Mismatch negativity effects of alternating vowels in morphologically complex word forms

Journal of Neurolinguistics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 383-399

  Scharinger, Mathias ^a,b   Lahiri, Aditi ^b,c   Eulitz, Carsten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ERPs; Lexical access; Mismatch negativity; Morphological processing; Underspecified representations; Vowel alternations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PHONATION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; VOWEL; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 77952885430     PISSN: 09116044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anderson S.R. Where's morphology?. Linguistic Inquiry 1982, 13:571-612.
2. Anderson S.R. A-morphous morphology 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Baayen H., Dijkstra T., Schreuder R. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:94-117.
4. Baayen H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database [CD-Rom] 1995, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
5. Berg P., Scherg M. A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994, 90:229-241.
6. Boersma P., Weenink D. PRAAT: doing phonetics by computer (ver. 4.6.38) 2007, Institut for Phonetic Sciences, Amsterdam.
7. Bonte M.L., Mitterer H., Zellagui N., Poelmans H., Blomert L. Auditory cortical tuning to statistical regularities in phonology. Clinical Neurophysiology 2005, 116:2765-2774.
8. Chomsky N. Studies on semantics in generative grammar 1972, Vol. 107. Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague.
9. Clahsen H. Linguistic perspectives on morphological processing. Advances in the theory of the lexicon 2006, 355-388. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. D. Wunderlich (Ed.).
10. Clahsen H., Eisenbeiss S., Hadler M., Sonnenstuhl I. The mental representation of inflected words: an experimental study of adjectives and verbs in German. Language 2001, 77(3):510-543.
11. Clahsen H., Eisenbeiss S., Sonnenstuhl-Henning I. Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics 1997, 23:201-249.
12. Compumedics NeuroScan ACQUIRE (Version 4.2) 2004, El Paso, TX.
13. Cooper N., Cutler A., Wales R.J. Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and nonnative listeners. Language and Speech 2002, 45:207-228.
14. Cutler A., van Donselaar W.D. Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech 2001, 44:171-195.
15. Czigler I., Winkler I. Preattentive auditory change detection relies on unitary sensory memory representations. NeuroReport 1996, 7:2413-2417.
16. Eulitz C., Lahiri A. Neurobiological evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(4):577-583.
17. Frauenfelder U., Schreuder R. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: the role of productivity. Yearbook of morphology 1992, 165-183. Kluwer, Dordrecht. G. Booij, J. van Marle (Eds.).
18. Friedrich C., Kotz S.A., Friederici A.D., Gunter T.C. ERPs reflect lexical identification in word fragment priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:541-552.
19. Imada T., Watanabe M., Mashiko T., Kawakatsu M., Kotani M. The silent period between sounds has a stronger effect than the interstimulus interval on auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1997, 102:37-45.
20. Jackendoff R.S. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 1975, 51:639-671.
21. Lahiri A., Marslen-Wilson W.D. The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition 1991, 38:245-294.
22. Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002a). Processing and representation of umlauted vowels. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, San Francisco.
23. Lahiri A., Reetz H. Underspecified recognition. Laboratory phonology VII 2002, 637-677. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. C. Gussenhoven, N. Warner (Eds.).
24. Marslen-Wilson W. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives 1990, 148-172. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. G. Altmann (Ed.).
25. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 1994, 101:3-33.
26. Marslen-Wilson W., Zhou X. Abstractness, allomorphy, and lexical architecture. Language and Cognitive Processes 1999, 14:321-352.
27. MEGIS. (2004). BESA: Brain Electrical Source Analysis (Version 5.1). Gräfelfing.
28. Menning H., Zwitserlood P., Schöning S., Hihn H., Bölte J., Dobel C., et al. Pre-attentive detection of syntactic and semantic errors. Neuroreport 2005, 16(1):77-80.
29. Näätänen R. Attention and brain function 1992, Erlbaum, New York.
30. Näätänen R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology 2001, 38:1-21.
31. Näätänen R., Alho K. Mismatch negativity (MMN) - the measure for central sound representation accuracy. Audiology and Neurotology 1997, 2:341-353.
32. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118(12):2544-2590.
33. Neurobehavioural Systems Presentation (Version 0.51) 2002, Albany, CA.
34. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
35. Pettigrew C.M., Murdoch B.E., Chenery H.J., Kei J. The relationship between the mismatch negativity (MMN) and psycholinguistic models of spoken word processing. Aphasiology 2004, 18(1):3-28.
36. Phillips C., Pellathy T., Marantz A., Yellin E., Wexler K., Poeppel D., et al. Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: an MEG mismatch study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:1038-1105.
37. Pinker S. Rules of language. Science 1991, 253:530-535.
38. Pinker S. Words and rules. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 1998, 106:219-242.
39. Pinker S., Prasada S. Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993, 1(8):1-56.
40. Pinker S., Prince A. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. The reality of linguistic rules 1994, 321-352. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan, G.K. Iverson (Eds.).
41. Polka L., Bohn O.-S. Asymmetries in vowel perception. Speech Communication 2003, 41:221-231.
42. Pulleyblank D. Underspecification and low vowel harmony in Okpe. Studies in African Linguistics 1986, 17:119-153.
43. Pulleyblank D. Vocalic underspecification in Yoruba. Linguistic Inquiry 1988, 19:233-270.
44. Pulvermüller F., Kujala T., Shtyrov Y., Simola J., Tiitinen H., Alku P., et al. Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage 2001, 14:607-616.
45. Pulvermüller F., Shtyrov Y. Language outside the focus of attention: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Progress in Neurobiology 2006, 79:49-71.
46. Scharinger M. Minimal representations of alternating vowels. Lingua 2009, 119:1414-1425.
47. Schreuder R., Baayen H. Modeling morphological processing. Morphological aspects of language processing 1995, 131-154. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L.B. Feldman (Ed.).
48. Schreuder R., Baayen H. How complex simplex word can be. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37(1):118-139.
49. Shtyrov Y., Pulvermüller F. Memory traces for inflectional affixes as shown by mismatch negativity. European Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 15:1085-1091.
50. Shtyrov Y., Pulvermüller F. Neurophysiological evidence of memory traces for words in the human brain. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology 2002, 13(4):521-526.
51. Smolka E., Zwitserlood P., Rösler F. Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory & Language 2007, 57(3):325-347.
52. Sonnenstuhl I., Eisenbeiss S., Clahsen H. Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition 1999, 72:203-236.
53. Soto-Faraco S., Sebastián-Gallés N., Cutler A. Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 45:412-432.
54. Spinelli E., Segui J., Radeau M. Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001, 16:367-392.
55. Stanners R.F., Neiser J.J., Hernon W.P., Hall R. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18(4):399-412.
56. Wiese R. Phonologie und Morphologie des Umlauts im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 1987, 6:227-248.
57. Wiese R. Phonological versus morphological rules: on German umlaut and ablaut. Journal of Linguistics 1996, 32(1):113-135.
58. Wiese R. The phonology of German 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
59. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 21(3-4):147-163.
60. Winkler I., Czigler I., Jaramillo M., Paavilainen P. Temporal constraints of auditory event synthesis: evidence from ERPs. NeuroReport 1998, 9(3):495-499.
61. Winkler I., Kujala T., Tiitinen H., Sivonen P., Alku P., Lehtokoski A. Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology 1999, 36:638-642.
62. Wurzel W.U. Was bezeichnet der Umlaut im Deutschen?. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 1984, 37(6):647-663.
63. Wurzel W.U. Derivation, Flexion und Blockierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 1988, 41(2):179-198.