Social indicators of multifunctional rural land use: The case of forestry in the UK

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 31-40

  Slee, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLOUCESTERSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Forestry; Indicators; Multifunctionality; Social; UK

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; RURAL AREA; SOCIAL INDICATOR; SUSTAINABILITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33846486232     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.034     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Australian Bureau of Agricultural Resource Economics (ABARE). Multifunctionality: A Pretext for Protection, current issues vol. 3 (1999), ABARE pp. 1-6
2. Behan R.W. Multi-resource forest management: a paradigmatic challenge to professional forestry. J. Forest. 88 (1990) 12-18
3. Bishop K., Kitchen L., Marsden T., and Milbourne P. Forestry, community and land in South Wales valleys. In: O'Brien L., and Claridge J. (Eds). Trees are Company: Social Science Research into Woodlands and the Natural Environment (2002), Forestry Commission, Edinburgh 29-38. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/PDF/treesarecompany.pdf/$FILE/treesarecompany.pdf http://www.forestry.gov.uk/PDF/treesarecompany.pdf/$FILE/treesarecompany.pdf (September 12, 2006)
4. Brainard J., Lovett A., and Bateman I. Integrating geographical information systems into travel cost analysis and benefit transfer. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Sci. 13 3 (1999) 227-246
5. Brown G., and Reed P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For. Sci. 46 2 (2000) 240-247
6. Buttoud G. How can policy take into consideration the "full value" of forests?. Land Use Policy 17 (2000) 169-175
7. In: Carney D. (Ed). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What Contribution can we make? (1998), DFID, London
8. CJC Consulting, Pearce, D., Willis, K., 2003. Economic analysis of forestry policy in England, A Report to DEFRA and the Treasury.
9. Daly H.E., and Cobb J. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy towards Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future (1989), Beacon Press, Boston
10. DEFRA. Rural Strategy 2004 (2004), DEFRA, London
11. Department of Education and Science. Report of the Land Use Study Group (1967), HMSO, London
12. Dickie, I., Rayment, M., 2001. Assessing the economic benefits of forestry in the UK. Paper prepared for the Forestry Commission's Advisory Panel, Environment Sub-Committee.
13. Edlin H. Woodland Crafts in Britain (1949), Batsford, London
14. Elands, B., Wiersum, F., 2003. Forestry and rural development in Europe, Forest and Nature Conservation Group, Report 2003-02, Wageningen UR, The Netherlands.
15. Forest Authority. The UK Forestry Standard: The Government's Approach to Sustainable Forestry (1998), Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
16. Forestry Commission. England Forestry Strategy: A New Focus for England's Woodlands (1998), Forestry Commission, Cambridge
17. Forestry Commission. UK Indicators of Sustainable Forestry (2002), Forestry Commission and Forest Service for Northern Ireland, Economics and Statistics Branch, Edinburgh
18. Giddens A. Sociology: A Brief but Critical Introduction (1982), Macmillan, London
19. HM Treasury. Forestry in Great Britain: An Interdepartmental Cost Benefit Analysis (1972), HMSO, London
20. Inglis, A.S., Guy, S., 1997. Rural development forestry in Scotland: the struggle to bring international principles and best practices to the last bastion of British colonial forestry. ODI Rural Development Forestry Network Paper No. 20b. Overseas Development Institute, London.
21. Jackson J.E., Lee R.E., and Sommers P. Monitoring the community impacts of the Northwest Forest Plan: an alternative to social indicators. Soc. Nat. Resour. 17 (2004) 223-233
22. Kenyon W., and Nevin C. The use of economic and participatory approaches to assess forest development; a case study of the Ettrick valley. For. Policy Econ. 3 (2001) 69-80
23. Kennedy J.J., and Koch N.E. Viewing and managing natural resources as human-ecosystem relationships. For. Policy Econ. 6 (2004) 497-504
24. Kirby, K.J., Smart, S.M., Black, H.I.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Corney, P.M., Smithers, R.J., 2005. Long-term ecological change in British woodland (1971-2001), a resurvey and analysis of change based on 103 sites in the Nature Conservancy 'Bunce 1971' woodland survey, English Nature, Perth.
25. Koch N.E., and Kennedy J.J. Multiple use forestry for social values. AMBIO 20 7 (1991) 330-333
26. Kusel J. Assessing well-being in forest-dependent communities. J. Sustain. Forest. 13 1/2 (2001) 359-384
27. Lawrence A. Social values of forests. In: Burley J., Evans J., and Youngquist J.A. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences (2004), Elsevier, Amsterdam 1126-1131
28. Munday, M., Roberts, A., Christie, M., Midmore, P., 2002. Developing an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare in Wales. Final Report for the Countryside Council for Wales.
29. National Audit Office. Review of the Forestry Commission's objectives and achievement. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (1986), HMSO, London
30. Natural Resources (Technical) Committee. Forestry Agriculture and Marginal Land (1957), HMSO, London
31. O'Brien E.A. Human values and their importance to the development of forestry policy in Britain: a review. Forestry 76 (2003) 5-17
32. Parkins J.R., Stedman R.C., and Varghese J. Moving towards local level indicators of sustainability in forest based communities: a mixed methods approach. Soc. Indicat. Res. 56 (2001) 43-72
33. Ryle G. Forest Service: the First Forty-five years of the Forestry Commission in Great Britain (1969), David and Charles, Newton Abbot
34. Sagoff M. The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law and the Environment (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Slee B., Evans R., and Roberts D. Forestry in the rural economy: a new approach to assessing the impact of forestry on rural development. Forestry 77 5 (2004) 441-453
36. Slee, B., Selman, P., Ingram, J., Taylor, D., 2003. Heartwoods: interim evaluation. Unpublished Report to the Forestry Commission.
37. Slee, B., 2005. A generic framework to support the evaluation of rural development forestry projects. A Draft Report to the Forestry Commission.
38. Slee R.W. From countrysides of production to countrysides of consumption?. J. Agric. Sci. 143 (2005) 1-11 (Centenary Review)
39. Tomkins S. Forestry in Crisis: The Battle for the Hills (1989), Croom Helm, London
40. Van der Ploeg J.D., and Renting H. Impact and potential: a comparative review of European rural development practices. Sociol. Rural. 40 4 (2000) 529-543
41. In: van Huylenbroek G., and Durand G. (Eds). Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development (2003), Ashgate, Aldershot
42. Willis, K., Garrod, G., Scarpa, R., Powe, N., Lovett, A., Bateman, I., Hanley, N., Macmillan, D., 2003. The Social and Economic Benefits of Forests in Great Britain. University of Newcastle, CREAM. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/website/PDF.nsf/pdf/sebreport0703.pdf/$FILE/sebreport0703.pdf (September 12, 2006).