The effect of video-based approach on prospective teachers' ability to analyze mathematics teaching

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 223-241

  Alsawaie, Othman N ^a   Alghazo, Iman M ^a  

^a UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Analyzing mathematics teaching; Learning to notice; Methods courses; Teacher preparation; Video based approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952430757     PISSN: 13864416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alsawaie, O. N. (2004). Problem solving, reasoning, and communication: Mathematics teachers' beliefs and practices (Vol. 94). Ain Shams University: College of Education Journal.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
3. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417-436.
4. Cangelosi, J. S. (2003). Teaching mathematics in secondary and middle school: An interactive approach. OH, USA: Merill Prentice Hall.
5. Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 289-298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
6. Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1987). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition. New York, NY: The Free Press.
7. Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M., Sherin, M. G., & Wolfe, E. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 225-297.
8. Friel, S. N., & Carboni, L. W. (2000). Using video-based pedagogy in an elementary mathematics methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 100(3), 118-127.
9. Hammer, D. (2000). Teacher inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 184-215). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
10. Hawkins, D. (1973). What it means to teach. Teachers College Record, 75(1), 7-16.
11. Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. In J. Kilpatrick, G. W. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 5-23). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
12. Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 47-61.
13. Hughes, J. E., Packard, B. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2000). Expanding notions: Pre-service teachers' perceptions of using hypermedia and video to examine the nature of literacy instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(4), 599-629.
14. Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching. London: Falmer Press.
15. Kagan, D. (1993). Contexts for the use of classroom cases. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 117-129.
16. Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R. T., Stein, M. K., & Baxter, J. (1991). Where subject knowledge matters. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (pp. 87-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
17. Manouchehri, A., & Enderson, M. C. (2003). The utility of case study methodology in mathematics teacher preparation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 113-135.
18. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York: Routledge Falmer.
19. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of socio-mathematical norms in one-first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 236-266.
20. Ministry of Education. (2001). The national document for mathematics curriculum in public education. Dubai, UAE: Author.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. Nemser, S. F. (1983). Learning to teach. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 150-170). New York: Longman.
24. Santagata, R. (2009). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38-51.
25. Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123-140.
26. Schaefer, R. J. (1967). The school as the center of inquiry. New York: Harper & Row.
27. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94.
28. Schorr, R. Y., & Lesh, R. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on classroom-based teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective on teaching, learning, and problem-solving in mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. Scott Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75-93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183.
31. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teacher's ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology in Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491.
32. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video cub participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37.
33. Shulman, L. S. (1996). Just in case: Reflections on learning from experience. In J. A. Colbert, P. Desberg, & K. Trimble (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 197-217). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34. Sipusic, M. (1994, April). Access to practice equals growth: teacher participation in a video club. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
35. Skyes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 457-521). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
36. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 14-21.
37. Swars, S. L. (2005). Examining perceptions of mathematics teaching effectiveness among elementary prospective teachers with differing levels of mathematics teacher efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 139-147.
38. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002, April). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
39. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244-276.
40. van Zoest, L. R., & Stockero, S. L. (2008). Synergistic scaffolds as a means to support preservice teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2038-2048.
41. Walen, S. B., & Williams, S. R. (2000). Validating classroom issues: Case method in support of teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 3-26.
42. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Socio-mathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.