The BI-RADS Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lexicon

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 171-185

  Molleran, Virginia ^a   Mahoney, Mary C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Focus; Lexicon; Mass; MRI; Non masslike enhancement

Indexed keywords

TAMOXIFEN;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; NOMENCLATURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 77952997557     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.001     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Turkbey B., Kobayashi H., Ogawa M., et al. Imaging of tumor angiogenesis: functional or targeted. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 193:304-313.
2. Papetti M., Herman I.M. Mechanisms of normal and tumor derived angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002, 282:947-970.
3. Kuhl C.K. Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast MRI: diagnosis and intervention 2005, Liberman and Morris, New York, 7. p. 79-139.
4. Morris E.A. Breast MR imaging lexicon updated. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006, 14(3):293-303.
5. Wang L.C., Demartini W.B., Partridge S.C., et al. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:826-831.
6. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama A., et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996, 200:639-649.
7. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging; a signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 1999, 211:101-110.
8. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006, 238:42-53.
9. Macure K.J., Ouwerkerk R., Jacobs M.A., et al. Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 2006, 26:1719-1734.
10. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging Part I. choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007, 244:356-378.
11. Morris E.A. The normal breast. Breast MRI: diagnosis and intervention 2005, Liberman and Morris, New York, 4. p. 23-44.
12. Kuhl C.K., Bieling H.B., Gieseke J., et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 1997, 203:137.
13. Talele A.C., Slanetz P.J., Edmister W.B., et al. The lactating breast: MRI findings and literature review. Breast J 2003, 9(3):237-240.
14. Delille J.P., Slanetz J.S., Yeh E.D., et al. Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: breast tissue perfusion determined with MR imaging - initial observations. Radiology 2005, 235:36-41.
15. Espinosa L.A., Daniel B.L., Vidarsson L., et al. The lactating breast: contrast-enhanced MR imaging of normal tissue and cancer. Radiology 2005, 237:429-436.
16. Heinig A., Lampe D., Kolbi H., et al. Suppression of unspecific enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by antiestrogen medication. Tumori 2002, 88(3):215-223.
17. Morakkabati N., Leutner C.C., Schmiedel A., et al. Breast MR imaging during or soon after radiation therapy. Radiology 2003, 229:893-901.
18. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Orel S.G. Update of breast MR interpretation model. Radiology 2001, 219:484-494.
19. Hochman M.G., Orel S.G., Powell C.M., et al. Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1997, 204:123.
20. Erguvan-Dogan B., Whitman G.J., Kushwaha A.C., et al. Bi-RADS-MRI: a primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187:W152-W160.
21. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Lee M.J., et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging; features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002, 179:171-178.
22. Bartella L., Liberman L., Morris E.A., et al. Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:865-870.
23. Gutierrez R.L., DeMartini W.B., Eby P.R., et al. Bi-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:994-1000.
24. Liberman L., Mason G., Morris E.A., et al. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:426-430.
25. Eby P.R., DeMartini W.B., Gutierrez R.L., et al. Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:861-867.
26. Ikeda D.M., Hylton N.M., Kuhl C.K. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BiRADS: magnetic resonance imaging 2003, ACR, Reston (VA).
27. Jansen S.A., Newstead G.M., Abe H., et al. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristic compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology 2007, 245(3):684-691.
28. Kuhl C.K. Concepts for differential diagnosis in breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006, 14(3):305-337.
29. Qayyum A., Birdwell R.L., Daniel B.L., et al. MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002, 178:1227-1232.
30. Yeh E.D., Slanetz P.J., Edmister W.B., et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: spectrum of enhancement and morphology on magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 2003, 9:13-18.
31. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Dershaw D.D., et al. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003, 181:519-525.
32. Morakkabati-Spitz N., Leutner C., Schild H. Diagnostic usefulness of linear and segmental enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2005, 14:2010-2017.
33. Rosen E.L., Smith-Foley S.A., DeMartini W.B., et al. Bi-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 2007, 13(6):545-555.
34. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Benton C.L., et al. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women. Cancer 2003, 98(2):377-388.