The mental representation of inflected words: An experimental study of adjectives and verbs in German

Language

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 510-543

  Clahsen, Harald ^a   Eisenbeiss, Sonja ^b   Hadler, Meike ^b   Sonnenstuhl, Ingrid ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040160729     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2001.0140     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. ANDERSON, STEPHEN R. 1982. Where's morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 13.571-612.
2. ANDERSON, STEPHEN R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. ARCHANGELI, DIANA. 1988. Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5.183-207.
4. ARONOFF, MARK. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. ARONOFF, MARK. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. BAAYEN, HARALD; RICHARD PIEPENBROCK; and H. VAN RIJN. 1993. The CELEX lexical database (CD ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
7. BALOTA, DAVID A. 1994. Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. Handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. by Morton Ann Gernsbacher, 303-49. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. BAUMANN, HERBERT; JOHN NAGENGAST; and G. KLAAS. 1993. New experimental setup (NESU). Nijmegen: MPI für Psycholinguistik, MS.
9. BIERWISCH, MANFRED. 1967. Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German. To honor Roman Jakobson, 239-270. The Hague: Mouton.
10. BLEVINS, JAMES P. 1995. Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition. Linguistics and Philosophy 18.113-52.
11. BLEVINS, JAMES P. 2000. Markedness and blocking in German declensional paradigms. Lexicon in focus, ed. by Barbara Stiebels and Dieter Wunderlich, 83-103. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
12. BYBEE, JOAN L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. BYBEE, JOAN L. 1991. Natural morphology: The organization of paradigms and language acquisition. Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories, ed. by Thom Huebner and Charles A. Ferguson, 67-92. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
14. BYBEE, JOAN L. 1995a. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10.425-55.
15. BYBEE, JOAN L. 1995b. Diachronie and typological properties of morphology and their implications for representation. Morphological aspects of language processing, ed. by Laurie B. Feldman, 225-46. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. CAHILL, LYNNE, and GERALD GAZDAR. 1997. The inflectional phonology of German adjectives, determiners and pronouns. Linguistics 35.211-45.
17. CARSTAIRS, ANDREW. 1987. Allomorphy in inflexion. London: Croom Helm.
18. CHOMSKY, NOAM. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum, 184-221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
19. CLAHSEN, HARALD. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multi-disciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 991-1060.
20. CLAHSEN, HARALD; SONIA EISENBEISS; and INGRID SONNENSTUHL. 1997. Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics 23.201-49.
21. CORBETT, GREVILLE G., and NORMAN M. FRÄSER. 1993. Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29.113-42.
22. ELMAN, JEFFREY L.; ELIZABETH A. BATES; MARK H. JOHNSON; ANNETTE KARMILOFF-SMITH; DOMENICO PARISI; and KIM PLUNKETT. 1996. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. EVANS, ROGER, and GERALD GAZDAR. 1996. DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22.167-216.
24. FELDMAN, LAURIE B., and CAROL A. FOWLER. 1987. The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure. Memory and Cognition 15.1-12.
25. FOWLER, CAROL A.; SHIRLEY E. NAPPS; and LAURIE B. FELDMAN. 1985. Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition 13.241-55.
26. FRAUENFELDER, ULI H., and ROBERT SCHREUDER. 1992. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991.165-83.
27. GÜNTHER, HARTMUT. 1988. Oblique word forms in visual word recognition. Linguistics 26. 583-600.
28. HALLE, MORRIS, and ALEC P. MARANTZ. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. The view from building 20, ed. by Kenneth L. Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, 111-76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51.639-71.
30. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. KEMPLEY, S. T., and JOHN MORTON. 1982. The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology 73.441-54.
32. KIPARSKY, PAUL. 1982. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. The structure of phonological representations, ed. by Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith, Part 1, 131-75. Dordrecht: Foris.
33. KIPARSKY, PAUL. 1998. Paradigm effects and opacity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, MS.
34. KÖPCKE, KLAUS-MICHAEL. 1993. Schemata bei der Pluralbildung des Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.
35. KÖPCKE, KLAUS-MICHAEL. 1998. The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: Schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language 25.293-319.
36. LAHIRI, ADITI, and WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON. 1991. The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition 38.245-94.
