Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words

Theoretical Linguistics

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 201-250

  Clahsen, Harald ^a   Eisenbeiss, Sonja ^a   Sonnenstuhl Henning, Ingrid ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013783184     PISSN: 03014428     EISSN: 16134060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/thli.1997.23.3.201     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R. & van Run, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, PA
2. Baayen, H., Dijkstra, T. & Schreuder, R. (1995). Regular morphology in comprehension: beyond ‘rules or representations’?. Ms., MPI für Psycholinguistik: Nijmegen (The Netherlands)
3. Bartke, S., Marcus, G. & Clahsen, H. (1996). Acquiring German noun plurals. In: Maclaughlin, D. & Mcewen, S. (eds.). Proceedings of the 19th Anual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 60-69). Cascadilla Press: Boston
4. Baumann, H., Nagengast, J., & Klaas, G. (1993). New Experimental Setup (NESU). Ms., MPI für Psycholinguistik: Nijmegen (The Netherlands)
5. Butterworth, B. L. (1983). Lexical representation. In: Butterworth, B.L. (ed.). Language Production. Vol. 2 (pp. 257-294). London: Academic Press
6. Bybee, J. (1991). Natural morphology: The organization of paradigms and language acquisition. In: Huebner, T. & Ferguson, C. (eds.). Crosscurrents in Second Language Acqusition and Linguistic Theories (67-92). Benjamins: Amsterdam
7. Bybee, J.L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, pp. 425-455.
8. Chambers, S. & Forster, K. (1975). Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task. Memory and Cognition 3, pp. 549-559
9. Clahsen, H. (1997). The representation of German participles in the German mental lexicon: evidence for the dual-mechanism model. Yearbook of Morphology 1996, pp. 73-95
10. Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A. & Marcus, G.F. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45, pp. 225-255
11. Clahsen H. & Rothweiler, M. (1993). Inflectional rules in children's grammars: evidence from the development of participles in German. Yearbook of Morphology 1992, pp. 1-34
12. Clahsen, H., Hong, U. & Sonnenstuhl-Henning, I. (1995). Grammatical constraints in syntactic processing: sentence-matching experiments on German. The Linguistic Review 12 (1), pp. 5-33
13. Clahsen, H., Marcus, G., Bartke, S. & Wiese, R. (1996). Compounding and inflection in German child language. Yearbook of Morphology 1995, pp. 115-142
14. Clark, H. (1973). The language-as-a-fixed-eflect fallacy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, pp. 335-359
15. Dressler, W.U., Mayerthaler, W, Panagl, O. & Wurzel, W.U. (1987). Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins
16. Forster, K. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In: Wales, R. J. & Walker, E. (eds.). New Approaches to Language Mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland
17. Forster, K. & Chambers, S. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, pp. 627-635
18. Forster, K. (1987). Binding, plausibility and modularity. In: Garfield, J. (ed.). Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Processing (pp. 63-82). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
19. Forster, K. & Stevenson, B. (1987). Sentence matching and well-formedness. Cognition 26, pp. 171-186
20. Frauenfelder U. & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: the role of productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991, pp. 165-183
21. Freedman, S. & Forster, K. (1985). The psychological status of overgenerated sentences. Cognition 24, pp. 171-186
22. Gassar, M. (1993). Learning words in time: towards a modular connectionist account of the acquisition of receptive morphology. Bloomington University
23. Göbel, R. & Indefrey, P. (1994) The performance of a recurrent network with short term memory capacity learning the German -s plural. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Models of Language Acqisition. Tillburg: The Netherlands
24. Henderson, L. (1989). On mental representation of morphology and its diagnosis by mesures of visual access speed. In: Marslen-Wilson, W. (ed.). Lexical representation and process (pp. 357-391). MIT Press
25. Kim, J.J., Marcus, G., Pinker, S., Hollander, M. & Coppola, M. (1994). Sensitivity of children's inflection to morphological structure. Journal of Child Language 21, pp. 173-209
26. Köpcke, K.-M. (1993). Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen. Versuch einer kognitiven Morphologie. Tübingen: Narr
27. Köpcke, K.-M. (1988). Schemas in German plural formation. Lingua 74, pp. 303-335
28. Kucera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence: Brown University Press
29. Laudanna, A., & Burani, C. (1985). Address mechanisms to decomposed lexical entries. Linguistics 23, pp. 715-792
30. Laudanna, A. & Burani, C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: implications for processing. In: Feldman, L. B. (ed.). Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 345-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press
31. MacWhinney, B. & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition 40, pp. 121-157
32. Manelis, L. & Tharp, D. (1977). The processing of affixed words. Memory and Cognition 5, pp. 690-695
33. Marcus, G.F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T.J., & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in Language Acquisition. (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development) 51 (4, Serial No. 228)
34. Marcus, G.F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R. & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: the exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29, pp. 189-256
35. Marslen-Wilson, W., Hare, M. & Older, L. (1993). Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boulder
36. Miller, G. A. & N. Chomsky (1963). Finitary models of language users. In: Luce, R., Bush, R. & Galanter, E. (eds.). Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II. (pp. 419-492). New York: Wiley
37. Nakisa, R. & Hahn, U. (1996). Where defaults don't help: the case of the German plural system. Unpublished ms: University of Oxford
38. Orsolini, M. & Marslen-Wilson, W (1995). Representing morphological irregularity in the mental lexicon: evidence from Italian. Ms., University of Chieti and Birkbeck College London
39. Pinker, S. & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a Parallel Distributed Processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28, pp. 73 -193
40. Pinker, S. & Prince, A. (1992). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA
41. Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multilayered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 38, pp. 1-60
42. Plunkett, K. & Marchmann, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building. Cognition 38, pp. 43-102
43. Prasada, S., Pinker, S. & Snyder, W. (1990). Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule-generated. Poster presented at the 31 st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, November 16-18, 1990
44. Pritchett, B.L. (1992). Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
45. Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In: McClelland, J., Rumelhart, D. & the PDP Research Group (eds.). Parallel Distributed Processing. Volume 2 (pp 218-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
46. Schreuder, R. & H. Baayen (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In: Feldman, L. B. (ed.). Morphological Aspects of Language Processing (pp. 131- 154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press
47. Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. & Graetz, P. (1992). Inflectional and derivational morphology in the mental lexicon: symmetries and asymmetries in repetition priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44, pp. 373-390
48. Stanners, R.F., Neiser, J.J., Hernon, W.R. & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, pp. 399-412
49. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word-frequency effect. Memory and Cognition 7, pp. 263-272
50. Taft, M. (1988). A morphological decomposition model of lexical representation. Linguistics 26, pp. 657-667
51. Taft, M. & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, pp. 638-647
52. Taft, M., Hambly, G. & Kinoshita, S. (1986). Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 38, pp. 357-366
53. Van Santen, A. & Lallemann, J. (1994). Gaat zwak anders dan sterk? Over de produktie van Nederlandse regelmatige en onregelmatige verleden-tijdsvormen. Forum der Letteren 35, pp. 1-22
54. Weyerts, H. & Clahsen, H. (1994). Netzwerke und symbolische Regeln im Spracherwerb: Experimentelle Ergebnisse zur Entwicklung der Flexionsmorphologie. Linguistische Berichte 154, pp. 430-460
55. Wilmot, L. (1994). Connectionist techniques and German noun plurals. MSc thesis: University of Essex