Quantitative repeated open application testing with a rinse-off product in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients: Results of the IVDK

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 330-337

  Heratizadeh, Annice ^a   Killig, Claudia ^a   Worm, Margitta ^b   Soost, Stephanie ^b   Simon, Dagmar ^c   Bauer, Andrea ^d   Mahler, Vera ^e   Schuster, Christian ^f   Szliska, Christiane ^g   Frambach, Yvonne ^h   Eben, Ricarda ⁱ   Werfel, Thomas ^a   Uter, Wolfgang ^e   Schnuch, Axel ^j  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^g Bethesda Hospital   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

CAS 35691 65 7; Consumer safety; Methyldibromo glutaronitrile; Patch testing technique; Rinse off cosmetics; ROAT; Use test

Indexed keywords

2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE; RINSE OFF PRODUCT; SOAP; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 1,2-DIBROMO-2,4-DICYANOBUTANE; NITRILE; PRESERVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; MALE; PATCH TEST; REPEAT OPEN APPLICATION TEST; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSITIZATION; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECTS; GERMANY; MIDDLE AGED; SKIN; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NITRILES; PATCH TESTS; PRESERVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL; SKIN; SOAPS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952282922     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01726.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch P J. Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicenter study (IVDK). Br J Dermatol 1998 : 138 : 467 476.
2. Fuchs T, Enders F, Przybilla B et al. Contact allergy to Euxyl K 400. Dermatosen 1991 : 39 : 151 153.
3. Geier J, Schnuch A, Fuchs T. Zunahme der Kontaktallergien gegen Methyldibromoglutaronitril in Deutschland. Allergologie 1996 : 19 : 399 402.
4. Tosti A, Guerra L, Bardazzi F, Gasparri F. Euxyl K 400: a new sensitizer in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 1991 : 25 : 89 93.
5. van Ginkel C J W, Rundervoort G J. Increasing incidence of contact allergy to the new preservative 1,2-dibromo-2, 4-dicyanobutane (methyldibromoglutaronitrile). Br J Dermatol 1995 : 132 : 918 920.
6. Vigan M, Brechat N, Girardin P, Adessi B, Meyer JP, Laurent R, Vuitton DA. Sensitization to Euxyl K 400, a prospective study in 1,217 patients. Eur J Dermatol 1996 : 6 : 175 177.
7. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Gefeller O. Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug utilisation research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Dermatitis 2002 : 47 : 32 39.
8. Commission of the European Communities. Commission directive 2003/83/EC of 24 September 2003. Official J Eur Union 2003 : L238 : 23 27.
9. Kynemund-Pedersen L, Agner T, Held E, Johansen J D. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in leave-on products elicits contact allergy at low concentration. Br J Dermatol 2004 : 151 : 817 822.
10. Schnuch A, Kelterer D, Bauer A et al. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients - results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 52 : 197 206. (Pubitemid 40676599)
11. Schnuch A, Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J. Kontaktallergien gegen Konservierungsmittel. Ergebnisse des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK) 1996 bis 2007. Allergo J 2008 : 17 : 631 638.
12. Johansen J D, Veien N, Laurberg G et al. Decreasing trends in methyldibromo glutaronitrile contact allergy - following regulatory intervention. Contact Dermatitis 2008 : 59 : 48 51.
13. Diba V C, Chowdhury M M, Adisesh A, Statham B N. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in hospital workers caused by methyldibromo glutaronitrile in a work soap. Contact Dermatitis 2003 : 48 : 118 119.
14. Johansen J D, Veien N K, Laurberg G, Kaaber K, Thormann J, Lauritzen M, Avnstorp C. Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile - data from a 'front line' network. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 52 : 138 141.
15. Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Smith K A. Provocative use testing of methyldibromoglutaronitrile in a cosmetic shampoo. Contact Dermatitis 2000 : 42 : 64 67.
16. Frosch P J, Lahti A, Hannuksela M, Andersen K E, Wilkinson J D, Shaw S, Lachapelle J M. Chloromethylisothiazolone/methylisothiazolone (CMI/MI) use test with a shampoo on patch-test-positive subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1995 : 32 : 210 217.
17. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A. Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients - an 8-year analysis of IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis 2003 : 49 : 236 240.
18. SCCP. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products Opinion on Methydibromoglutaronitrile (sensitisation only), SCCP/0863/05, 2005. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph-risk/committees/04-sccp/docs/sccp-o-00f.pdf (last accessed 25 January 2010).
19. Commission of the European Communities. Commission directive 2007/17/EC of 22 March 2007. Official J Eur Union 2007 : L82 : 27 30.
20. Schnuch A, Uter W, Dickel H et al. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde sensitive-patients. Contact Dermatitis 2009 : 61 : 152 162.
21. Nethercott J, Paustenbach D, Adams R et al. A study of chromium induced allergic contact dermatitis with 54 volunteers - implications for environmental risk assessment. Occup Environ Med 1994 : 52 : 371 380.
22. Johansen J D, Frosch P J, Svedman C, Andersen K E, Bruze M, Pirker C, Menné T. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde - known as Lyral: quantitative aspects and risk assessment of an important fragrance allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2003 : 48 : 310 316.
23. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Frosch P J. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: the Information Network of the Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) in Germany - a surveillance system on contact allergies. Eur J Dermatol 1998 : 8 : 36 40.
24. Hannuksela M, Salo H. The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 1986 : 14 : 221 227.
25. Johansen J D, Bruze M, Andersen K E et al. The repeated open application test: suggestions for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1998 : 39 : 95 96.
26. Jensen C D, Johansen J D, Menné T, Andersen K E. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in rinse-off products causes allergic contact dermatitis: an experimental study. Br J Dermatol 2004 : 150 : 90 95.
27. Schnuch A, Aberer W, Agathos M, Brasch J, Frosch P J, Richter G. Leitlinien der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (DDG) zur Durchführung des Epikutantests mit Kontaktallergenen. Hautarzt 2001 : 52 : 864 866.
28. Wahlberg J E, Lindberg M. Patch testing. In: Contact Dermatitis, 4th edition, Frosch P J, Menné T, Lepoittevin J P (eds)
29. Uter W, Schnuch A, Gefeller O. Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data. Contact Dermatitis 2004 : 51 : 47 56.
30. Reinsch, C H. Smoothing by spline functions. Numer Math 1967 : 10 : 177 183.
31. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Brasch J. Zur Reproduzierbarkeit der Epikutantestung. Allergologie 2002 : 25 : 415 419.
32. Zachariae C, Rastogi S, Devantier Ch, Menné T, Johansen J D. Methyldibromo glutaronitrile: clinical experience and exposure-based risk assessment. Contact Dermatitis 2003 : 48 : 150 154.
33. Zachariae C, Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Menné T. Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromo glutaronitrile - clinical cases from 2003. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 52 : 6.
34. Jensen C D, Johansen J D, Menné T, Andersen K E. Increased retest reactivity by both path and use test with methyldibromo glutaronitrile in sensitized individuals. Acta Derm Venereol 2006 : 86 : 8 12.
35. Agner T. Hand eczema. In: Contact Dermatitis, 4th edition, Frosch P J, Menné T, Lepoittevin J P (eds)
36. Jensen C D, Johansen J D, Menné T, Andersen K E. Methyldibromo glutaronitrile contact allergy: effect of single versus repeated daily exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 52 : 88 92.
37. Pedersen L K, Haslund P, Johansen J D, Held E, Volund A, Agner T. Influence of a detergent on skin response to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in sensitized individuals. Contact Dermatitis 2004 : 50 : 1 5.
38. Hostynek J J, Maibach H I. Thresholds of elicitation depend on induction conditions. Could low level exposure induce sub-clinical allergic states that are only elicited under the severe conditions of clinical diagnosis? Food Chem Toxicol 2004 : 42 : 1859 1865.
39. Gerberick G F, Robinson M K, Felter S P, White I R, Basketter D A. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis 2001 : 45 : 333 340.
40. Lewis P G, Jayjock M A. Risk assessment modelling: allergic contact dermatitis application. Am J Contact Dermat 1994 : 5 : 143 149.
41. Schnuch A, Brasch J, Uter W. Polysensitization and increased susceptibility in contact allergy: a review. Allergy 2008 : 63 : 156 167.