Compensation of magnetic field distortions from paramagnetic instruments by added diamagnetic material: Measurements and numerical simulations

Medical Physics

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 76-84

  Müller Bierl, Bernd ^a   Graf, Hansjörg ^a   Steidle, Günter ^a   Schick, Fritz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dipole model; Interventional MRI; MR artifacts; MR compatible instruments

Indexed keywords

COATINGS; CYLINDERS (SHAPES); IMAGE CODING; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PARAMAGNETISM; RANDOM ACCESS STORAGE; SCANNING; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

ABSOLUTE QUANTIFICATION; DIPOLE MODEL; INTERVENTIONAL; MAGNETIC FIELD DISTORTION; MR ARTIFACTS; MR-COMPATIBLE; PARAMAGNETIC PROPERTIES; STATIC MAGNETIC FIELDS;

NUMERICAL MODELS;

BISMUTH; NITINOL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIPOLE; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERNATIONAL STANDARD UNIT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; THICKNESS; VELOCITY;

EID: 12844259427     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.1828674     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. R. B. Lufkin, D. H. Gronemeyer, and R. M. Seibel, "Interventional MRI: Update," Eur. Radiol. 7, 187-200 (1997).
2. H. B. Gehl and C. Frahm, "MRI-controlled biopsies," Radiologe 38, 194-199 (1998).
3. A. Bücker, G. Adam, J. M. Neuerburg, A. Glowinski, J. Tacke, and R. W. Günther, "Interventional magnetic resonance imaging-Non-invasive imaging for interventions," Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 172, 105-114 (2000).
4. F. A. Jolesz and S. M. Blumenfeld, "Interventional use of magnetic resonance imaging," Magn. Reson. Q. 10, 85-96 (1994).
5. A. Melzer, A. Schmidt, K. Kipfmuller, D. H. Gronemeyer, and R. Seibel, "Technology and principles of tomographic image-guided interventions and surgery," Surg. Endosc 11, 946-956 (1997).
6. M. E. Ladd and J. F. Debatin, "Interventional and intravascular MR angiography," Curr. Dev. Psychopharmacol 25, 440-451 (2000).
7. M. A. Moscatel, F. G. Shellock. and S. M. Morisoli, "Biopsy needles and devices: Assessment of ferromagnetism and artifacts during exposure to a 1.5 T MR system," J. Magn. Reson Imaging 5, 369-372 (1995).
8. J. D. Port and M. G. Pomper, "Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images," J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 24, 958-964 (2000).
9. L. Arena, H. T. Morehouse, and J. Safir, "MR imaging artifacts that simulate disease: How to recognize and eliminate them," Radiographics 15, 1373-1394 (1995).
10. F. A. Jolesz, P. R. Morrison. S. J. Koran, R. J. Kelley, S. G. Hushek, R. W. Newman. M. P. Fried, A. Melzer, R. M. Seibel, and H. Jalahej. "Compatible instrumentation for intraoperative MRI: Expanding resources," J. Magn. Reson Imaging 8, 8-11 (1998).
11. H. Mumtaz and S. E. Harms, "Biopsy and intervention working group report," J. Magn. Reson Imaging 10, 1010-1015 (1999).
12. F. G. Shellock, "Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: Evaluation of MR safety," J. Magn. Reson Imaging 13, 152-157 (2001).
13. J. F. Schenck, "The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds," Med. Phys. 23, 815-850 (1996).
14. S. Fritzsche, R. Thull, and A. Haase, "Reduzierung von NMR-bildartefakten durch benutzung optimierter Werkstoffe für diagnostische hilfsmittel and implantate," Biomed. Tech. 39, 42-46 (1994).
15. B. Müller-Bierl, H. Graf, U. Lauer, G. Steidle, and F. Schick, "Numerical modeling of needle tip artifacts in MR gradient echo imaging," Med. Phys. 31, 579-597 (2004).
16. F. Schick and O. Lutz, "Simultaneous determination of the macroscopic and microscopic static magnetic field inhomogeneity (MAGSUS)," J. Magn. Reson., Ser. B 102, 35-46 (1993).
17. S. Sinha, U. Sinha, R. Lufkin, and W. Hanafee, "Pulse sequence optimization for use with a biopsy needle in MRI," Magn. Reson. Imaging 7, 575-579 (1989).
18. K. M. Lüdeke, P. Röschmann, and R. Tischler. "Susceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging," Magn. Reson. Imaging 3, 329-343 (1985).
19. S. Posse and W. P. Aue. "Susceptibility artifacts in spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging," J. Magn. Reson. (1969-1992) 88, 473-492 (1990).
20. C. J. G. Bakker, R. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, and M. Fuderer, "Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: The cylinder model revisited," Magn. Reson. Imaging 11, 539-548 (1993).
21. C. J. G. Bakker, R. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, and L. M. P. Ramos, "Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging," Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 767-774 (1994).
22. R. Bhagwandien, R. van Ee, R. Beersma, C. J. G. Bakker, M. A. Moerland, and J. J. W. Lagendijk, "Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D," Magn. Reson, Imaging 10, 299-313 (1992).
