Breast MR Imaging during or Soon after Radiation Therapy

Radiology

Volumn 229, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 893-901

  Morakkabati, Nuschin ^a   Leutner, Claudia C ^a   Schmiedel, Alexandra ^a   Schild, Hans H ^a   Kuhl, Christiane Katharina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, therapeutic radiology; Breast, MR; Radiations, injurious effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; XEROMAMMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0344153003     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2293020167     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, Moe RE, White E. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the '90 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast cancer. Cancer 1999; 86:628-637.
2. Wazer DE. Contemporary issues in the use of radiation therapy for early invasive breast cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2000; 9:585-601.
3. Dershaw DD. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:309-316.
4. Neff PT, Bear HD, Pierce CV, et al. Long-term results of breast conserving therapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 709-717.
5. Giess SC, Keating DM, Osborne MP, Rosenblatt R. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings. Radiology 1999; 212:829-835.
6. Voogd AC, van Tiehoven G, Peterse HL, et al. Local recurrence after breast conservation therapy for early stage breast carcinoma: detection, treatment, and outcome in 266 patients. Dutch Study Group on local recurrence after breast conservation (BORST). Cancer 1999; 85:437-466.
7. Hiettaner P, Miettinen M, Makinen J. Survival after first recurrence in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1986; 22: 913-919.
8. Nomura Y, Tsutsui S, Murakami S, Takenaka Y. Prognostic impact of second cancer on the survival of early breast cancer patients. Int J Oncol 1999; 14:1103-1109.
9. Murray AD, Redpath TW, Neddham G, Gilbert FJ, Brookes JA, Eremin O. Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography of both breasts following local excision and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:594-600.
10. Dao TH, Rahmouni A, Campana F. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 751:187.
11. Harms SE. Integration of breast magnetic resonance imaging with breast cancer treatment. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 9:79-91.
12. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schlegel A, Beck R, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:891-900.
13. Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Kopka L, Kahlen O, Grabbe E. Kontrastmittelgestützte dynamische MR-Mammographie nach diagnostischen und therapeutischen Eingriffen an der Mamma. Bildgebung 1996; 63:94-100.
14. Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:965-974.
15. Kuhl CK, Elevelt A, Leutner C, Gieseke J, Pakose E, Schild HH. Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. Radiology 1997; 204:667-675.
16. Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology 2001; 220:31-39.
17. Kuhl CK, Mielcarek P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110.
18. Kuhl CK, Klaschik S, Mielcarek P, Gieseke J, Wardelmann E, Shild HH. Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:187-196.
19. Kuhl CK. MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:46-58.
20. Dershaw DD, Mc Cormick B, Osborne MP. Detection of local recurrence after conservative therapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 1992; 70:493-496.
21. Stomper PC, Recht A, Berenberg AL. Mammographic detection of recurrent cancer in the irradiated breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148:39-43.
22. Fowble B, Solin LJ, Schultz DJ. Breast recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation: patterns of failure, prognosis and pathologic findings from mastectomy specimens with implications for treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 19:833-342.
23. Hassel BR, Olivotto IA. Early breast cancer: detection of recurrency after conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Radiology 1990; 176:731-735.
24. Locker AP, Hanely P, Wilson AR. Mammography in the preoperative assessment and postoperative surveillance of patients treated by excision and radiotherapy for primary breast cancer. Clin Radiol 1990; 41:388-391.
25. Drew PJ, Kerin MJ, Turnbull LW, et al. Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5:265-270.
26. Whitehouse GH, Moore NR. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1994; 2:591.
27. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Hilbertz T, Beck R. Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with postoperative scarring and silicone implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14:348.
28. Gilles R, Guinebretičre JM, Shapeero LG, et al. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology 1993; 188:473.
29. Mumtaz H, Davidson T, Hall-Craggs MA, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional triple assessment in locally residual or residual or recurrent breast cancer. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1147-1151.
30. Friedrich M. MRI of the breast: state of the art. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:707-725.
31. Rieber A, Zeitler H, Rosenthal H, et al. MRI of breast cancer: influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity. BR J Radiol 1997; 70:452-458.
32. Gallardo X, Sentis M, Castaner E, Andreu X, Darell A, Canalias J. Enhancement of intramammary lymph nodes with lymphoid hyperplasia: a potential pitfall in breast MRI. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:1662-1665.
33. Brinck U, Fischer U, Korabiowska M, Jutrowski M, Schauer A, Grabbe E. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrastenhanced dynamic MR-mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1331-1334.
34. Kurtz B, Achten C, Audretsch W, Rezai M, Zocholl G. MR-Mammographie der Fettgewebsnekrose. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1996; 165: 359-363.
35. Fischer U, v Heyden U, Vosshenrich R. Signalverhalten maligner und benigner Läsionen in der dynamischen 2-D-MRT der Mamma. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1993; 158:287.
36. Orel SG, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Fraker DL, Sullivan DC. Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy. Radiology 1997; 205:429-436.
37. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213: 881-888.
38. Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Probst A, Burchhardt A, Grabbe E. Präoperative MR-Mammographie bei bekanntem Mammakarzinom. Sinnvolle Mehrinformation oder sinnloser Mehraufwand? Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1994; 161:300.