Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 186, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 865-870

  Bartella, Lia ^a   Liberman, Laura ^a   Morris, Elizabeth A ^a   Dershaw, D David ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OCCULT CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCREENING TEST; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33645818360     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1777     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001; 220:13-30
2. Morris EA. Review of breast MRI: indications and limitations. In: Miller WT, Berg WA, eds. Seminars in roentgenology, vol. 36: breast imaging. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2001:226-237
3. Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, et al. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR 2003; 181:619-626
4. Morris EA. Illustrated breast MR lexicon. In: Miller WT, Berg WA, eds. Seminars in roentgenology, vol. 36: breast imaging. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2001:238-249
5. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS Atlas, 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
6. Schnall MD, Ikeda DM. Lesion Diagnosis Working Group report. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:982-990
7. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110
8. Orel SG. Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? Radiology 1999; 211:5-7
9. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR 2000; 175:35-43
10. Martin JE, Gallager HS. Mammographic diagnosis of minimal breast cancer. Cancer 1971; 28:1519-1526
11. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected by MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR 2002; 179:171-178
12. Kuhl CK, Klaschik S, Mielcareck P, Gieseke J, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:187-196
13. Ho LWC, Wong KP, Chan JHM, et al. MR appearance of metastatic melanotic melanoma in the breast. Clin Radiol 2000; 55:572-573
14. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Correlation of lesion appearance and histologic findings for the nodes of a breast MR imaging interpretation model. RadioGraphics 1999; 19:79-92
15. Panizza P, De Gaspari A, Vanzulli A, et al. Accuracy of post-MR imaging second-look sonography in previously undetected breast lesions. (abstr) Radiology 1997; 205(P):489
16. Dhamanaskar KP, Muradall D, Kulkarni SR, et al. MRI-directed ultrasound: a cost effective method for diagnosis and intervention in breast imaging. (abstr) Radiology 2002; 225(P):653
17. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 2003; 227:856-861