23. R. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, C. J. G. Bakker, R. Beersma, and J. J. W. Lagendijk, "Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 3D," Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 101-107 (1994).
24. S. Balac, G. Caloz, G. Cathelineau, B. Chauvel, and J. D. de Certaines, "Integral method for numerical simulation of MRI artifacts induced by metallic implants," Magn. Reson. Med. 45, 724-727 (2001).
25. L. Li, "Magnetic susceptibility quantification for arbitrarily shaped objects in inhomogeneous fields," Magn. Reson. Med. 46, 907-916 (2001).
26. M. E. Ladd, P. Erhart, J. F. Debatin, B. J. Romanowski, P. Boesiger, and G. C. McKinnon, "Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts," Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 646-651 (1996).
27. H. Liu, A. J. Martin, and C. L. Truwit, "Interventional MRI at high-field (1.5 T): Needle artifacts," J. Magn. Reson Imaging 8, 214-219 (1998).
28. H. Liu, W. A. Hall, A. J. Martin, and C. L. Truwit, "Biopsy needle tip artifact in MR-guided neurosurgery," J. Magn. Reson Imaging 13, 16-22 (2001).
29. H. J. Langen, H. Kugel, M. Ortmann, M. Noack, R. M. de Rochemont, and P. Landwehr, "Functional capacity of MRI-compatible biopsy-needles in comparison with ferromagnetic biopsy-needles. In vitro studies," Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173, 658-662 (2001).
30. A. J. Aschoff, M. Wendt, E. M. Merkle, A. Shankaranarayanan, Y. C. Chung, J. L. Duerk, and J. S. Lewin, "Vergleich der suszeptibilitä tsartefakte unterschiedlicher radiofrequenzelektroden bei 0.2 T. Einfluß von elektrodenlegierung, pulssequenz und bildrekonstruktionsmethode," Fortschr. Röntgenstr. 173, 257-262 (2001).
31. J. S. Lewin, J. L. Duerk, V. R. Jain, C. A. Petersilge, C. P. Chao, and J. R. Haaga, "Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: Effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation," Am. J. Radiol. 166, 1337-1345 (1996).
32. C. Frahm, H. B. Gehl, U. H. Melchert, and H. D. Weiss, "Visualization of magnetic reasonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 tesla," Cardiovasc. Intervent Radiol. 19, 335-340 (1996).
33. S. B. King III, "Vascular stems and atherosclerosis," Circulation 79, 460-462 (1989).
34. R. A. Schatz, "A view of vascular stents," Circulation 79, 445-457 (1989).
35. C. L. Zollikofer, E. Schoch, G. Stuckmann, N. Espinosa, and M. Stiefel, "Percutaneous transluminal treatment of stenoses and obstructions in the venous system using vascular endoprostheses (stents)," Schweiz Med. Wochenschr 124, 995-1009 (1994).
36. J. Hug, E. Nagel, A. Bornstedt, B. Schanckenburg, H. Oswald, and E. Fleck, "Coronary arterial stents: Safety and artifacts during MR imaging," Radiology 216, 781-787 (2000).
37. F. G. Shellock and V. J. Shellock, "Metallic stents: Evaluation of MR imaging safety," Am. J. Roentgenol. 173, 543-547 (1999).
38. B. G. Taal, S. H. Muller, H. Boot, and W. Koops, "Potential risks and artifacts of magnetic resonance imaging of self-expandable esophageal stents," Gastrointest Endosc 46, 424-429 (1997).
39. C. Manke, W. R. Nitz, M. Lenhart, M. Volk, A. Geissler, S. Feuerbach, and J. Link, "Magnetic resonance monitoring of stent deployment. In vitro evaluation of different stent designs and stent delivery systems," Invest. Radiol. 35, 343-351 (2000).
40. M. Lenhart, M. Völk, C. Manke, W. R. Nitz, M. Strotzer, S. Feuerbach, and J. Link, "Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: In vitro examination with 14 stents," Radiology 217, 173-178 (2000).
41. G. P. Teitelbaum, W. G. Bradley, Jr., and B. D. Klein, "MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils," Radiology 166, 657-664 (1988).
42. P. B. Kingsley, "Magnetic field gradients and coherence-pathway elimination," J. Magn. Reson., Ser. B 109, 243-250 (1995).
43. J. R. Reichenbach, R. Venkatesan, D. A. Yablonskiy, M. R. Thompson, S. Lai, and E. M. Haacke, "Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging," J. Magn. Reson Imaging 7, 266-279 (1997).
44. S. C. K. Chu, Y. Xu, J. A. Balschi, and C. S. Springer, "Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: Use of paramagnetic reagents," Magn. Reson. Med. 13, 239-262 (1990).
45. D. A. Yablonskiy and E. M. Haacke, "Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: The static dephasing regime," Magn. Reson. Med. 32, 749-763 (1994).
46. R. W. Holt, P. J. Diaz, J. L. Duerk, and E. M. Bellon, "MR susceptometry: An external-phantom method for measuring bulk susceptibility from field-echo phase reconstruction maps," J. Magn. Reson Imaging 4, 809-818 (1994).
47. J. C. Ford, F. W. Wehrli, and H. W. Chung, "Magnetic field distribution in models of trabecular bone," Magn. Reson. Med. 30, 373-379 (1993).