Pre-attentive detection of syntactic and semantic errors

NeuroReport

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 77-80

  Menning, Hans ^b   Zwitserlood, Pienie ^a   Schöning, Sonja ^a   Hihn, Hermina ^a   Bölte, Jens ^a   Dobel, Christian ^a   Mathiak, Klaus ^d   Lütkenhöner, Bernd ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive; Language; Magnetoencephalography; Mismatch field; Mismatch negativity; Phonological processing; Semantic; Speech; Syntactic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; BRAIN; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MAGNETICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH;

EID: 13244289778     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200501190-00018     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Marslen-Wilson W, Brown CM and Tyler LK. Lexical representations in spoken language comprehension. LangCogn Processes 1988; 3:1-16.
2. Frazier L and Clifton C. Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996.
3. Friederici AD. Syntactic, prosodic, and semantic processes in the brain: evidence from event-related neuroimaging. J Psycholinguist Res 2001; 30:237-250.
4. Trueswell JC and Tanenhaus MK. In: Rainer K (ed.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994, pp. 155-179.
5. Neville HJ, Nicol J, Barss A, Forster K and Garrett M. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 1991; 3:155-170.
6. Friederici AD, Pfeifer E and Hahne A. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1993; 1:183-193.
7. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ and Swinney DA. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1994; 20:786-803.
8. Pulvermüller F, Assadollahi R and Elbert T. Neuromagnetic evidence for early semantic access in word recognition. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 13:201-205.
9. Zwitserlood P. The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition 1989; 32:25-64.
10. Näätänen R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology 2001; 38:1-21.
11. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9:97-113.
12. Lütkenhöner B, Krumbholz K, Lammertmann C, Seither-Preisler A, Steinstrater O and Parterson RD. Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage 2003; 18:58-66.
13. Shtyrov Y and Pulvermüller F. Neurophysiological evidence of memory traces for words in the human brain. Neuroreport 2002; 13:521-525.
14. Frisch S and Schlesewsky M. The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. Neuroreport 2001; 12:3391-3394.
15. Hahne A and Friederici AD. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis. Early automatic and late controlled processes. J Cogn Neurosci 1999; 11:194-205.
16. Hahne A and Friederici AD. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002; 13:339-356.
17. Garnsey S, Pearlmurter N and Myers E. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. J Mem Lang 1997; 37:58-93.