Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible needles and interactive sequences for musculoskeletal interventions using an open high-field magnetic resonance imaging scanner

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 346-351

  Wonneberger, Uta ^a   Schnackenburg, Bernhard ^b   Streitparth, Florian ^a   Walter, Thula ^a   Rump, Jens ^a   Teichgräber, Ulf K M ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Interventional radiology; Open high field MRI; Passive needle tracking; Susceptibility artefact; Thermometry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; THERMOMETRY;

ALLOYS; ARTIFACTS; CADAVER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SAMPLING STUDIES;

EID: 77952800572     PISSN: 01741551     EISSN: 1432086X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-009-9676-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Schulz T, Puccini S, Schneider JP Kahn T (2004) Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience. Eur Radiol 14(12):2212-2227
2. Smith KA, Carrino J (2008) MRI-guided interventions of the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging 27(2):339-346
3. Fritz J, Clasen S, Boss A et al (2008) Real-time MR fluoroscopynavigated lumbar facet joint injections: feasibility and technical properties. Eur Radiol 18(7):1513-1518
4. de Senneville BD, Mougenot C, Quesson B, Dragonu I, Grenier N, Moonen CT (2007) MR thermometry for monitoring tumor ablation. Eur Radiol 17(9):2401-2410
5. Streitparth F, Walter T, Wonneberger U (2009) Image-guided spinal injection procedures in open high-field MRI with vertical field orientation: feasibility and technical features. Eur Radiol (in press)
6. Fritz J, Pereira PL (2007) MR-guided pain therapy: principles and clinical applications. Rofo 179(9):914-924
7. Steiner P, Zweifel K, Botnar R et al (1998) MR guidance of laser disc decompression: preliminary in vivo experience. Eur Radiol 8(4):592-597
8. Streitparth F, Gebauer B, Melcher I et al (2009) MR-guided laser ablation of osteoid osteoma in an open high-field system (1.0 T). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32(2):320-325
9. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2001) Designation: F 2119-01-standard test method for evaluation of MR image artifacts from passive implants. ATSM, West Conshohocken
10. Frahm C, Gehl HB, Melchert UH, Weiss HD (1996) Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19(5):335-340
11. Di Maio SP, Kacher DF, Ellis RE et al (2006) Needle artifact localization in 3T MR images. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:120-125
12. Altman DG, Bland JM (1996) Comparing several groups using analysis of variance. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 312(7044):1472-1473
13. Quesson B, de Zwart JA, Moonen CT (2000) Magnetic resonance temperature imaging for guidance of thermotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 12(4):525-533
14. Ladd ME, Erhart P, Debatin JF, Romanowski BJ, Boesiger P, McKinnon GC (1996) Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 36(4):646-651
15. Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR, Petersilge CA, Chao CP, Haaga JR (1996) Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR 166(6):1337-1345
16. Liu H, Hall WA, Martin AJ, Truwit CL (2001) Biopsy needle tip artifact in MR-guided neurosurgery. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(1):16-22
17. Liu H, Martin AJ, Truwit CL (1998) Interventional MRI at highfield (1.5 T): needle artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 8(1):214-219
18. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R (1985) Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 3(4):329-343
19. Muller-Bierl B, Graf H, Lauer U, Steidle G, Schick F (2004) Numerical modeling of needle tip artifacts in MR gradient echo imaging. Med Phys 31(3):579-587
20. Muller-Bierl B, Graf H, Steidle G, Schick F (2005) Compensation of magnetic field distortions from paramagnetic instruments by added diamagnetic material: measurements and numerical simulations. Med Phys 32(1):76-84
21. Reichenbach JR, Wurdinger S, Pfleiderer SO, Kaiser WA (2000) Comparison of artifacts produced from carbon fiber and titanium alloy needles at 1.5 T MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 11(1):69-74
22. Farahani K, Sinha U, Sinha S, Chiu LC, Lufkin RB (1990) Effect of field strength on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 14(6):409-413
23. Chopra SS, Rump J, Schmidt SC et al (2009) Imaging sequences for intraoperative MR-guided laparoscopic liver resection in 1.0-T high field open MRI. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1393-7
24. Ishiwata Y, Takada H, Gondo G, Osano S, Hashimoto T, Yamamoto I (2007) Magnetic resonance-guided percutaneous laser disk decompression for lumbar disk herniation-relationship between clinical results and location of needle tip. Surg Neurol 68(2):159-163
25. Schoenenberger AW, Steiner P, Debatin JF et al (1997) Real-time monitoring of laser diskectomies with a superconducting, openconfiguration MR system. AJR 169(3):863-867
26. Steiner P, Schoenenberger AW, Erhart P, Penner E, von Schulthess GK, Debatin JF (1997) Imaging temperature changes in an interventional 0.5 T magnet: in-vitro results. Lasers Surg Med 21(5):464-473
27. Wlodarczyk W, Hentschel M, Wust P et al (1999) Comparison of four magnetic resonance methods for mapping small temperature changes. Phys Med Biol 44(2):607-624