Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 436-441

  Centofanti, Marco ^a,b   Fogagnolo, Paolo ^b   Oddone, Francesco ^b   Orzalesi, Nicola ^c   Vetrugno, Michele ^d   Manni, Gianluca ^a,b   Rossetti, Luca ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling technology; Glaucoma; Learning effect; Matrix; Ocular hypertension; Perimetry; Test retest variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; LEARNING; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; STANDARD; TECHNOLOGY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; AGED; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PERIMETRY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 58149107582     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815f531d     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Werner EB, Adelson A, Krupin T. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:764-767.
2. Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, et al. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:206-215.
3. Rossetti L, Fogagnolo P, Miglior S, et al. Learning effect of shortwavelength automated perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:399-404.
4. Brush MB, Chen PP. Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:551-552.
5. Joson PJ, Kamantigue ME, Chen PP. Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:757-760.
6. Khong JJ, Dimitrov PN, Rait J, et al. Can the specificity of the FDT for glaucoma be improved by confirming abnormal results? J Glaucoma. 2001;10:199-202.
7. Fujimoto N, Minowa K, Miyauchi O, et al. Learning effect for frequency doubling perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:269-270.
8. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, et al. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:511-516.
9. Iester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, et al. Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:160-164.
10. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, et al. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perime-try in chronic open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:467-473.
11. Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, et al. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequencydoubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42: 1404-1410.
12. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Patel A, et al. Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:933-938.
13. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, et al. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:351-356.
14. Hong S, Ahn H, Ha SJ, et al. Early glaucoma detection using the Humphrey Matrix perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer photography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:210-215.
15. Contestabile MT, Perdicchi A, Amodeo S, et al. The influence of learning effect on frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix). J Glaucoma. 2007;16:297-301.
16. Miglior S, Rossetti L, Brigatti L, et al. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation by dynamics scanning laser ophthalmo-scopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:16-23.
17. Weinreb RN, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detection of glaucoma with scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116: 1583-1589.
18. Hodapp E, Parrish R II, Anderson D. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1993:11-63.
19. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:571-581.
20. Johnson CA, Gunvant P, Fingeret M, et al. A Primer for Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Using the Humphrey Matrix. Zeiss: Welch-Allyn; 2004.
21. Delgado MF, Nguyen NT, Cox TA, et al. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:2362-2374.