Comparison of artifacts produced from carbon fiber and titanium alloy needles at 1.5 T MR imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 69-74

  Reichenbach, Jürgen R ^a   Wurdinger, Susanne ^a   Pfleiderer, Stefan O R ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artifacts; Biopsy needle; Device visualization; In vitro studies; Interventional MRI; Susceptibility artifact

Indexed keywords

CARBON FIBER; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOPSY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARTIFACTS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CARBON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; TITANIUM;

EID: 0033961358     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200001)11:1<69::AID-JMRI11>3.0.CO;2-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF, et al. MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 1986;161:605-609.
2. Lufkin RB, Teresi L, Hanafee WN. New needle for MR-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. AJR 1987;149:380-382.
3. Lufkin RB. Interventional MR imaging. Radiology 1995;197:16-18.
4. Silverman SG, Collick BC, Figueira MR, et al. Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 1995;197:175-181.
5. Ladd ME, Erhart P, Debatin JF, et al. Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:646-651.
6. Ludeke KM, Röschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985;3:329-343.
7. Bakker CGJ, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA, Fuderer M. Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient imaging: the cylinder model revisited. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;22:539-544.
8. Reichenbach JR, Venkatesan R, Yablonskiy DA, et al. Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:266-279.
9. Zelaya FO, Crozier S, Dodd S, McKenna R, Doddrell DM. Measurement and compensation of field inhomogeneities caused by differences in magnetic susceptibilities. J Magn Reson 1995;A115:131-136.
10. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-851.
11. Schenck JF, Rohling KW, Moriarity TM, Alexander E III, Jolesz FA. Carbon fiber biopsy cannulas for MR-compatible neurosurgical procedures. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance, Nice, 1995. p 1160.
12. Malquarti G, Berruet RG, Bois D. Prosthetic use of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin for esthetic crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:251-257.
13. Wurdinger S, Noras H, Straube K, Michaelsen S, Kaiser WA. New MRI-breast-coil for imaging and double-sided intervention: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1997;7:S243.
14. Bevington PR, Robinson DK. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences, 2nd ed. Boston: WCB McGraw-Hill; 1992. pp 28-32.
15. Farahani K, Sinha U, Sinha S, Chiu LC, Lufkin RB. Effect of field strength on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1990;14:409-413.
16. Schenck JF, Jolesz FA, Roemer PB, et al. Superconducting open-configuration MR imaging system for image-guided therapy. Radiology 1995;195:805-814.
17. Lenz GW, Dewey C. An open MRI system used for interventional procedures: current research and initial clinical results. In: Lemke HU, Inamura K, Jaffe CC, Vannier MW, editors. Computer assisted radiology. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995. pp 1180-1187.
18. Frahm C, Gehl HB, Melchert UH, Weiss HD. Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996;19:335-340.
19. Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR, et al. Needle-localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR 1996;166:1337-1345.