chen PP, et al. Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:757-760.
11. Heeg GP, Ponsioen TL, Jansonius NM, et al. Learning effect, normal range, and test-retest variability of frequency doubling perimetry as a function of age, perimetric experience, and the presence or absence of glaucoma. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt. 2003;23:535-540.
12. Brush MB, Chen PP. Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening c-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:551-552.
13. Wood JM, Wild JM, Hussey MK, et al. Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry: evidence for a learning effect. Acta Ophthalmol. 1987;63:326-333.
14. Werner EB, Adelson A, Krupin T, et al. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:764-767.
15. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:81-86.
16. Wild JM, Dengler-Harles M, Searle AET, et al. The influence of learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspected glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 1989;67:537-545.
17. Autzen T, Work K. The effect of learning and age on short-term fluctuation and mean sensitivity of automated static perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol. 1990;68:327-330.
18. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:19-22.
19. Fujimoto N, Minowa K, Miyauchi O, et al. Learning effect for frequency doubling perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:269-270.
20. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. 1999;40:648-656.
21. Matsuo H, Tomita J, Suzuki Y, et al. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:467-473.