37. LAUDANNA, ALESSANDRO, and CRISTINA BURANI. 1985. Address mechanisms to decomposed lexical entries. Linguistics 23.775-92.
38. LAUDANNA, ALESSANDRO, and CRISTINA BURANI. 1995. Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. Morphological aspects of language processing, ed. by Laurie B. Feldman, 345-64. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. LIEBER, ROCHELLE. 1992. Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. LUKÁCS, ÁGNES, and CSABA PLÉH. 1999. Hungarian cross-modal priming and treatment of nonsense words supports the dual-process hypothesis. (Commentary on Clahsen 1999) Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.1030-31.
41. LUKATELA, GEORGIJE; CLAUDIA CARELLO; and MICHAEL T. TURVEY. 1987. Lexical representation of regular and irregular inflected nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes 2.1-17.
42. LUKATELA, GEORGIJE; B. GLIGORIJEVIC; ALEKSANDAR KOSTIC; and MICHAEL T. TURVEY. 1980. Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition 8.415-23.
43. LUKATELA, GEORGIJE; Z. MANDIC; B. GLIGORIJEVIC; ALEKSANDAR KOSTIC; MILAN SAVIC; and MICHAEL T. TURVEY. 1978. Lexical decision for inflected nouns. Language and Speech 21.166-73.
44. MACWHINNEY, BRIAN, and JARED LEINBACH. 1991. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition 40.121-57.
45. MACWHINNEY, BRIAN; JARED LEINBACH; ROMAN TARABAN; and JANET MCDONALD. 1989. Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language 28.255-77.
46. MARSLEN-WILSON, WILLIAM; MARY HARE; and LIANNE OLDER. 1993. Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon. Cognitive Science Society 15.
47. MARSLEN-WILSON, WILLIAM; LORRAINE K. TYLER; RACHELLE WAKSLER; and LIANNE OLDER. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101.3-33.
48. MÜNTE, THOMAS F; TESSA SAY; HARALD CLAHSEN; KOLJA SCHILTZ; and MARTA KUTAS. 1999. Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research 7.241-53.
49. NAPPS, SHIRLEY E. 1989. Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory and Cognition 17.729-39.
50. ORSOLINI, MARGHERITA, and WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON. 1997. Universals in morphological representation: Evidence from Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes 12.1-47.
51. PINKER, STEVEN. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. PINKER, STEVEN. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
53. PINKER, STEVEN, and ALAN S. PRINCE. 1991. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 17.230-51.
54. PLUNKETT, KIM, and VIRGINIA MARCHMAN. 1993. From rote learning to system building. Cognition 38.43-102.
55. RUECKL, JAY G.; MICHELLE MIKOLINSKI; MICHAL RAVEH; CAROLINE S. MINER; and FRANK MARS. 1997. Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language 36.382-405.
56. RUMELHART, DAVID E., and JAMES L. MCCLELLAND. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. Parallel distributed processing, ed. by James L. McClelland, David E. Rumelhart, and the PDP Research Group, vol. 2, 216-271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. SCHREUDER, ROBERT, and HARALD BAAYEN. 1995. Modeling morphological processing. Morphological aspects of language processing, ed. by Laurie B. Feldman, 131-54. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. SCHRIEFERS, HERBERT; ANGELA D. FRIEDERICI; and PATTY A. M. GRAETZ. 1992. Inflectional and derivational morphology in the mental lexicon: Symmetries and asymmetries in repetition priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44A.373-90.
59. SONNENSTUHL, INGRID; SONJA EISENBEISS; and HARALD CLAHSEN. 1999. Morphological priming and the mental lexicon: Evidence from German. Cognition 72.203-36.
60. STANNERS, ROBERT F.; JAMES J. NEISER; WILLIAM P. HERNON; and ROGER HALL. 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18.399-412.
61. STUMP, GREGORY T. 1993. On rules of referral. Language 69.449-79.
62. STUMP, GREGORY T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. TARABAN, ROMAN; JANET MCDONALD; and BRIAN MACWHINNEY. 1989. Category learning 5 in a connectionist model: Learning to decline the German definite article. Linguistic categorization, ed. by Roberta L. Corrigan, Fred Eckman, and Michael Noonan, 163-93. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
64. TENPENNY, PATRICIA L. 1995. Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2.339-63.
65. WINER, BEN J. 1971. Statistical principles in experimental design. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.
66. WUNDERLICH, DIETER. 1987. Vermeide Pronomen - vermeide leere Kategorien. Studium Linguistik 21.36-44.
67. WUNDERLICH, DIETER. 1996. Minimalist morphology: The role of paradigms. Yearbook of Morphology 1995.93-114.
68. WUNDERLICH, DIETER. 1997. Der unterspezifizierte Artikel. Sprache im Fokus, ed. by Christa Dürscheid, Karl-Heinz Ramers, and Monika Schwarz, 47-55. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
69. WUNDERLICH, DIETER, and RAY FABRI. 1995. Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 14.236-94.
70. ZWICKY, ARNOLD M. 1985. How to describe inflection. Berkeley Linguistics Society 11.372-86.
71. ZWICKY, ARNOLD M. 1986. The general case: Basic form versus default form. Berkeley Linguistics Society 12.305-15.