Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix perimetry

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 707-711

  Hong, Samin ^a   Na, Kyungdoo ^a   Chan, Yun Kim ^a   Gong, Je Seong ^a,b  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling technology; Glaucoma; Humphrey Matrix perimetry; Perimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LEARNING; PERIMETRY; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 36348994764     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3129/I07-135     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:389-93.
2. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, et al. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:1102-10.
3. Reus NJ, Colen TP, Lemij HG. Visualization of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects with the GDx with individualized and with fixed compensation of anterior segment birefringence. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1512-6.
4. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Association between scanning laser polarimetry measurements using variable corneal polarization compensation and visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:961-6.
5. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser Polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:827-37.
6. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, McSoley J, Katz J. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmohgy 2005;112:3-9.
7. Hong S, Ahn H, Ha SJ, Yeom HY, Seong GJ, Hong YJ. Early glaucoma detection using the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer photography. Ophthalmology 2007;114:210-5.
8. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am 1966;56:1628-33.
9. Kelly DH. Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am 1981;71:1051-5.
10. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, Welsh AH, James AC. Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res 1999;39:4258-73.
11. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:398-401.
12. White AJ, Sun H, Swanson WH, Lee BB. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3590-9.
13. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. J Glaucoma 2006;15:77-83.
14. Kogure S, Toda Y, Tsukahara S. Prediction of future scotoma on conventional automated static perimetry using frequency doubling technology perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:347-52.
15. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, et al. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4787-95.
16. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108:130-5.
17. Werner EB, Krupin T, Adelson A, et al. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients. Ophthalmology 1990;97:44-8.
18. Fujimoto N, Minowa K, Miyauchi O, et al. Learning effect for frequency doubling perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:269-70.
19. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, et al. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002;11:467-73.
20. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, et al. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma 2002;11:511-6.
21. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:648-56.
22. Anderson DR. Automated Static Perimetry. St Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1992:123.
23. Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993.
24. Wild JM, Moss ID. Baseline alterations in blue-on-yellow normal perimetric sensitivity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1996;234:141-9.