Valuing environmental goods and services derived from the forests

Journal of Forest Economics

Volumn 15, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 1-14

  Stenger, Anne ^a,b   Harou, Patrice ^b   Navrud, Ståle ^c  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Environmental valuation; Forest resources

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; PLANNING; RESOURCE VALUATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DECISION MAKING PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION; FOREST ECONOMICS; FOREST RESOURCES; FOREST VALUATIONS; FORESTRY SECTOR; VALUE TRANSFERS;

DECISION MAKING;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; DATABASE; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FOREST RESOURCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DATA BASES; FORESTS; NATURAL RESOURCES;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; LORRAINE; MEURTHE ET MOSELLE; NANCY; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 57749182880     PISSN: 11046899     EISSN: 16181530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barbier E.B., and Heal G.M. Valuing ecosystem services. The Economists' Voice 3 3 (2006)
2. Bishop, J.T. (Ed.), 1999. Valuing Forests: A Review of Methods and Applications in Developing Countries. 〈http://web.worldbank.org/servlets/ECR?contentMDK=20486370&site PK=407255〉.
3. Boman, M., 2008. To pay or not to pay for biodiversity in forests - what scale determines responses to willingness to pay questions with uncertain response options? Special issue, forthcoming.
4. Carson R.T., Flores N.E., and Mitchell R.C. The theory and measurement of passive use value. In: Bateman I.J., and Willis K.G. (Eds). Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the USA, EC, and Developing Countries (1999), Oxford University Press, New York 97-130
5. Carson R.T., Flores N.E., and Meade N.F. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (2001) 173-210
6. Ciracy-Wantrup S.V. Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies (1962), University of California, Berkeley
7. Clawson A., and Knetsch M. The Economics of Outdoor Recreation (1966), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 348pp
8. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Naeem S., Limburg K., Paruelo J., O'Neill R.V., Raskin R., Sutton P., and Van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (1997) 253-260
9. Després, A., Normandin, D., 1996. Les services d'environnement fournis parla forêt: problèmes d'évaluation et de régulation, Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, nø 41 "Questions d'économie forestière", pp. 61-91.
10. Elsasser, P., Meyerhoff, J., Montagné, C., Stenger, A., 2008. A bibliography and database on forest benefit valuation studies from Austria, France, Germany and Switzerland - a possible base for a concerted European approach. Special issue, forthcoming.
11. Forestry Commission, 2000. Non-market benefits of forestry. Report to the FC by Willis, K. et al. University of Newcastle, UK.
12. Garcia, S., Harou, P., Montagné, C., Stenger, A., 2008. Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: application to forest biodiversity. Special issue, forthcoming.
13. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., and Boumans R.M.J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41 (2002) 393-408
14. Harou, P.A., 1987. Essays in Forest Economics: Appraisal and Evaluation of Forestry Investments, Programs and Policies. Vauk, Kiel, Germany, 195pp.
15. Hartman R. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Economic Inquiry 14 (1976) 52-58
16. Holmes T.P., and Boyle K.J. Stated preference methods for valuation of forest attributes. In: Sills E.O., and Abt K.L. (Eds). Forests in a Market Economy (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 321-340
17. Hörnsten L., and Fredman P. On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning 51 (2000) 1-10
18. Hougner C., Colding J., and Söderqvist T. Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden. Ecological Economics 59 (2006) 364-374
19. Hotelling, 1949. Letter to the National Park Service, An Economic Study of the Monetary Valuation of Recreation in the National Parks. US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
20. Kopp R. Existence values should be used in cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11 1 (1992) 123-125
21. Krieger D.J. Economic Value of Forest Ecosystem Services: A Review (2001), The Wilderness Society, Washington, DC, USA 31pp
22. Kriström, 2006. State-of-the-art valuation and forestry resources. In: A Protocol and Database for the Environmental Valuation of French/European Forests. Cost E45. September 26-27, 2006. Nancy, France.
23. Krutilla J. Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review 57 (1967) 777-786
24. Leon-Gonzales, R., Scarpa, R., 2006. Robust benefit function transfer: a Bayesian model averaging approach. In: A Protocol and Database for the Environmental Valuation of French/European Forests. Cost E45. September 26-27, 2006. Nancy, France.
25. Lindhjem H. Non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: a meta-analysis. Journal of Forest Economics 12 (2007) 251-277
26. Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., 2008. How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfer? Ecological Economics, forthcoming.
27. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., and Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Markandya A., Harou P.A., Bellu L., and Cistulli V. Environmental Economics for Sustainable Growth - A Handbook for Practitioners (2002), Elgar Publisher, UK 567pp
29. Matthews, D.I., Hutchinson, W.G., Scarpa, R., 2008. Testing the stability of the benefit transfer function for discrete choice contingent valuation data. Special issue, forthcoming.
30. Meyerhoff, J., Liebe, U., Hartje, V., 2008. Benefits of biodiversity enhancement due to nature-oriented silviculture: evidence from two choice experiments in Germany. Special issue, forthcoming.
31. Montagné, C., Stenger, A., 2006. Valuing forest ecosystem services in France: State and Stakes - overview of French Forest. Contribution Report to Cost E 45, 17pp.
32. Navrud, S., 2006. Database and benefit transfer protocol for forest environmental valuation. In: Proceedings from a Protocol and Database for the Environmental Valuation of French/European Forests. September 26-27, 2006. Nancy, France. Laboratory of Forest Economics (LEF), UMR INRA/ENGREF and COST E-45: Euroforex. Available at: 〈http://lef.nancy-engref.inra.fr/Docs/workshop200609/Nancy200609.pd f〉.
33. In: Navrud S., and Ready R. (Eds). Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods (2007), Springer, Dordrect, The Netherlands
34. Pearce D.W. The economic value of forest ecosystems. Ecosystem Health 7 4 (2001) 284-296
35. Pearce, D.W., Pearce, C.G.T., 2001. The Value of Forest Ecosystems. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. CDB Technical Series No. 4. Quebec, Canada. 67pp.
36. Peyron, J.-L., Harou, P., Niedzwiedz, A., Stenger, A., 2002. A national survey on demand for recreation in French forests. Report for EUROSTAT, Nancy, France, 44pp.
37. Quiggin J. Existence values and benefit cost analysis: a third view. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12 1 (1993) 195-199
38. Ready R., and Navrud S. International benefits transfer: methods and validity tests. Ecological Economics 60 2 (2006) 429-434
39. Rosenthal D., and Nelson R. Why existence values should not be used in cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11 1 (1992) 18116-18122
40. Söderqvist, T., Soutukorva, A., 2008. On how to assess the quality of environmental valuation studies. Special issue, forthcoming.
41. Veisten K., and Navrud S. Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: assessing the effect of an induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats. Applied Economics 38 (2006) 735-756
42. Welsh M.P., and Poe G.L. Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (1998) 170-185
43. Zandersen, M., Tol, R.S.J., 2008. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. Special issue, forthcoming.